Originally Posted by
RickF
Hey Bill!!
Here's a question ..... this stock used to be in the $2 to $3 range (july / aug 08). It had the same debt that it does now (actually - i think it has less now?), the credit markets were better and impending disaster was not eminent, we have more subs now, the co is hopefully gathering more cash via the internet sub cost, assuming the cash crunch is taken care of ie new debt terms with extended terms ..... Why shouldn't this stock go back to a similar trading value .... $2 .. $3???
I realize that all of the neg press and near disaster will give the willy's to some investors but if the co was properly priced share wise before ????
So ..... whats is your take ... for that matter, it might be interesting to everyone view on this??