Page 10 of 26 ... 8910111220 ...
Results 91 to 100 of 255
  1. voogru is offline
    Member
    voogru's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 73
    06-26-2009, 04:35 PM #91
    Quote Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos View Post
    20mm just went through at .36 right after 7 mil at .44, still huge huge volujke going on here

  2. imromo24 is offline
    Guru
    imromo24's Avatar
    Joined: Aug 2008 Location: Steeler Town, MI Posts: 2,524
    06-26-2009, 04:35 PM #92
    wow, that was f'd up!!!!

  3. imromo24 is offline
    Guru
    imromo24's Avatar
    Joined: Aug 2008 Location: Steeler Town, MI Posts: 2,524
    06-26-2009, 04:36 PM #93
    im showing 364,000,000 volume????????????????

  4. atmgeek1 is offline
    Senior Member
    atmgeek1's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2009 Location: Baltimore Posts: 303
    06-26-2009, 04:37 PM #94
    I left my desk @ 3:15 and we were at about 92 mil. in volume. WTF was that!!! I've only held this stock since Feb. and I dont recall a jump like that ever, not even during the sell off @ .63. I don't have all the fancy lookup gadgets but how many trades took place to get the extra 250 mil. shares traded. Was it one huge dump?

  5. trippingthespeculatingpos is offline
    Guru
    trippingthespeculatingpos's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Location: San Antonio Posts: 2,884
    06-26-2009, 04:40 PM #95
    guys i could be wrong but this could be the prelude to something big.

  6. stang3O2 is offline
    Senior Member
    stang3O2's Avatar
    Joined: Nov 2008 Location: Indy/LA/chi/ny Posts: 422
    06-26-2009, 04:41 PM #96
    it was the russel index rebalance, I just hope this doesnt take away all chances of a short covering, but it probably did.

  7. bassmaster is offline
    Mentor
    bassmaster's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 1,216
    06-26-2009, 04:42 PM #97
    holding strong at .44 in AH....the thing is the drop which may have been caused by russell index rebalance triggered a SHITLOAD of stop limit orders. but it is all healthy no manipulation in my opinion..but wtf do i know

  8. voogru is offline
    Member
    voogru's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 73
    06-26-2009, 04:44 PM #98
    Quote Originally Posted by stang3O2 View Post
    it was the russel index rebalance, I just hope this doesnt take away all chances of a short covering, but it probably did.
    http://www.nasdaq.net/PublicPages/Ru...Rebalance.aspx

  9. bassmaster is offline
    Mentor
    bassmaster's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 1,216
    06-26-2009, 04:47 PM #99
    Quote Originally Posted by stang3O2 View Post
    it was the russel index rebalance, I just hope this doesnt take away all chances of a short covering, but it probably did.
    agreed....man we need some transparency in this market for retailers. we wont find out if this was the exit for shorts, but it happened so fast maybe most didnt catch it, unless they had trailing stops on the way up which brought the price back up to .44


    hey irish , i hate bugging you , but your hella smarter than i am with siri...when we dropped to .25 before the big run up to .63 , is this a similiar pattern?

  10. Siriusowner is offline
    Addict
    Siriusowner's Avatar
    Joined: Nov 2008 Location: The Oil Patch, Texas Posts: 922
    06-26-2009, 04:50 PM #100
    Quote Originally Posted by underway View Post
    what's your explanation? please don't say manipulation again. Jeez. I mean, perhaps it is, but, why is profit taking not a serious possiblity? That's exactly what happens when someone sells a lot of stock to take profit. The value drops as the order fills up until the lowest sale price the seller will accept. I really don't see why this price drop is attributed to manipulation without any thought that market forces could have been in play. JMHO.
    Do you know what a market maker is ?

    Who do you think you are selling to when you are selling and buying from when you buy ? Not me or anybody on this site that's for sure.

Page 10 of 26 ... 8910111220 ...