Wisconsin Democrats could stay away for weeks

[Havakasha]

8 years ago is "ancient history" to you. LOL. And NOW WE UNDERSTAND WHAT BEING IGNORANT ABOUT THE PAST MEANS. Oh vey.

If you have political history completely wrong WHY would i acknowledge your point as being correct. This is silly.
You didnt even know Bush and the Republicans controlled the entire govt for 6 years until i pointed that out to you

You certainly shot from the hip and came to Walker's defense. "Seems plausible". Thats the point. It isnt close to being plausible.
Its an extreme ideological position and thats why the right wing has made him a hero.

Im glad you understand why it is that we are so polarized today. LOL. You look back 2 years and i look back 50 or more.
History, smistory. Who cares.

[SiriuslyLong]

Providence RI just laid off all 2000 of their teachers. They will hire back the ones they "like". Wow. That's harsh. But it happened at my company very recently.

[Havakasha]

Everything is "totally irrelevant" when you dont want to look at it.

Edit S&L who is willing to edit out ALL OF HISTORY EXCEPT THE PAST 2 YEARS. LOL.

[SiriuslyLong]

8 years ago is "ancient history" to you. LOL. And NOW WE UNDERSTAND WHAT BEING IGNORANT ABOUT THE PAST MEANS. Oh vey.

If you have political history completely wrong WHY would i acknowledge your point as being correct. This is silly.
You didnt even know Bush and the Republicans controlled the entire govt for 6 years until i pointed that out to you

You certainly shot from the hip and came to Walker's defense. "Seems plausible". Thats the point. It isnt close to being plausible.
Its an extreme ideological position and thats why the right wing has made him a hero.

Im glad you understand why it is that we are so polarized today. LOL. You look back 2 years and i look back 50 or more.
History, smistory. Who cares.

You're line of reasoning can go on forever. Face it - Obama came in with a democratically controlled house and senate, and pushed his agenda - some of which is not overly popular. The repukes hardly had a voice. Now they win, and they have a voice. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. Again, Bush has nothing to do with the Obama agenda over the last two years.

It seems plausibe to me and not close to plausible to you. Sie la vie.

If you are so against it, WTF are you doing here arguing with me? Your efforts are needed elsewhere, no?

[Havakasha]

Of course Bush has something to do with the Obama agenda over the last 2 years. If you cant understand that
simple fact of political history your are seriously deluded. You're right that there is no reason to argue wth you
anymore. Good Luck buddy.

My last statement to you
S&L. You are quickly showing your hopelessness. Let me explain this in as clear terms as i can.
When I said "No sorry i wont acknowledge what you are sayIng" I WASNT SAYING I WONT READ WHAT YOU WROTE OR ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR RIGHT TO YOUR POINT OF VIEW. YOU COMPLETELY TWISTED THE MEANING. WHAT I WAS SAYING WAS THAT I WONT ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR POINT
THAT FOR "2 YEARS THE DEMS... HAD THE ULTIMATE POWER TO MOVE THEIR AGENDA FORWARD WITH LITTLE REGARD TO THEIR RIVAL PARTY" ONCE AGAIN THAT IS WAY TOO SIMPLISTIC

If you knew a little history you would know that many Republicans no longer in office (like SEN. Dole and others) who were on the right of their party in their day SAY THAT THE REPUBLICANS HAVE GONE WAY TO THE EXTREME RIGHT AND ARE FIGHTING AGAINST ELEMENTS OF POLICY (including elements of the health care policy which Republcans proposed as little as 8 years ago) THAT "WE" WERE ONLY TOO HAPPY TO SUPPORT.

So you seem to have missed the movement of the Republican Party to the right and therfore mistake what is
truly CENTRIST.

[SiriuslyLong]

S&L. You are quickly showing your hopelessness. Let me explain this in as clear terms as i can.
When is said "No sorry i wont acknowledge what you are sayIng" I WASNT SAYING I WONT READ WHAT YOUG WROTE OR
ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR RIGHT TO YOUR POINT OF VIEW. WHAT I WAS SAYING WAS THAT I WONT ACKNOWLEDE YOUR POINT
THAT FOR "2 YEARS THE DEMS... HAD THE ULTIMATE POWER TO MOVE THEIR AGENDA FORWARD WITH LITTLE REGARD TO THEIR
RIVAL PARTY"

If you knew a little history you would know that many Republicans no longer in office (like SEN. Dole and others) who were on the right of their party SAY THAT THE REPUBLICANS HAVE GONE WAY TO THE RIGHT AND ARE FIGHTING AGAINST ELEMENTS OF POLICY THAT WE WERE ONLY TOO HAPPY TO SUPPORT.

You ignorance on the past is sometimes quite hard to take.

I know what you were saying. There was no need to clarify.

A rolling stone gathers no moss. Welcome to Lloyd's world.

[Havakasha]

And welcome to S&L world where only the last 2 years of history have any meaning for today. Jeez.

[SiriuslyLong]

"Of course Bush has something to do with the Obama agenda over the last 2 years."

Ok, what? Be specific.

What I will agree to is that Bush was a lousy president, and the result was indeed a democratic president, senate and house.

[SiriuslyLong]

And welcome to S&L world where only the last 2 years of history have any meaning for today. Jeez.

No, the last 2 years are simply much more relevent to the conversation today.

[Havakasha]

"Be specfic" LMFAO. Thats it buddy. Im done with you if you cant understand ALL that Bush has to do with the Obama agenda.