Page 12 of 60 ... 2101112131422 ...
Results 111 to 120 of 596
  1. trippingthespeculatingpos is offline
    Guru
    trippingthespeculatingpos's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Location: San Antonio Posts: 2,884
    02-16-2009, 06:52 PM #111
    what u guys are not taking into account that this stock is priced well below what a little dilution would do to it, its priced with the idea that siri is going belly up, i guarantee if mel did a r/s without the threat decomplaince he would have to deal with some angry angry shareholder's. Possibly legal action.

  2. Sworntwofun is offline
    Addict
    Sworntwofun's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 588
    02-16-2009, 06:53 PM #112
    Mel clearly stated the purpose of voting on a RS was to have the approval from the stock holders to do so & only to be use to avoid delisting!

  3. trippingthespeculatingpos is offline
    Guru
    trippingthespeculatingpos's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Location: San Antonio Posts: 2,884
    02-16-2009, 06:54 PM #113
    jesus you guys are worse than the yahoo boards now, okay just give in to it then, siri will not go higher than .15 cent's, aww damn that dilution, malone's gonna come in and dilute everything and then were all goign to have worthless stock my god wenfnewfno2fn2en the end is here siri is not filing for bk and were DOOMED!!!

  4. Hopeful is offline
    Addict
    Hopeful's Avatar
    Joined: Nov 2008 Location: Vancouver Island Canada Posts: 583
    02-16-2009, 06:55 PM #114
    Quote Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos View Post
    jesus you guys are worse than the yahoo boards now, okay just give in to it then, siri will not go higher than .15 cent's, aww damn that dilution, malone's gonna come in and dilute everything and then were all goign to have worthless stock my god wenfnewfno2fn2en the end is here siri is not filing for bk and were DOOMED!!!

    Aahahhahaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahhaahahahahahah ahaahahaahahaa!!!

  5. LittleTrader is offline
    Member
    LittleTrader's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 48
    02-16-2009, 06:56 PM #115
    Mel won't do a RS until it's absolutely necessary (which it might be to hammer out this deal), but he knows just like the rest of us that once a RS happens, this stock will get shorted back down to nothing until the company proves they can turn a profit.

    I was also thinking last night about how heavily traded this stock is. Do you guys think that stocks traded this heavily, that are this popular, are the ones that usually make people into millionaires over night? I'm leaning towards no.

    I do think we'll see a significant % pop, and I think this is why institutions are loading up. Just as quickly as you see them pick up 8 million shares, you will see quite a few of these guys drop them like hot cakes once we hit .25 or .30

    That's just how i see this panning out.

    Not trying to be negative, just how i see it. I'm in for 13k shares around .40


  6. winagain35 is offline
    Enthusiast
    winagain35's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2008 Location: Denver, CO Posts: 190
    02-16-2009, 06:58 PM #117
    Quote Originally Posted by Sworntwofun View Post
    Mel clearly stated the purpose of voting on a RS was to have the approval from the stock holders to do so & only to be use to avoid delisting!
    He said that, but it wasn't in the proxy vote. A reverse split isn't inherently bad! It doesn't change the value of your investment at all. And if it's packaged as part of a company stock overhaul, it may be a good thing. The fear is that it gives the shorts more meat to attack, but the company is going to be a much more appealing investment for NEW money as a five dollar stock than it is as a .25 stock.

  7. J56D is offline
    Enthusiast
    J56D's Avatar
    Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 173
    02-16-2009, 06:59 PM #118
    Quote Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos View Post
    they cannot due a r/s for the sake of lowering the outstanding share's

    reason #1 The vote was to allow them to do a r/s for nasdaq complaince only, not for reducing the outstanding share's, if they did it without holding a new vote they would be in a bit of trouble i think.
    As far as I know there were no restrictions on the issuing of additional shares or for the reverse split except for what was said in the proxy.

    2. To approve an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 4,500,000,000 to 8,000,000,000 shares.

    3. To approve an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to (i) effect a reverse stock split of our common stock by a ratio of not less than one-for-ten and not more than one-for-fifty at any time prior to December 31, 2009, with the exact ratio to be set at a whole number within this range to be determined by our board of directors in its discretion, and (ii) reduce the number of authorized shares of our common stock as set forth in the proxy statement

  8. SteveSirius is offline
    Enthusiast
    SteveSirius's Avatar
    Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 136
    02-16-2009, 07:00 PM #119
    I think the guy at Liberty is smarter than to get a lot of stock and unload it into the marketplace. It seems he believes in the merits of Sirius XM. Therefore, no matter how many shares are "issued" to him, if they are not traded, they will not affect the supply/demand ratio on any given day.

    If he truy believes he is making an investment, I would think he would hold any shares he gets until Sirius XM is cooking on all burners, and with the stock price a lot higher. That's what I would do - and I know I'm not nearly as smart as this guy!!!!!

  9. trippingthespeculatingpos is offline
    Guru
    trippingthespeculatingpos's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Location: San Antonio Posts: 2,884
    02-16-2009, 07:02 PM #120
    yes but mel would be publicly going against what he said to investors and this i think would get him into legal trouble, people im done convincing, your obviously set on being skeptical so have fun with it.

Page 12 of 60 ... 2101112131422 ...