Originally Posted by
GoHerdGreg
The ones who had direct hands in guiding the company toward stupid contracts with the UAW and others, no, they should not be paid. Their work actually helped bring down the company.
If you produced a million dollars, yet what you did also resulted (directly or indirectly) in the company losing billions of dollars…should you get a bonus?
What exactly for?
Where I work, I only get a bonus based on how we (the company) actually do overall, as in profit-and-loss. No profit, no bonus.
It really is that simple.
No argument here. AIG is/was too big, and never should have risen to that level to begin with. Hindsight is a razor-sharp 20/20.
Not so fast. This issue is more than about bonuses. It is about businesses being run in a proper, ethical fashion.
Rampant greed is neither proper, nor ethical.
A bonus for helping the company (AIG) declare record losses is absolutely absurd. Name one other company that rewards employees for helping the company lose billions of dollars and fail.
You can't.
And that's the crux of the matter, here. Somewhere along the journey we convinced ourselves that we deserved rewards without any risk at all. AIG employees actually had contracts written specifying bonuses regardless of the profit/loss of the company.
Where's the risk in that? There is none.
And, as you and I know, the real world is full of risk. AIG is not the real world, and therefore cannot be defended.
IMHO.