Well said Homer!!!! everybody relax and be prepared for the long run,it will take about 2 years for this stock to be out of the woods financially.in the mean time either buy more or turn off the P.C. or MAC and faget about it...
I have been trying to figure out (as I have always thought Sirius XM should BK XM holdings) if doing so would cause the Malone deal to be retracted.
After going over as much as I could again with the deal I think this would pull it off the table:
http://investor.sirius.com/secfiling...=930413-09-841
"The closing and funding of the XM Credit Agreement is subject to several conditions, including: (i) XM’s existing credit agreements being amended to extend the maturity of the loans to a date and on terms reasonably satisfactory to Liberty Media Corporation, (ii) Liberty Media Corporation purchasing assignments of loans outstanding under such existing credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of up to $100 million, (iii) delivery of a report from our auditors in respect of fiscal year 2008 without any “going concern” or like qualification (or receipt of a waiver from certain lenders), and (iv) issuance of the preferred stock under the Investment Agreement. "
Specifically (iii), I don't know how you could BK XM holdings without have "going concern" for the company. Also, why would Liberty dump $150 mil into the XM Credit Agreement for them to file BK?
This, however, is all assuming that the deal cannot still go through and I'm not seeing anything definitive as to why Malone would pull out now? My interpritation of Part III-Narrative (http://investor.sirius.com/secfiling...950123-09-3789) is that if Sirius XM has to include "going concern" then Malone has the option to opt out. At this point though it seems to me the business interest with Sirius XM and Liberty is long term and not short term. If it was only short term I could see Malone opting out, collects in BK before bond holders and gets paid. However, I think there is much more money to be made by both companies by Sirius XM staying out of BK.
Thanks for everyone's input and I agree that the negotiation has to be happening with all involved including the auditors. The process is not punitive just factual. In the end it is... what it is, and KPMG is there to state what will be required for a positive outcome. The rest is about the money...... and who gets what. The Bank Group is led by JPM and is going to want their share of this to extend, or else they'll want their money...
This is definitely why the SP is stuck here at .13. The run up on the Libery deal announcement, the release of the details, the extension with this, and right back down until the Auditor is done.
Hope for the best ...... Plan for the worst.... keep some powder dry for the days leading into the weekend of the 14th of March.... never a dull moment....
No, Malone included the clause because of the JPM $250 mil debt . . . this needs to be extended (assuming they will not be able to pay it off, a reasonable assumption). Not because of a Going Concern question. I think Ma"loan" is not quite right. It should be "Mayloan!"
The question is will they be able to extend the JPM debt? The sentiment here was pretty unanimous that this would be no problem before today. Why is this in doubt now?
985.....not to be too spazzy about this new news, but at .1399, there is not much wiggle room when bk is declared...IMHO
Could be... but if bankruptcy court valued the Sirius licenses to anywhere near the current value of the XM licenses, it changes that picture significantly... as there will be equity left over after the debt claims are taken care off.
The bond holders won't be able to just "take" $5+BB in assets to cover $4+BB in debt -- and keep the rest for themselves.
--------
always wondered now i know:
Meaning
Be prepared and save your resources until they are needed.
Origin
The allusion is to gunpowder which soldiers had to keep dry in order to be ready to fight when required. This advice reputedly originated with Oliver Cromwell during his campaign in Ireland. In Ballads of Ireland (1856), Edward Hayes wrote:
"There is a well-authenticated anecdote of Cromwell. On a certain occasion, when his troops were about crossing a river to attack the enemy, he concluded an address, couched in the usual fanatic terms in use among them, with these words - 'put your trust in God; but mind to keep your powder dry'."
19th century citations of the phrase invariably give the full version - trust in God and keep your powder dry. This emphasizes that the keep your powder dry was seen only as an additional insurance. This is made clear in a piece from The Times Literary Supplement, 1908:
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/217500.html