Who's opinion can we trust?

Originally Posted by JohnnyIrishXM

Cos1000

You are dead on ,as was my take also,about extending May debt.I think Tripp,s and John point is we were not going BK because of Feb debt...Remember it has come out Malone approached Mel in late Dec.,and he also looked at 85k net sub add for 4q and didn't blink cause he saw the rest of the books for 4Q ,not sure about annual,Legal ramnifications!I thought the silence was the ploy about bk not being refuted by company,so they could renegotiate content contracts,which they did..

February debt did become an issue that made May the BK concern when GS sold the Feb 127M debt to Ergin and Ergin refused to renegotiate it..... Mel couldn't do both.... in that fact he needed an alternative and Malone's deal became that alternative.... I know that's what John (888's) feels and I have always agreed... GS has been the "Wild Card" and selling their Feb, and I believe $70M of Dec 09 debt to Ergin, managed to make things impossible for Mel to do, without selling the 40% and BS 15% loans to Malone.... Having said that, This Company Was Close To Bankruptcy, there I've said it and feel better for it............

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

how much did u lose on sirius charles since ur so smart?

You can continue to lash out at me or you can address the issue at hand. What I have lost in SIRI (which was a long time ago and literally less then 10% of my yearly income now) I have more then made back with other stocks. I had a 300% run on BAC over the last couple of weeks which is more then I could have made here with SIRI.

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

You can label me whatever u want

This song isn't about you.

That said....it is up to each individual here to investigate what is written here and look up information at various sites before making any kind of financial decision.[/quote]

very sound advice for everyone to follow....

Originally Posted by cos1000

Interestingly Charles, your thread is "Who's opinion can we trust?" , but your detailed comment underneath asks the question of, in general, who's opinion is valuable? If your goal is to set a few "names in stone" for future reference why be so vague to begin with?? Trust and Value could be the same thing.... but not necessarily... For me Trust is a very, very long term characteristic that I bestow, but on a few....

In, sticking with the topic of Sirius, I would say that none other than Mr. Tyler Savery deserves that honor for his consistent reporting of the facts. He has alway been level headed in his assessment of how those facts will affect investors and given timely information for them to make their own decisions. No one individual has done a better job. Whether it be before the merger in informing all who were invested, or after the merger when silence from the company was the most ominous sign of things ahead. Tyler has always presented a realistic view of what is, giving investors an opportunity to decipher what might be.... Here's to You Tyler..... Thanks.

what he said!!

Originally Posted by SiriusBuzz

Thats all... and the fact that you see it and tripping continues to carry on is quite telling. Rather then admitting that being objectionable is good for investing, people will fight to the death and discredit anything negative.

John points out that they had cash and didnt need the loan... if they used the cash what would they be using now? You can't make yourself cash poor.

Rather then acknowleging the issue of 85k adds in the christmas quarter people cherry pick the points they want to discredit but, you can't argue with 85k subs when 10x that was the norm for past 4th quarters.

i discredit your negative views SELL..SELLL...SELL

Originally Posted by doobz26

Demian is a little overly optimistic and thinks Mel and company can do no wrong (he has a photo gallery of his satrad hardware). Relmor is a little schizophrenic.

Overly optimistic?

You mean when I was predicting a pullback and sold all my shares @ .30?

You mean because I have no position in SIRI now?

When I was slamming the company's channel change decisions and I said it had the potential to cause massive cancelations and hinder future sub growth?

When I was slamming the company's marketing and PR departments?

Overly optimistic?

Originally Posted by SiriusBuzz

I had a 300% run on BAC over the last couple of weeks which is more then I could have made here with SIRI.

What are you talking about? You could have had an 800% run on Sirius over the past couple of weeks! I have... (in at 0.058 and out at 0.35... ok, I guess that is ONLY 700%)

Originally Posted by SiriusBuzz

Thats all... and the fact that you see it and tripping continues to carry on is quite telling. Rather then admitting that being objectionable is good for investing, people will fight to the death and discredit anything negative.

John points out that they had cash and didnt need the loan... if they used the cash what would they be using now? You can't make yourself cash poor.

Rather then acknowleging the issue of 85k adds in the christmas quarter people cherry pick the points they want to discredit but, you can't argue with 85k subs when 10x that was the norm for past 4th quarters.

Holy crap, how wrong could you get it. I did not say that SIRIXM did not need the loan. What I said was that all the crap the MSM was putting out about them going bankrupt because of Feb debt was a bunch of crap. Which as we all know now, it was. I believe it was Ergen that caused the whole possiblitity of a bankruptcy. That if he would have kept is paws off, Mel would have been fine. This thread explains it all:

http://siriusbuzz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1546


There has been evidence out so far that it was a correct opinion.

do i have to quote you using my name there charles? the song may not be about me but certain verses are. I still have yet to hear you say something positive, i have admitted plenty of negatives, and the fact that u started this website and u listen 6 hours a day does not count, something positive plz. on another note i found it hard not to be positive about the "stock" at .15 and under, turned out i was right.

relmor's dead on about trusting the media........................ always follow the money, and hidden agendas, worse than politicians......... at least they have a label up front. That said, I must agree with Cos1000 { I know---- surprise, surprise }, on his take on Tyler Savery................... He's as good as it gets. For my money I'll take the advice from the Battle commanders and sirius buzz folk ANY day. KUDOS. Getting close to the opening bell, must tend to the Dog. Best of luck today everyone. ..killer.

Tyler failed to mention possible scenarios on how the merger would close. And never once mentioned further dilution from the deal would crush the price. Tylers articles are barely useful.

Originally Posted by john

Holy crap, how wrong could you get it. I did not say that SIRIXM did not need the loan. What I said was that all the crap the MSM was putting out about them going bankrupt because of Feb debt was a bunch of crap.

Fair enough, I got dates mixed up. Most people were screaming about the cash on hand and why weren't they using it but, IMO using that cash was never a viable option. I didnt realize you were citing a specific example.

Originally Posted by Newman

What are you talking about? You could have had an 800% run on Sirius over the past couple of weeks! I have... (in at 0.058 and out at 0.35... ok, I guess that is ONLY 700%)

I wouldn't have touched this stock at .05 with your money nevermind my money. Sure, things would have worked out if you did but it was too risky IMO. BTW, if you knew to buy at .058 and sell at .35, people should be following your every word.

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

do i have to quote you using my name there charles? the song may not be about me but certain verses are.

Never in the start of this thread did I mention anyone specifically. I did not address you personally until you made this thread about you.

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

I still have yet to hear you say something positive, i have admitted plenty of negatives, and the fact that

And you wont right now because I don't believe in the viability of this company as it stands today. They have a compelling product which I listen to everyday but, IMO that is not going to be enough.

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

u started this website and u listen 6 hours a day does not count, something positive plz.

That doesnt count? Really? I guess we have to agree to disagree.

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

on another note i found it hard not to be positive about the "stock" at .15 and under, turned out i was right.

You were really right if you sold at .40... if you are still holding... we will have to wait and see. A lot of that initial gain is being given up... but I am sure you sold right at .40 because you nail these kinds of things.