Is Sirius Really Increasing Prices by $2 in January 2012?
The news is making its way around that Sirius XM (NASDAQ:SIRI) will not be increasing prices in 2011, but instead may be raising prices by $2.00 across the board in January of 2012. Here in the short term the stock has taken a hit because many were anticipating a third quarter price increase based on what was stated by Sirius XM CEO Mel Karmazin in the Q1 conference call. The longer term outlook, from the investors perspective, seems promising.
Before we go off counting the new hundreds of millions of dollars that will reach SIRI coffers in 2012, we must look at exactly what was said past and present and understand the context in which it was stated. We must also consider some other factors. Certainly a $2.00 increase across the board would add substantial money to the revenue line. With an anticipated 18 million self paying subscribers and some back of the napkin math $2 represents $36 million more per month to the company.
All of the latest price increase talk relates to statements made by Sirius XM during a proposed law suit settlement that the company was anticipating raising prices by $2 per month:
“Defendant will provide support, through declarations or other evidence, that it has contemplated and made plans for raising the prices of its subscription plans and other charges, including the multi-receiver discount, by $2 per month (without an offsetting reduction in other fees) after the price restriction imposed upon it by the Federal Communications Commission expires on July 28, 2011.”
The key word here is “CONTEMPLATED”. It is not definitive and the context needs due consideration. Think about it. Sirius XM is trying to settle a lawsuit, and make the settlement rich enough to be acceptable to the opposition. Had they stated they were contemplating raising fees by $1, the proposed value would fall to $90 million instead of $180 million. The class, which essentially constitutes every self paying subscriber and anyone who churned out from July 2008 forward, helps to determine the value of the award. Sirius XM merely needs to show that $2 was a number they discussed. That is easy to do. They likely have contemplated a $1, $2, and even a $3 price hike. A $3 increase seems unrealistic, and $1 not enough to satisfy the opponent. Thus, $2 won the day.
These statements made by Sirius XM are not cast in stone. The company was trying to SELL a law suit settlement. In contrast, when they were trying to SELL the merger the company argued that they were more likely compelled to LOWER prices:
“As discussed above, Applicants have argued, however, that due to the particular nature of demand for satellite radio services, the merged entity will have an incentive instead to lower prices.316? FCC Merger Approval
What we know is that 1. the price cap ends on July 28th, and that the issue of a price cap or possible extension is right now being contemplated by the FCC, 2. the street was anticipating a price hike as early as this year, and 3. that price hike is now off of the table until at least Q1 2012. We also know that some (not all) analysts were anticipating a modest increase (in late 2011 or in 2012), but nothing to the scale of a $2 across the board hike. If the company does actually increase the price by $2, analyst models will be blown out of the water.
A new consideration that needs deeper exploration is that of pre-payment by subscribers. If the company announces an increase, subscribers can opt to pay early (in 2011) and tie themselves into long term contracts at current prices. This will generate huge amounts of cash into the coffers, help mitigate churn, and carry an impact on Sirius XM’s financials. If this comes to fruition, all of this will bode well for SIRI throughout 2012, bolstering longer term outlooks.
The new wild card is not whether the company will raise prices, but by how much. To assume $2 is premature. Sirius XM is walking a fine line with pricing. There are many competitors out there that have much less expensive alternatives, and it becomes a game of finding that sweet spot that maximizes revenue, mitigates churn, and attracts new users. The company has some huge advantages in content, but also needs to give the consumer perceived value.
My informed opinion is that investors need to be cautious about a $2 number and that it may be prudent to expect something more along the lines of $1. I may be being conservative, but I think that is far better than banking on an unknown at this point. Remember, in 6 months Mel and Sirius XM can say that they looked at the market and came to a number different than the $2 that is getting so much play today.
Position – Long Sirius XM Radio.
I think sirius is hoping the 2.0 upgrade will be worth the extra 2 dollars month to subscribers. I just hope I can use 2.0 in my car or I will prob be canceling and only get it the month I go on vaca with the 8hr drive
Shareholders are clueless not to like the news of not raising prices! Do they have any idea of how many subs like myself would cancel if they raise them?! The main reason more people don’t subscribe is because of the current prices! If anything they should drop prices more in line to Netflix’s $8 per month, if so I guarantee their subscriber count would at the very least quadruple or much more!
For Karmazin to use any word related to a price increase other than “contemplate” or something of this nature is certainly politically correct. It is unwise to put the cart before the government. Still, to dissect the news, we can say with high degree of certainty that there will be a price increase of $2 starting January 1, 2012. Any lower increase is not worth it. This is fantastic news that will take some time to sink in with investors. This is also called CERTAINTY that Sirius needs more than anything else to squash the rumor mill. Hopefully, Stern’s suit will be resolved to siri’s advantage as well… and all annoying hurdles will be done with. As I kept saying for a long time, 2011 is a warm up, 2012 is going to be a real deal with some price increase impact and great sub growth. Incidentally, you are right pointing out that for siri the outcome of the class action suit is a win-win situation because the existing subs, knowing about a highly likely price increase as of January 1, 2012, will be renewing like crazy and possibly for longer periods of time and the new ones may be more likely to subscribe in general and for longer periods as well. So, they will be wallowing in cash that they need so much for buybacks. Never underestimate this shrew sob Karmazin. He always gets what he wants. If he could get a merger in spite of huge pressure from NAB, he will be able to get a $2 price increase. To say that Sirius should be careful about the amount of such price increase has no merit because we have already been through the experience of royalty fees and siri’s core never budged. Nor will they budge now.
VI….
Be careful….The royalty fee was sold to consumers as a “tax” of sorts. They can not do that this time.
you either like/love the service or you could care less. It’s all good. You geniuses find something comparable i’m all ears…and don’t mention some internet music this or that. just bought some itune gift cards for the kids….now thats expensive. c’mon a 2.00 increase won’t bother anybody. the demographics for this product is established and growing. so churn wiggles a little bit… By the way, taking delivery of my boat next week and it has a sirius radio in it. can’t wait to fire it up.
If 2.0 is a stinker, I won’t be too anxious to pay more.
do you plan on buying a new radio when it comes out?? they have to start somewhere and build from it. streamlining this product/service is still months away. retail sales will bump hopefully if this product gets us out of our chairs…or at the very least we’ll see the direction sirius is heading. personally i would like to see a gps/radio/dvr type unit.
Sirius XM Radio said it won’t raise GAS prices by 2.00 this year.
Love the product, but not worth another penny more, if anything its more than what it should be now, if it were cheaper a lot more people would be willing to become subcribers!
I agree, if they would lower the price more people might get it.. But raise the price.. Good idea.. We were actually figuring on dropping our subs at the start of next year anyway.. Internet radio via i-tunes has everything we want and that’s fine..
Really, a 2 dollar increase is only 36 dollars more per month to the company? Better stay away from the napkin math! lol
Rick….
typo….should have been $36 million…..correction made
Good article. I don’t think $2, from $12.99 to $14.99 a month is going to break the bank for many ppl. You have to remember, perceived value is more important that actual value. This is a marketing game in Siri’s court to sell the value to the people. You have to also remember our country is the same country where people will pay $4 for a cup of Starbucks over a $2 Dunkin D coffee or less for a no name.
Why is that? Marketing tells us people tie quality to price. “Free” Pandora is just like a much better FM radio, both having commercials. When you pay for something, you expect to get your money’s worth. If Sirius can convince people are getting their money’s worth with content and delivery that cannot be match, people will pay. And let’s face it, you need broadband or a smart phone for pandora. Each of those Internet plans should come at a minimum of $30 a month. So $14.99 for Unlimited radio via Sirius is affordable.
There is a reason Sirius has over 20M subscribers. Really think about it, if “free” Internet radio was so great and better than Sirius, wouldn’t the word have gotten around? Wouldn’t we have seen mass detections from Sirius? We have not.
Pandora, Slacker, etc is to broadcast TV as Sirius is to Cable or Satellite TV. As a consumer, which would you rather have?
BeenSirius….
Perceived value is the key here. part of what generates perceived value is the pricing in the competitive landscape.
You state:
“There is a reason Sirius has over 20M subscribers. Really think about it, if “free” Internet radio was so great and better than Sirius, wouldn’t the word have gotten around? Wouldn’t we have seen mass detections from Sirius? We have not.”
I am not saying Internet radio is better than Sirius XM. I am saying that it is better for many people. Consider that Sirius XM’s growth story in Q1 came on the heels of promotional subscriptions. Consider that ARPU has been in a steady decline. Consider that people are turning down offers to stay with Sirius for $5 per month.
Sirius XM loses 533,000 people per month, and while the additions are higher, it is not like this company is adding millions each quarter.
I think free is better for people who can’t afford it or choose not to, because they are still worried about the economy. Or simply they can’t afford it, or don’t have a car, like many college students or low income individuals.
I am one able to afford the bill and have the choice between free and Sirius: I like Sirius. So much so, I’ve became an investor.
As with every sub service, you will have churn. But its so low, 2%. If we look a few yrs ago, before the recession, back when unemployment was like 5%, Sirius and XM were pulling like 3M subs a year. Whats changed, spending power. Hence, the growth of Panhora and Slapper.
As the economy and jobs come back, SIRI stands to benefit and accelerate subs growth.
Though I can’t put a total value on it, this commentary ignores the fact that some of SIRI’s 18 million paying customers will not contribute additional revenue, even with a price increase, because, like me, they purchased a lifetime subscription. I was an XM subscriber, and that company didn’t offer a lifetime subscription. But after the merger, I was able to do it. It cost me about $500, which the company booked, but I’ll never pay another penny. In less than four years I make back the cost compared to paying monthly ad infinitum.
David….
The number of people that buy lifetime subscriptions is minimal and would not really impact the numbers.
In addition, the lifetime subscription is not really a lifetime membership. You can only upgrade radios 3 times, and they do not necessarily owe you features like satellite radio 2.0 with your plan.
That’s interesting info, Spencer. Thank you.
My next radio upgrade will be my first. I have a MyFi as well as a separate three-year subscription for the car. I jawboned them successfully to let me have the Internet version for no extra fee above what I paid for the lifetime subscription. I don’t recall that they gave me a written contract or any document explaining the terms of my lifetime subscription, so you can bet I’ll be jawboning them again if they want me to pay additionally for SatRad 2.0.
Some additions to my earlier comment. There are several prospective positives that should drive the stock price.
First, a modest subscription increase WILL come evenutally, and with CapEx limited over the next several years, most of the additional revenue will drop directly to the bottom line.
Second, if 2.0 has all the features that are being hinted at, this will bring satellite radio closer to the TIVO/DVR model where listeners will have much greater control over what they record, listen to and manipulate.
Third, despite claims that you can get much the same programming from free Internet radio and other sources, whether that is true or not depends on what you want to hear. I subscribed to XM in the first place because of Major League Baseball, wanting to follow every game of my Red Sox and many other teams, too. You cannot get that as conveniently from other sources.
Fourth, SIRI is on a “watch list” of 50 NASDAQ stocks being considered to go into the NASDAQ 100 Index when openings occur. You think that eventuality, when it happens, will not trigger a big surge in institutional interest and investments?
Finally, don’t forget that Karmazin suggested in the Q1 CC that a stock repurchase program might be the best use of the mounting pile of free cash the company will have.