
Originally Posted by
underway
Not sure about the accounting of all this..but....I don't think banks can write down performing loans (loans that are not in default). The property value isn't determined until it is sold once again. Or, in a sense if it is appraised due to refi or foreclosure. But, if the loan is performing, there is no reason for the bank to assume the asset has declined or increased in value. But, I'm no banker (thank God!), nor accountant (double thank God!), but I think most of this mess is due to the repackaging of mortgages into large portfolios which were purchased by the huge merchant banks and investment houses and have become worthless because so many of those repackaged subprime notes are NON-performing loans. So, even though 95% of mortgages are performing, a huge percent of those are NOT subprime. Whereas the 5% of repackaged mortgages are mostly, if not all, subprime. They were attractive investments because of their potential high interest rate yields. But, since most of the people who "bought" houses with subprime loans didn't pay their monthly payments, especially as the ARMs adjusted up, the subprime packages of mortgages became worthless or near worthless.