Page 29 of 98 ... 1927282930313979 ...
Results 281 to 290 of 978
  1. MUSCLE13 is offline
    Addict
    MUSCLE13's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 973
    08-10-2015, 02:53 PM #281
    Here are the real numbers -

    Net subscriber losses were up sharply at DirecTV – which completed its $48.5 billion merger with AT&T on July 24 – to 133,000 in the period, more than double analysts’ estimates and nearly four times the 34,000 loss in the same period of 2014. Coupled with Dish Network’s loss of 81,000 net subscribers in the period – and adding an estimated 70,000 additional subscribers attributed to Sling TV -- and total satellite TV subscriber declines in the period were 284,000, nearly four times the 78,000 lost in the second quarter of 2014.

    Telco TV companies like Verizon and AT&T lost a collective 2,000 subscribers in the period, compared to a gain of 29,000 customers a year ago.

    Cable companies actually fared better – the sector lost about 280,000 customers in the period, almost half the 534,000 shed a year ago. At about 1.9%, the rate of decline for the cable sector dipped below 2% for the first time in seven years, according to Moffett.

    - See more at: http://www.multichannel.com/news/cab....VWjpOzUO.dpuf

  2. midas360 is offline
    08-10-2015, 03:15 PM #282
    Thanks for the info... we agree muscle, I just think we say it differently.

  3. MUSCLE13 is offline
    Addict
    MUSCLE13's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 973
    08-10-2015, 03:20 PM #283
    Quote Originally Posted by midas360 View Post
    Thanks for the info... we agree muscle, I just think we say it differently.
    I really don't think we agree at all. I believe Cable is going to thrive and Sat TV is going the way of the old roof antenna.

  4. midas360 is offline
    08-10-2015, 03:26 PM #284
    You are talking about a method of distribution then. I might agree with you there. I believe the same is going to happen to Sirius XM too. Maybe Sirius XM should be strictly a content business and leave the distribution up to another provider?

    Quote Originally Posted by MUSCLE13 View Post
    I really don't think we agree at all. I believe Cable is going to thrive and Sat TV is going the way of the old roof antenna.

  5. dm_4 is offline
    Guru
    dm_4's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Location: Boston, Ma Posts: 3,035
    08-10-2015, 03:27 PM #285
    Quote Originally Posted by midas360 View Post
    You are talking about a method of distribution then. I might agree with you there. I believe the same is going to happen to Sirius XM too.
    Quote Originally Posted by MUSCLE13 View Post
    I really don't think we agree at all. I believe Cable is going to thrive and Sat TV is going the way of the old roof antenna.
    lol....funny he thinks you agree...how could he arrive at that statement? You have been crystal clear on your position that cable companies will clearly dominate! funny tho.

  6. MUSCLE13 is offline
    Addict
    MUSCLE13's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 973
    08-10-2015, 03:32 PM #286
    Quote Originally Posted by midas360 View Post
    You are talking about a method of distribution then. I might agree with you there. I believe the same is going to happen to Sirius XM too. Maybe Sirius XM should be strictly a content business and leave the distribution up to another provider?
    No I am talking about video and broadband packaged together with cable at gigabit speeds and integrated under the X1 platform vs one way Sat TV.

    For Sat radio Sirius already competes inside the car with 200,000 smartphones in this country and has already announced SXM 17 its plans to integrate sat and internet radio into a seamless experience in the car.

    Radio and TV are 2 very different businesses concerning both content costs and distribution methods.
    Last edited by MUSCLE13; 08-10-2015 at 03:35 PM.

  7. user34615145 is offline
    Addict
    user34615145's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2014 Posts: 668
    08-10-2015, 03:36 PM #287
    Quote Originally Posted by MUSCLE13 View Post
    I really don't think we agree at all. I believe Cable is going to thrive and Sat TV is going the way of the old roof antenna.
    FWIW, I think you guys are saying the same thing but coming from different perspectives.

    I dunno....Cable companies like ESPN are so....1980's. I watch my fair share of sports but I can't remember the last time I tuned into ESPN or one if it's related channels. If I want to watch MLB, I go to the MLB.com app on my phone/laptop. If I want to watch golf I go to the Golfchannel.com app, etc. - and I can cast it to my tv with Apple TV or Chrome Cast or whatever - I actually have three different devices for that. If want to see a movie or some TV show content I prefer to use Netflix. Sure, some first run movies I'll pay up for or a couple of baseball games each season I'll go down and see, but I actually prefer to watch from the comfort of my own home vs. actually going to the sports event or movies. With the new HD large screen TV's I get that movie quality in my living room.

  8. midas360 is offline
    08-10-2015, 03:38 PM #288
    I think Sirius XM satellites will go by the waste side and they will strictly provide their service via the internet one day. I mean they kind of already do.

    Bundling is nothing new and yes it does work for everyone in the business.

    Quote Originally Posted by MUSCLE13 View Post
    No I am talking about video and broadband packaged together with cable at gigabit speeds and integrated under the X1 platform vs one way Sat TV.

    For Sat radio Sirius already competes inside the car with 200,000 smartphones in this country and has already announced SXM 17 its plans to integrate sat and internet radio into a seamless experience in the car.

    Radio and TV are 2 very different businesses concerning both content costs and distribution methods.
    Last edited by midas360; 08-10-2015 at 03:40 PM.

  9. MUSCLE13 is offline
    Addict
    MUSCLE13's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 973
    08-10-2015, 03:40 PM #289
    Quote Originally Posted by user34615145 View Post
    FWIW, I think you guys are saying the same thing but coming from different perspectives.

    I dunno....Cable companies like ESPN are so....1980's. I watch my fair share of sports but I can't remember the last time I tuned into ESPN or one if it's related channels. If I want to watch MLB, I go to the MLB.com app on my phone/laptop. If I want to watch golf I go to the Golfchannel.com app, etc. - and I can cast it to my tv with Apple TV or Chrome Cast or whatever - I actually have three different devices for that. If want to see a movie or some TV show content I prefer to use Netflix. Sure, some first run movies I'll pay up for or a couple of baseball games each season I'll go down and see, but I actually prefer to watch from the comfort of my own home vs. actually going to the sports event or movies. With the new HD large screen TV's I get that movie quality in my living room.
    Good Lord. I said cable companies (ie Comcast Charter etc) The distribution of video cable/broadband vs Sat TV

  10. dm_4 is offline
    Guru
    dm_4's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Location: Boston, Ma Posts: 3,035
    08-10-2015, 03:43 PM #290
    Quote Originally Posted by MUSCLE13 View Post
    Good Lord. I said cable companies (ie Comcast Charter etc) The distribution of video cable/broadband vs Sat TV
    Good lord....what knuckleheads!!