Not going away EVER SiriuslyWrong. Anyone who bases his economic beliefs on a theory of economics that has been wrong so often ought to be a little more humble when he lectures others about free enterprise.
SIRIUS XM SATELLITE RADIO FORUM
Not going away EVER SiriuslyWrong
Anyone inclined to listen to SiriuslyWrong I advise you to read this thread on Peter Schiff.
If you are sane you will recoil in horror on his stupidity for reading and praising him. lol
SiriuslyWrong's judgement is lacking. There is clear proof when you see that his favorite "economist" Peter Schiff has gotten
so much SO WRONG. Embarassing.
You must not live in America. Free enterprise and capitalism have made this country the greatest on the planet, and the most desired place to live -- even today.Originally Posted by Havakasha
Not going away EVER SiriuslyWrong
Every one here is for free enterprise and capitalism, but of course you would rather post silly distortions about the liberal point of view rather than own up to how off your economic theories have been in their prescriptions for our economy.
As I have SHOWN HERE the problem is your Austrian school of economics and Peter Schiff have made wrong economic calls over the course of many years and yet you continue to spout their talking points. You really should be embarassed.
Had to memorialize that gem.
America is the greatest nation because of free enterprise and capitalism which is PRECISELY what Schiff endorses.
Now, you should be embarassed.
You really dont get it do you. What Mr. Schiff is endorsing is a PARTICULAR point of view on free enterprise and capitalism.
He has been wrong so many times as to be very embarassing. That is simply a fact as i have
shown with the article i started this thread with.Any neutral person reading what Schiff has predicted would understand what I am saying. You are aligning yourself with a con artist. Sad.
And what is his particular view of free enterprise and capitalism?
Its an extreme right wing perspective. Calling President Obama a Marxist is but just one example.
And based on all his extreme views he mixes up his politics and economics and gets
almost all his predictions wildly wrong. The facts are the facts and my article lays out those facts.
Any neutral person would agree I believe. We could put it to a test? lol
Reply With Quote