His article is weak because he sounds like a ranting shareholder. There is a solid point to be made but it looks like he is ranting for an email he is about to rapid fire off. Rather then taking the time to write something solid. I am sure he wont admit it but, I bet that article went together in under 10 minutes from when he first started writing it.
BTW the final article on satwaves has been edited a tiny bit from the original article, so, ask him why? If what he wrote on SB was the best he could do, why change it?
I almost branched it off into its own thread but I figured the market was closed and you would let it slide just this once.