Page 21 of 35 ... 11192021222331 ...
Results 201 to 210 of 348
  1. relmor2003 is offline
    Mentor
    relmor2003's Avatar
    Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,937
    03-06-2009, 06:58 PM #201
    Quote Originally Posted by homer985 View Post
    With the current economy and current state of the OEM's -- I think that $3BB could be doable by the end of Summer. Which would be about $0.44... but that is under current conditions. If the economy improves then more -- but if it worsens, then less (obviously).

    I think $6BB would be in a year with the economy rebounding, the OEM's rebounding and the synergies fully realized... that takes it near $1. If growth comes back at a manageable cost on top of this? Then perhaps a $8-9BB MC down the line.

    If Sirius ever hopes to get the pps to a price where Funds can buy it and really invest in it -- then they have to get the pps above $5. To do that, they need to do a 1 for 25 split this year. Yes, that drastic. That would take the number of fully diluted shares down to 272MM -- which would make the stock very difficult to manipulate. While leaving enough liquidity in it to keep it attractive to traders. While the current pps would only increase to $3.50 initially -- with growth, it would likely go above $5 on its own as that would only be a $1.3BB market cap. A $5BB MC at that sharecount would grow the pps to $18.

    The RS has to happen with this fully diluted sharecount now.

    -------
    Thank you Homer for taking the time to write this. You are a bit under my very conservative estimate. But not too far off longer term. I will copy and paste this post to the other thread for all investors to see. If you dont mind?

  2. sl62 is offline
    Addict
    sl62's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Windy C. Posts: 644
    03-06-2009, 07:01 PM #202
    Get ready folks...

    Fast Money is reporting a possible move upcoming that will suspend Mark to Market temporarily. If that happens, tack on another 1500pts to the Dow...

    Personally, I have no clue why we didn't do this sooner. I think it's just taken this long for them to realize it's the ONLY bullet that will take pressure of this capital requirement issue, which is just clogging up everything. It's either that or let everything else come down farther to adjust to real-time values. How stupid would that be since those values will then be going back up. Why should we have to bear further pain when it's unnecessary and an ephemeral state of being anyway. Then housing bottoms and when mark to market is put back in 2010, capital requirements are more in line with less pain. What else can stop the shorts?? A: nothing.

  3. relmor2003 is offline
    Mentor
    relmor2003's Avatar
    Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,937
    03-06-2009, 07:03 PM #203
    Quote Originally Posted by sl62 View Post
    Get ready folks...

    Fast Money is reporting a possible move upcoming that will suspend Mark to Market temporarily. If that happens, tack on another 1500pts to the Dow...

    Personally, I have no clue why we didn't do this sooner. I think it's just taken this long for them to realize it's the ONLY bullet that will take pressure of this capital requirement issue, which is just clogging up everything. It's either that or let everything else come down farther to adjust to real-time values. How stupid would that be since those values will then be going back up. Why should we have to bear further pain when it's unnecessary and an ephemeral state of being anyway. Then housing bottoms and when mark to market is put back in 2010, capital requirements are more in line with less pain. What else can stop the shorts?? A: nothing.
    News ive been waiting for, and why I am long UYG, and BAC since 3 days ago.
    Wonderful news. About time. I hope they do it. I really do. Bad bank, somethign needs to be done NOW, NOT LATER.

  4. john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    03-06-2009, 07:08 PM #204
    Holy crap that is the best news I have heard in a long time. I also agree the Bank bailout would not have been so big if they would have just done this along with a few other things in the first place. This would do more to free up the credit freeze then the bail out did.

    The only thing is I heard that before, I just hope it happens this time around.

  5. sl62 is offline
    Addict
    sl62's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Windy C. Posts: 644
    03-06-2009, 07:09 PM #205
    Quote Originally Posted by relmor2003 View Post
    Thank you Homer for taking the time to write this. You are a bit under my very conservative estimate. But not too far off longer term. I will copy and paste this post to the other thread for all investors to see. If you dont mind?
    Relmor...

    All respect to Homer, but these numbers are not the gospel. Further, I'm not so sure about a strategy of reversing to $3.50, hoping it will reach $5. I would envision a higher ratio than 1:25. But spread the word if you want to..still many variables going on (hedges, et al). I for one, will not be relying on nominal fundmentals with this stock. I can't remember a time when they have much applied in this SP. MHO...and again, no offense.

  6. sl62 is offline
    Addict
    sl62's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Windy C. Posts: 644
    03-06-2009, 07:12 PM #206
    888's...

    Have you seen cos1000 lately?? He's MIA...

  7. Brandon Matthews is offline
    Banned
    Brandon Matthews's Avatar
    Joined: Aug 2008 Location: Northeast Posts: 721
    03-06-2009, 07:13 PM #207
    Brandon Matthews reporting for my beating!

  8. relmor2003 is offline
    Mentor
    relmor2003's Avatar
    Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,937
    03-06-2009, 07:17 PM #208
    Quote Originally Posted by sl62 View Post
    Relmor...

    All respect to Homer, but these numbers are not the gospel. Further, I'm not so sure about a strategy of reversing to $3.50, hoping it will reach $5. I would envision a higher ratio than 1:25. But spread the word if you want to..still many variables going on (hedges, et al). I for one, will not be relying on nominal fundmentals with this stock. I can't remember a time when they have much applied in this SP. MHO...and again, no offense.
    No I know that. I just wanted everyones opinion that knows more than me heard. He knows more than I do, so I value the input. As do you , cos1000, and John. Im not saying my market cap opinion is worthless, its just not worth "more than his". But I agree, my views on the R/S I will get into later. Really dont want to jump right to that issue. Going to let this all sink in first, and enjoy my weekend. I feel .70 cents is not an issue if MM's allow true value, but they wont get it there "overnight" either.

  9. sl62 is offline
    Addict
    sl62's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Windy C. Posts: 644
    03-06-2009, 07:17 PM #209
    Quote Originally Posted by Brandon Matthews View Post
    Brandon Matthews reporting for my beating!
    Brandon, my friend!!

    How are you feeling today?? Kinda sucks to be you today..

  10. relmor2003 is offline
    Mentor
    relmor2003's Avatar
    Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,937
    03-06-2009, 07:18 PM #210
    Quote Originally Posted by Brandon Matthews View Post
    Brandon Matthews reporting for my beating!
    Just read back posts sir, and drop your pants!!!
    LOL

    I admire you for showing up. Good man.
    Now take of your pants, and bend over sir, your going to get the beating of your life!!! You must be a masacist.LOL

Page 21 of 35 ... 11192021222331 ...