Am I missing something?
If this is a 2008 accounting why does the Liberty deal get a mention? Is this just news or are the figures factored into 2008 accounting?
Didn't that deal happen in 2009?
Or does this mean that Mel did this deal in 2008?
Or was this mentioned now to try keep the ship afloat and pacify analysts and the Street?
I would have thought the report would have been only 2008 numbers and the 1Q in 2009 would dazzle everyone with the Liberty infusion.
Koop
In 2007, sirius had 9,238,715 retail subs
In 2008, sirius had 8,905,087 retail subs.
A net loss of 333,628 retail subs. In other words, retail subs are negligible. Anyone that thinks Sirius can add 2 million retail subs is nuts.
In 2007, sirius had 8,033,268 oem subs
In 2008, sirius had 9,995,953 oem subs
A net gain of 1,962,685 oem subs.
Hi, So 1.6 million more people just had it installed when they bought their car? Since we know car sales are down people are getting it when they buy the car rather then retail after.
could someone please post the entire WSJ article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1236...googlenews_wsj
Thanks!
Hey Rick, I just want to say thanks for distilling some excerpts from the 228 page report, especially the one about the effects of a reverse split. I'm a novice at investing and I understood how a reverse split works, but I knew almost nothing about the larger implications of a reverse spilt. Thank you very much for posting that and your other excerpts in this thread.
Quite alot of subs canceled there contracts because they didn't like when Sirius took away there favorite XM channels.
Enough with the word negligible.
Sirius did not break out gross vs net. They may have had Gross of 600k & had churn of 933k to net 333k. Don't you understand this concept ?
I agree they have to increase the retail additions in order to stabilize and grow the subs and revenue. And we need OEM's production and penetration rates to increase y/y.
The take rate also dropped a bit, but this was expected to a certain account because of the mix of lower end cars and poor economy.
Your still talking Apples and Oranges and trying to pull smoke and mirrors on everyone with your trying to explain your way out of the 2 million sub loss prediction you stated (your opinion) for 2009.
COH
So . . if COH at end of Q4 was $380mm then $20mm was added over Q3
Also, adding in $78mm leftover from the initial Malone infusion . . . COH today should be somewhere around $460mm