I disagree with his tactics. I prefer how I go about it. I choose to own the stock, therefore I choose to risk conspiracies amonst wall street partners, CEO's, and good ole boy network. Its same in every industry, in every profession on the planet. In my industry, I deal with false complaints, advertising wars, price wars, collusion amonst competitors, etc.... Its a cut throat business, and usually the stockholder gets screwed. Yes Mr. Harlieb, it happens. Everything you say is probably true. So? Really? Auditors lie? I dont believe it!! Do you really think 2 quarters ago, GM's auditors thought they were doing just dandy, and no warning from them. Why arent they being sued? Because their stockholders should know the risks of their company, without an auditor to tell them so. Mr. Hartlieb you sound like a whiny little bitch, and you need to be instructed on the proper ways of the world. Keep your stock. Compile your case. Average down. If the company never recovers(sp wise), then sue. But your spitting your nose to bite your face(I think I messed that up terribly).
Funny thing is , I dont really disagree with everything he says. A lot of the time, it makes sense(John, go ahead and attack this point, im waiting,

). But his lawsuits are completely selfserving, and proves he cares nothing for the stockholder. In fact, hes probably (in my opinion with no facts) working for the NAB of another party to try to make SiriusXM waste money.