Page 3 of 7 12345 ...
Results 21 to 30 of 69
  1. Brandon Matthews is offline
    Banned
    Brandon Matthews's Avatar
    Joined: Aug 2008 Location: Northeast Posts: 721
    04-04-2009, 06:32 PM #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Joeboo1 View Post
    Seriously, Is this guy for real Brandon? I read a few posts he made on this site he sounds sociopathic. If I was that lady I would get a restraining order on this cat. Is he a major shareholder? His rants appear that he owns 49.9 percent of the company. I think instead of dealing with the SEC about the MM's maybe we should focus on shutting this clown down. 1st amendment considered but Shamooooone! And yes Shamoooone is a word that will be added to Websters dictionary sometime in the near future as soon as I can get Mr. Hartleib on the case.
    I'm sure there are a few stalker/harrassment laws that he is guilty of. This latest letter that he submitted not only to his loyal followers but posted on the yahoo boards is an admission of guilt.

    I wonder when he will get his followers to commit mass suicide?

  2. homer985 is offline
    Senior Member
    homer985's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 485
    04-04-2009, 06:35 PM #22
    Being in the media biz... as soon as someone tells you not to call that number any more, that means the line is drawn -- and it becomes against the law for that person to do it again. The fact that he not only called again -- but TWO times should be clear indication of what kind of person this Hartleib is. He broke the law TWO TIMES by calling this person again.

    Regardless of what Calderone did or didn't do -- or what she knew or didn't know -- this should be a serious red flag to those even thinking of being in Hartleib's camp. I've said this guy is a loose cannon; and now he has shown that he has no problem breaking the law to achieve his objective. Two wrongs don't make a right.

    What Hartleib did is wrong - regardless of Calderone. If she says not to call her at home, he cannot do it. Period. He has broken the law.

    Remember that, all of you in his camp. What other law is he about to break? Where else is he going to lead you? Have you prepared yourself for the possible legal action against YOU for if/when he does something even worse?

    I feel for you if you have not.


    -----------

  3. Joeboo1 is offline
    Member
    Joeboo1's Avatar
    Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 93
    04-04-2009, 06:37 PM #23
    Quote Originally Posted by SiriusXMInvestor View Post
    Because they are guilty as charged. You folks just don't get it. Rhyu and Calderone are no longer with SiriusXM.....former Accountants to the company. They left abruptly on there own. That alone raises red flags. Put it all together and it equals Sirius problems for the company.

    Incase you haven't heard the news I believe Sirius slashed nearly 30 percent of their workforce. Redundancy is dominant when two companies merge. Attrition is the result. Reading anymore into this without proof is nothing less than idle gossip and innuendo. Something that could be considered slanderous if you were to elaborate on your point just a bit more. Enlighten me did these two people resign? You are stating they left on their own. You seem very knowledgable on this whole subject I would like to hear all about it if you care to share.

  4. homer985 is offline
    Senior Member
    homer985's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 485
    04-04-2009, 06:40 PM #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Joeboo1 View Post
    Enlighten me did these two people resign? You are stating they left on their own. You seem very knowledgable on this whole subject I would like to hear all about it if you care to share.
    His claim to know more about this, would be admission to possessing insider information if true.

    He has no problem breaking the law by openly admitting to harrassment, so it should be no surprise to see him claim to have insider information too.



    ----------

  5. buddylee is offline
    Member
    buddylee's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Shreveport, LA Posts: 74
    04-04-2009, 06:52 PM #25
    We shall soon see. Hartlieb and Michael Moore will be making a documentary on how MEL and co. screwed us all out of billions of dollars. Because remember we never had a chance to close out our positions in this stock.

    Oh by the way, sorry If mentioning Michael Moore offends anyone. Everybody sure has been on the rag lately. Sorry I shouldn't have said that either.

  6. homer985 is offline
    Senior Member
    homer985's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 485
    04-04-2009, 06:54 PM #26
    Being a resident of California, perhaps Hartleib should familiarize himself with California law:

    California Penal Code section 653m

    653m. (a) Every person who, with intent to annoy, telephones or
    makes contact by means of an electronic communication device with
    another and addresses to or about the other person any obscene
    language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict
    injury to the person or property of the person addressed or any
    member of his or her family, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in
    this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
    contacts made in good faith.
    (b) Every person who makes repeated telephone calls or makes
    repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with
    intent to annoy another person at his or her residence, is, whether
    or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or
    electronic contact, guilty of a misdemeanor.
    Nothing in this
    subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts
    made in good faith.
    (c) Every person who makes repeated telephone calls or makes
    repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with
    the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work is
    guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one
    thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail for
    not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

    Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
    electronic contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies
    only if one or both of the following circumstances exist:
    (1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any
    other court order, or any combination of these court orders, in
    effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
    (2) The person makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated
    contact by means of an electronic communication device with the
    intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work, totaling
    more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation
    ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the
    repeated telephone calls or electronic contacts are made to the
    workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse,
    former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the
    person has a child or has had a dating or engagement relationship or
    is having a dating or engagement relationship.
    (d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to
    have been committed where the telephone call or calls were made or
    received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
    communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed
    to have been committed when the electronic communication or
    communications were originally sent or first viewed by the recipient.

    (e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person
    acting with intent to annoy makes a telephone call requesting a
    return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a),
    (b), or (c) upon receiving the return call.
    (f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of
    sentence is suspended, for any person convicted under this section,
    the court may order as a condition of probation that the person
    participate in counseling.
    (g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic
    communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones,
    cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, or pagers.
    "Electronic communication" has the same meaning as the term defined
    in Subsection 12 of Section 2510 of Title 18 of the United States
    Code.



    -------------

  7. homer985 is offline
    Senior Member
    homer985's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 485
    04-04-2009, 06:55 PM #27
    Quote Originally Posted by buddylee View Post
    We shall soon see. Hartlieb and Michael Moore will be making a documentary on how MEL and co. screwed us all out of billions of dollars. Because remember we never had a chance to close out our positions in this stock.

    Oh by the way, sorry If mentioning Michael Moore offends anyone. Everybody sure has been on the rag lately. Sorry I shouldn't have said that either.
    You sound like you're in Hartleib's group... I feel sorry for you...



    --------

  8. buddylee is offline
    Member
    buddylee's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Shreveport, LA Posts: 74
    04-04-2009, 06:57 PM #28
    Not at all. That was an attempt at sacracsm, apparently I failed miserably.

  9. homer985 is offline
    Senior Member
    homer985's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 485
    04-04-2009, 07:00 PM #29
    Sorry, then... as a shareholder, this guy really boils my blood. He deserves everything coming to him.

  10. Brandon Matthews is offline
    Banned
    Brandon Matthews's Avatar
    Joined: Aug 2008 Location: Northeast Posts: 721
    04-04-2009, 07:04 PM #30
    Quote Originally Posted by homer985 View Post
    Sorry, then... as a shareholder, this guy really boils my blood. He deserves everything coming to him.
    Likewise. Know that this thread, the YAHOO thread as well as copies of the letters he has sent to Sirius shareholders today have been forwarded to the right people.

Page 3 of 7 12345 ...