Page 16 of 44 ... 6141516171826 ...
Results 151 to 160 of 432
  1. FoolNHisMoney is offline
    Enthusiast
    FoolNHisMoney's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 136
    03-05-2009, 02:04 AM #151
    Of course, I ride Suzuki now though!

  2. killerkaul is offline
    Enthusiast
    killerkaul's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 156
    03-05-2009, 02:07 AM #152
    Baba........... have to check out your steamer.......... could be the same ship my dad's father came over on from Germany/Russia. Sl62............ you've got a great ride also. Time to turn in............ see you early morn everyone. Great discussion. Goodnite. ..killer and the Dog.

  3. Brandon Matthews is offline
    Banned
    Brandon Matthews's Avatar
    Joined: Aug 2008 Location: Northeast Posts: 721
    03-05-2009, 02:12 AM #153
    Quote Originally Posted by homer985 View Post
    Yes, if you believe that RETAIL adds ZERO subscribers in 2009 - then this is possible.

    20MM subs with a 1.7% churn is 4MM lost subs in 2009;

    9.1MM OEM run rate, with a 50% installation rate and a 50% takeup rate;
    leaves 2.28MM OEM additions in 2009

    Difference is 1.72MM lost subs for 2009. If you believe that RETAIL has ZERO adds in 2009, then you will have your 2 million lost subscribers in 2009.

    However, an average of 500K new retail subs per quarter, would put 2009 totals into the positive.

    Yes, completely disagree with your assessment.


    -----
    Apparently Homer, you do not completely disagree. In fact you acknowledge that you concur on nearly every point. I didn't want to see the result that I came up with using the very same methodology. It pained me to pen the article I wrote tonight but it had to be written, which will be published tomorrow.

    500k new retail sales would be needed to break even is a stretch. Sirius added only 107,000 in Q3 2008. So yes indeed, retail in negligible.

    (http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...32887/d10q.htm)

  4. FoolNHisMoney is offline
    Enthusiast
    FoolNHisMoney's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 136
    03-05-2009, 02:19 AM #154
    Quote Originally Posted by homer985 View Post
    Yes, if you believe that RETAIL adds ZERO subscribers in 2009 - then this is possible.

    20MM subs with a 1.7% churn is 4MM lost subs in 2009;

    9.1MM OEM run rate, with a 50% installation rate and a 50% takeup rate;
    leaves 2.28MM OEM additions in 2009

    Difference is 1.72MM lost subs for 2009. If you believe that RETAIL has ZERO adds in 2009, then you will have your 2 million lost subscribers in 2009.

    However, an average of 500K new retail subs per quarter, would put 2009 totals into the positive.

    Yes, completely disagree with your assessment.


    -----
    A churn rate of 1.7% or self-pay subs adds up to about 3.2 million or so lost subs for the year. Even with 9.1 SAAR we should see an add of 2+ million as you state. Now we have to assume that retail sales will add something to the numbers, so no way in hell could we lose 2 mil subs overall. Keep in mind that penetration rate is also on the rise - should be well over 50% for 09, maybe even 60%. IMO retail sales is where they will need to concentrate this year as auto sales are not looking like they will pick up substantially this year. Go iPhone app!

  5. killerkaul is offline
    Enthusiast
    killerkaul's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 156
    03-05-2009, 02:20 AM #155
    FoolNhisMoney.................. my first bike was a 1969 TS 250 Suzuki Savage two stroke single cylinder enduro. It was a great motorcycle. My twin also had a Suzuki. My friends and I all had dirt bikes. We rode all over the Black Hills on them all through high school. Homework ? What homework ? Those were the days. Goodnite buddy.

  6. FoolNHisMoney is offline
    Enthusiast
    FoolNHisMoney's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 136
    03-05-2009, 02:22 AM #156
    Quote Originally Posted by Brandon Matthews View Post
    Apparently Homer, you do not completely disagree. In fact you acknowledge that you concur on nearly every point. I didn't want to see the result that I came up with using the very same methodology. It pained me to pen the article I wrote tonight but it had to be written, which will be published tomorrow.

    500k new retail sales would be needed to break even is a stretch. Sirius added only 107,000 in Q3 2008. So yes indeed, retail in negligible.

    (http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...32887/d10q.htm)
    Brandon, net adds was 344K in Q3

    retail-149,416
    oem492,215
    rental1,282
    net adds344,081

    retail lost net, but I figure gross retail sales had to be in the 200k range.

  7. Sirius_Long_Hauler is offline
    Enthusiast
    Sirius_Long_Hauler's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 139
    03-05-2009, 02:32 AM #157
    So what's the conclusion after all this speculation... sit tight and wait for the 17th? No reason to panic?

  8. FoolNHisMoney is offline
    Enthusiast
    FoolNHisMoney's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 136
    03-05-2009, 02:40 AM #158
    Quote Originally Posted by killerkaul View Post
    FoolNhisMoney.................. my first bike was a 1969 TS 250 Suzuki Savage two stroke single cylinder enduro. It was a great motorcycle. My twin also had a Suzuki. My friends and I all had dirt bikes. We rode all over the Black Hills on them all through high school. Homework ? What homework ? Those were the days. Goodnite buddy.
    Funny, I actually still own a 2001 650 Suzuki Savage thumper (gotta love that single cylinder torque!). I only rode it a couple of times since I bought it for a friend who still has the bike. Long story there, but one day I'll get it back. I started on dirtbikes as well, though my dad wouldn't let me get one in high school. It sucked eating dirtbike dust on a moped! I had to ride my buddies' bikes until I turned 18 and could buy one myself.

  9. just sirius is offline
    Mentor
    just sirius's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Location: San Antonio Posts: 1,209
    03-05-2009, 02:42 AM #159
    Brandon/Homer

    Don't disagree with your numbers per se. Split the difference. SiriusXM loses .75M subs in 2009. Thats 95M in revenue lost. I would think that with the synergies that are being realized, that number is acceptable in this market. Also, add in new revenue streams...internet...increased $ for family plan, B of B... advertising(maybe)...revenue may actually increase. Loss of subs not necessarily a death sentence. I agree Brandon, would definitely hurt, but not insurmountable. IMO Also, 9.1M autos is low end. Sales push for retail cranking up...250-350K new retail per qtr not out of the question. again IMO

  10. just sirius is offline
    Mentor
    just sirius's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Location: San Antonio Posts: 1,209
    03-05-2009, 02:45 AM #160
    FoolN

    I believe that Brandon was meaning only 100K of retail subs for 3rd qtr. Not total subs!

Page 16 of 44 ... 6141516171826 ...