At least 70% of South American immigrants are dumb twits or just lazy.

Dont think so, well here read this first and see if what they do makes any sense WHAT SO EVER.


First, we start with the fact that they are all coming here for a better life, we can all agree with that right, OK.

Second, that means ether:

1) That their life sucks so bad that they cant make a living working 16 hours a day or cant get a job.


OR


2) That their life sucks so bad because the benefits are to little for them to make it.

So that gets us into the why does their life suck???? I think we can all agree that every South American government they come from, has a very socailist leaning government.

So the basic reason is because the governments suck.

So ether they are coming here to work hard for a better life OR the benefits there suck.


That means the ones that come here for the first reason (want to work hard for a better life). Came here to escape the terrible living conditions in their country. So what makes 70% of them, dumb twits???? here is the reason 70% of them leave their own country because they cane make a living there under the socailist government and what do they do when they get here and can vote. YES that is right they vote for the very same people (liberial democrats) that want the same kind of government they just got through escaping from. Heres a clue you dumb twits, if you dont like the polocies of your government then you vote to change them. Now if you cant and you come to another country, THEN YOU DONT VOTE FOR THE SAME TYPE OF PEOPLE THAT SCREWED YOUR PREVIOUS COUNTRY UP WITH THE SAME DUMBASSED POLOCIES. Here get a clue, if you frick this country up TOO then you wont have another one to run to. Do you get it, you dumb twits.

Now on to the others.

That means second reason, (the benefits are not good enough) because they are just looking for a BETTER free ride, now that they have used up the wealth of their own country and just want a better free ride here. That puts them in the not dumb catagory but puts them in the lazy catagory.


I say ether way we are better off without at least 70% of them and should keep them out.

Listen these people should know better then most U.S. Americans why socialism does not work and must be dumb twits or just lazy to want to vote for the very same people that want the same polocies that fricked up their own country.

They are as stupid as the people that move out of one state because they are taxed to much and the economy sucks TO a state where taxes are lower and has a better economy AND THEN vote for the very same people in the new state that fricked up their old state they just left. Just look at Virgina as an example, Just look at FL. as an example.

Well that, and the government is extremely corrupt and in the case of Chavez, the guy is essentially a dictator. But you do make a fantastic point.

Are socialism and corruption connected?

Return of the Death Squads
Honduran oligarchs target members of the National Front of Popular Resistance.

By Jeremy Kryt

http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/...e_death_squads


TEGUCIGALPA, HONDURAS--Late in the afternoon on February 3, Vanessa Zepeda, a 28-year-old registered nurse, left a union hall after a meeting and began walking to the supermarket to buy school supplies for her children and formula for her baby girl.

She never made it.

According to witnesses, as she was leaving the union hall parking lot in this sprawling capital city, Zepeda was forced into an unmarked white sedan by two masked men dressed in fatigues.

A few hours after she was kidnapped, her corpse, still dressed in blue hospital scrubs, was tossed from a moving car in the Loarque neighborhood on the southern side of the city--a well-known stronghold of the resistance movement.

Zepeda was a member of the National Front of Popular Resistance (FNRP), which like many countries, including Brazil and Argentina, does not recognize the military-backed government of President Porfirio "Pepe" Lobo, who took office in January after much-disputed elections.

Zepeda was also a leader in the Social Security Workers Union. Prior to her abduction, she had attended the meeting at the Bottling Plant union building to talk about the need to join with other unions to peacefully resist the Lobo government.

"Vanessa was very committed to helping others," says Bessi Torrez, Zepeda's mother, in a phone interview with In These Times. (Torrez had agreed to meet in public, but later canceled due to fear of being seen with a foreign journalist.) "She also worked hard to help unite the different syndicates, so that they could consolidate their interests. She sacrificed everything for the Resistance."

After Zepeda's body was found, her mother was notified and told to come straight to the morgue, instead of the crime scene itself. When Torrez arrived, she was not allowed to see any of the forensic evidence or investigation records.

"It was very strange," she says. "The process has been so mysterious."

Since the coup last June, a number of union leaders have died under equally mysterious circumstances. Many Hondurans believe the military-backed government to be responsible for these assassinations. Of the 43 members of the FNRP that have been killed, about half have been trade unionists.

Gilda Batista, director of the Tegucigalpa-based human rights organization Refuge Without Limits (ASL), has investigated the murder of Zepeda and other recently executed union leaders. Batista says her research leads her to believe that assassination squads are being "financed by the corporatocracy and military."

Batista believes the targeting of key individuals like Zepeda "sends a message to the Resistance that union members will be murdered if they meddle in the political arena." In Zepeda's case, forensics experts finally labeled the case a homicide, but still have not disclosed any details about the cause of death. More than three weeks after the autopsy, Torrez is still awaiting an explanation from the government concerning her daughter's murder.

"[The Lobo government] knows that the trade unionists are one of the biggest threats economically. The labor movement has been really central to the resistance," says Dana Frank, professor of history at the University of California, Santa Cruz, in an interview in a Tegucigalpa human rights office. "In Tegucigalpa, many of the biggest Resistance meetings are happening in the Bottling Plant Union building. The unions are a direct economic threat [because] they have a larger vision for Honduras."

There are no government statistics detailing how much of the country's workforce is unionized, but according to the office of the Honduran Labor Secretary, there are currently 527 different syndicates, or workplace-based unions, representing both public and private Honduran workers.

'80s-style death squads?

Although the U.S. State Department does recognize the Lobo government, assassinations of union leaders and other human-rights abuses in Honduras have reached such a pitch that nine members of the House of Representatives sent a letter to Hillary Clinton in early March, asking the secretary of state to investigate the violence.

"I am extremely concerned that U.S. attention to ongoing human-rights abuses in Honduras will wane now that the acute political crisis has ended," Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) wrote in an e-mail to In These Times. "It's tempting for the United States to immediately normalize relations and resume aid now that Honduras has held elections, but I believe that we need to keep the focus on the serious violations that continue to occur."

Rep. Schakowsky, who traveled to Honduras on a fact-finding trip in November 2009 and signed the March letter, says she saw the deterioration of human rights "firsthand." "I am extremely concerned that these abuses are continuing under the new government," she wrote.

Frank, author of Bananera: Women Transforming the Banana Unions of Latin America, is especially concerned about the ongoing assassinations. Five journalists and 13 members of the FNRP were gunned down between March 1 and April 8 alone. Of those 13 FNRP victims, nine were active union members, including one teacher who was shot in front of his students as he lectured, according to the Honduran Teachers Association (COPEMH). Frank believes paramilitary forces reminiscent of the 1980s--when military-funded death squads terrorized the country--are responsible.

"This has been going on for decades in Latin America," Frank says. "Private contractors--they're not officially the military, but they're paid by the military. ... They have their secret lists of people they want to kill in the Honduran Resistance and these people come in the night and beat people up or kill or kidnap them. The Lobo government is supporting this kind of activity. They're not denouncing it.
They're not investigating these assassinations."

Frank also pointed out that certain figures associated with internal human-rights violations have recently been given prominent positions of power in the new government. Infamous 1980s death-squad leader Billy Joya is now a special advisor to the Lobo regime. And Romeo Vasquez, the U.S.-trained general who orchestrated the putsch itself, was named to be head of the Honduran national phone company last month.

Honduran Secretary of Labor Felicito Avila Ordonez laughingly dismisses the idea that death squads are operating again. "It's true, we do have a security problem in the streets, in the markets," says
Ordonez during an interview in his office. "We can't have peace without employment."

Honduras' unemployment rate was at about 51 percent just before last year's coup. Ordonez declined to provide a more recent figure, saying only, "It's quite bad." (According to the Tegucigalpa-based Chamber of Commerce and Industry, more than 100,000 jobs have been lost since the coup.) Replying to a question about what can be done to curb unemployment, the Lobo-appointed labor secretary says, "Confidence! Faith! We know the government must be more transparent. This will be a more Christian government!"

Ordonoz, a former trade union leader, says he feels loyal to both workers and employers, and that the Lobo government's official attitude toward the unions is one of peace and reconciliation. "But we can't have anarchy," he says. "Laborers must respect how the law works." When pressed to provide an explanation for the recent killing of union leaders, Ordonez replies: "Maybe it's the Resistance thinking how they can make trouble for the country," he laughs. "Probably it's just common crime."
Frank strongly disagrees.

"[These killings] were made to look like common crimes, but these [victims] are all people involved in the Resistance. The military is being very clever," she says. "They're not knocking off the top leaders. They know that if that happened, they would have a tremendous international reaction. So instead they're going after people in the middle. It's a form of state terror."

Maquila oligarchy

Like other countries in Latin America, Honduras has long been dominated by the economic interest of the north. For decades, banana corporations familiar to Americans--like Dole and United Fruit (now Chiquita)--controlled the economy and the government. "Honduras is the original banana republic," Frank says. But because of the lucrative and labor-intensive trade of which they were
part, workers on Honduran plantations have historically been able to demand good contracts, including wage increases, healthcare and even anti-domestic violence workshops.

However, as the country's economy has diversified in recent decades, other trade unions within Honduras have been unable to equal the success of the banana workers. This is because of the uniquely massive nature of the banana industry, which employs organized workers suffering under similar circumstances throughout Latin America--workers who could wield tremendous cumulative power if they strike together.

But even the once-powerful banana unions are under threat. Dole and Chiquita have developed a common strategy of selling off fincas (or plantations) to smaller independent subcontractors, who refuse to honor previous labor contracts."

[The banana unions] still have vestigial power because they are so well-coordinated across the banana sector in Latin America, and with strong solidarity ties in Europe and the U.S. But [that power is] always being chipped away," Frank writes.

Other cash-crop workers in Honduras are on less equal footing.

Farmers in the highly lucrative African palm industry "are obviously exploited," Jose Serrano, coordinator of the Committee of Popular Organizations of Aguan (COPA), tells In These Times. The Aguan basin, on the Caribbean coast of Honduras, has been the scene of an intense, five-month stand-off between palm oil workers, and the military dictatorship. Poor farmers were originally granted collective land rights by the Agrarian Reform Law, enacted in 1962. But since then, both Honduran and transnational companies have illegally re-purchased the valuable farms resulting, says Serrano, in the farmers once again becoming powerless, low-wage serfs.

In response, the palm workers (the oil is used in cooking products worldwide) have peacefully but "permanently" occupied several plantations in the district. According to COPA, these pacifist actions have resulted in the death of seven farmers so far, as private security forces have repeatedly opened fire on the campesinos, in attempts to drive them from their land.

"On the palm-oil fincas, the workers receive just 95 lempira (about $5) a day," Serrano says. The farmers who have occupied the plantations in the Aguan Basin finally rose up, he says, because they were "existing without sufficient food or clean drinking water. A typical work week is six or seven days long."

In other GDP-leading industries like lumber and tourism, and within the factory system, unions have been successfully discouraged. Workers in maquilas--transnationally owned factories that operate in tax-free zones to manufacture things like textiles, garments and athletic shoes for export--are essentially powerless, according to Honduran workers' rights activists, despite their great numbers.

"As for maquiladoras, the sad fact is that almost no one, anywhere in [Latin America] has been able to establish unions that last," Frank says. "There are a handful of organized factories in Honduras, but usually everyone just gets fired and blacklisted as soon as they sign the petition asking for an election."

A representative for Honduran maquila workers agrees.

"If the girls try to organize at all, the leaders are fired right away," says Maria Luisa Regalado, coordinator general for Honduran Women's Collective (CODEMUH), an NGO that specializes
in the maquila sector. The average maquila worker in Honduras earns 121 lempira (about $6.40)
per day, Regalado says during an interview in the industrial city of San Pedro Sula. From this wage, women--and most maquila workers are female--must pay for transportation, housing, food and day care.

"The owners don't want unions in the factories, because there are so many workers, and such a
union would be too powerful for them," she says. According to CODEMUH, maquila workers in Honduras number more than 130,000 people. "And yet these companies don't pay any taxes, they give nothing back to the communities. They steal our labor and pay nothing for it. It is unjust and inhuman," Regalado says, referring to companies like Hanes, Active Wear and Loveables.

A spokesperson for a public-relations company that represents maquila owners insists that nothing
is amiss. "The maquilas bring a lot of good to those communities," says Tesla Callejas de Flores, communication and marketing coordinator for the Honduran Manufacturers Association, based in San Pedro Sula. "When these women have jobs, they have equilibrium in their lives. For instance, they may not need to feel dependent, or stuck in an abusive relationship with a man. That's why so many people want to work here." Maquila owners have a "deep respect for workers rights" and all workers receive "full medical benefits" after a job-sustained injury, she says.

Regalado, however, tells a different story. "There is very little compensation for injuries, despite
what they say," she says, citing the case of Reina Quintania, a 22-year-old woman who lost one
eye and suffered damage to the other as the result of an on-the-job accident in a Hanes factory.
"They removed [the object] from her punctured eye, treated her with simple first aid in the infirmary, and then sent her back to work," Regalado says. "Afterwards, they only paid for 35 percent of Reina's medical bills. Now the girl is practically blind, and she can't work, and she's in debt for the operation she had to undergo. And of course [Hanes] doesn't offer any kind of disability for injured workers. Since they aren't allowed to unionize, the workers are helpless."

The Honduran Manufacturers Association denied any knowledge of the Quintania case.

Teaching resistance

"We have a very unified movement, a very representative movement," says FNRP leader Rafael Alegria, who is also president of the powerful Honduran farmworkers union Via Campesina. "We demand an end to the violence and repression. We support the laborers, who continue to receive death threats. We support the unemployed, who have a right to work." Alegria spoke after a Feb. 25, 2010, march in Tegucigalpa on the National Congress building by approximately 60,000 members of the FNRP, which has modeled itself on nonviolent social movements.

The FNRP also continues to push for a better public education system, a goal held by ousted President Manuel Zelaya. The country's education and literacy levels are seriously compromised by endemic poverty, and the student-teacher ratio is on average 40-to-one. The day after soldiers kidnapped and exiled Zelaya in June 2009, tens of thousands of teachers went on strike.

"Zelaya had actualized free education for all Hondurans, as is stipulated in the constitution," says Jamie Rodriguez, president of COPEMH, one of the country's largest teachers unions. Although last year's strike has now ended, Rodriguez says the teachers are still playing a vital role in the FNRP. In late April, they began conducting a nationwide poll to determine if there is democratic support for the creation of a constitutional assembly. (Zelaya was swept from office for his willingness to allow a similar referendum.) The goal is to collect signatures from at least half of the Honduran electorate.

"This is our chance to re-found our country," Rodriguez says, adding that the new constitution would do away with "laws designed only to serve the rich".

Zelaya had set up government programs to pay for lunches, travel to schools and tuition. Zelaya's reforms allowed about 450,000 children to begin attending school, "but all of that was canceled after the coup," Rodriguez says.

He had done more than just help students. The economy made significant strides while he was in office, according to a study published by the Washington-based Center for Economic and Policy Research. The country's GDP increased an average of seven percent annually during Zelaya's first two years in office, and the percentage of Hondurans living in poverty dropped from about 66 to 61.But many experts say it was precisely this slight leveling of the economic playing field that angered the dozen or so wealthy families that have traditionally ruled Honduras and led to the military coup against the president.

Putschists in power

In the months following the coup, 155,000 jobs were lost and the poverty rate began to grow again as wary governments cut foreign aid. Tourism, the third-largest industry in Honduras, fell by 70 percent.

The cost of mobilizing police and armed forces--estimated at about $50 million U.S. dollars per day during the weeks Honduras was under martial law after the coup--as well as the general economic slow-down, resulted in the second-poorest nation in Central America declaring bankruptcy in February.

Due to public concern about human-rights abuses and top-level corruption in the central government, just 49 percent of the Honduran electorate turned out for the ballot vote that brought Lobo to power last November. Many observers have claimed that elections under the military-imposed government were neither free nor fair.

The Lobo government has tried to fight the public's perception of corruption. "Suddenly on the television here in Honduras, we're hearing all about campaigns against corruption," says Frank, referring to a series of advertisements produced by Lobo, who backed the putsch against Zelaya. "Well, who are the corrupt people? Who are the people who have been robbing the coffers of this country for decades? Who are the people that take humanitarian aid and line their pockets with it?"

"Now the new, illegitimate Lobo government says it wants reconciliation," says teachers union leader Rodriguez. "They talk about wanting peace, but they are still killing people in the streets." Some teachers particularly vocal in their opposition to the government have stopped receiving pay checks, Rodriguez says, and police recently gassed a "dissident" school while teachers and students were still inside. In all, according to COPEMH's Rodriguez, five teachers have died in politically motivated assassinations since the coup, and one has disappeared.

Alegria says the Lobo government appears to be little more than an extension of the regime of Roberto Micheletti, who became de facto president after the coup. "The power structure is still intact. The same Congress that backed the coup. The same military junta--all the same putschists in power," Alegria says.

Rep. Schakowsky is worried about these trends, as well as the cozy relationship the Lobo government has so far enjoyed with the U.S. State Department. "I hope the secretary [Clinton]
will look into the reports of human rights abuses," she wrote to In These Times. "Human rights considerations must be part of any process of aid resumption and diplomatic normalization."

Conclusion

But for those who have lost loved ones at the hands of the military regime, normalization will
be a long and painful process. "I want justice," says Torrez, mother of slain union leader Zepeda. "Not just for Vanessa, but for all those who have lost their lives for the Resistance."

This article is an updated version of the May 2010 cover story.

Jeremy Kryt is a graduate of the Indiana University School of Journalism and the University of Iowa Writers' Workshop. He has been reporting from Honduras since August 2009, and his coverage of the crisis there has appeared in The Earth Island Journal, Alternet and The Narco News Bulletin, among other publications.

And the point there Adumbical is that anyone from Honduras that comes here and then votes for a party that wants big government and more government control over their lives is a dumb twit. You would think they would have learned from that kind of experience and what that amount of government control does. You would think they would want to stay as far away from that as possible and never even think of voting for anyone that wants government to control of anything. I can see that person voting libertarian (that is nothing like a liberial) and if not libertarian then the next best thing conservative. The point is you would stay as far away from progressives as possible.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiriuslyLong

Well that, and the government is extremely corrupt and in the case of Chavez, the guy is essentially a dictator. But you do make a fantastic point.

Are socialism and corruption connected?

---

I will just say that, the Founders thought so and that is why they would be turning over in their graves if they knew what was going on and the size and control this government has gotten to. Ok Ok I can see some point to some of the smoking bans (any that may effect others), besides most of those are state laws and if you dont like it you can vote with your feet. BUT salt NOW, really. That is just getting scary. Then again look at the control over trans fats. Ether of those two has alternatives noone is forcing anyone to goto a place that serves ether.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiriuslyLong

Well that, and the government is extremely corrupt and in the case of Chavez, the guy is essentially a dictator. But you do make a fantastic point.

Are socialism and corruption connected?

---

Everything is corrupt if money is involved. That especially applies to capitalism. I can't believe you asked that.

Incidentally, "fantastic point"? BS. See the article above I posted.


How Wall Street Creates Socialists
Thursday 29 April 2010
by: E.J. Dionne Jr., Op-Ed

Washington - Maybe the next time someone calls Barack Obama a socialist, the president shouldn't issue a denial. He might instead urge his accuser to read the hearing transcript of this week's congressional testimony from the Goldman Sachs guys in their beautiful suits.

Capitalism has not taken a hit like this since Mr. Potter made his appearance as the evil banker on "It's a Wonderful Life." No leftist polemicist could come up with as damning a description of contemporary capitalism as the contents of an e-mail that Goldman's Fabrice "Fabulous Fab" Tourre sent to his girlfriend.

"Well," he wrote, "what if we created a 'thing', which has no purpose, which is absolutely conceptual and highly theoretical and which nobody knows how to price?"

Perhaps Fab once read the Karl Marx who wrote: "The more abstract money is, the less natural its relationship to other commodities."

If money is an abstraction, the investment industry's creative inventions are abstractions of abstractions of abstractions. Banks no longer just give people loans to buy houses. Now Wall Street's geniuses -- and they are ingenious -- trade bizarre financial products in which the original loan is packaged with thousands of others and buried under piles of equations and economic gibberish.

Goldman may face SEC charges, but it's the entirety of our deregulated financial system that's on trial. In this new order, the inventiveness of our entrepreneurs goes not only into creating products that actually enhance our lives (from refrigerators to laptops to iPods) but also into fashioning "absolutely conceptual and highly theoretical" financial products whose main function is to enrich a very small number of well-placed people.

The ever-more-complex financial instruments are defended on the grounds that they make life better for everybody. Tourre offered this justification in another of his revealing e-mails: "Anyway, not feeling too guilty about this, the real purpose of my job is to make capital markets more efficient and ultimately provide the U.S. consumer with more efficient ways to leverage and finance himself, so there is a humble, noble and ethical reason for my job ;)"

Then he added: "amazing how good I am in convincing myself !!!"

Tourre's unconventionally punctuated observations go to the heart of the debate we need to have: How many of the arguments offered on behalf of these exotic transactions are nothing more than rationalizations for the capacity they give a few investment bankers to get very, very rich?
Does it make sense to have investment houses playing the role of "market makers" peddling financial junk with one hand that they then bet against with the other? Let's assume for the sake of argument that this is perfectly legal. The real question is: Why should it be?

I'm prepared to believe that some of these financial innovations do real work for the real economy. Yes, it's good that farmers can use the futures markets to lock in prices, and the secondary mortgage markets may well free up capital. But Wall Street has gone way beyond the original purposes of such devices and created a world unto itself in which the gains are reserved for privileged insiders and the losses are borne by everybody else.

At one point during the hearings, Sen. Carl Levin played the Jimmy Stewart good-banker role from "It's a Wonderful Life" by describing capitalism as it's supposed to be. Levin noted that Wall Street "has been seen as an engine of growth, betting on America's successes and not its failures."

Well, that's what Wall Street proclaims in its advertisements for itself. But when defending themselves against legal charges, Wall Streeters retreat to honesty by saying that everybody knows they are really there to make money and that it's naive to hold them accountable for the social impact of what they do.

It is, indeed, naive to expect Wall Street to act as charitably as the Salvation Army, and you have to respect Fabulous Fab's brutal candor about this. Which brings us back to socialism.

Marx's predictions about the inevitable collapse of capitalism have been wrong so far because the system has worked reasonably well thanks to the rules and redistributive programs established after the Great Crash.

The lesson is that the surest way to save capitalism is to regulate it in the public interest. The surest way to create socialists is for everyone to experience the economic consequences of counting only on the goodness in the hearts of Mr. Potter and Fabrice Tourre.

SiriuslyLong, here once again Adumbical does what all progessives do, they leave out anything that does not fit their agenda. They have made a mockery of our history that way. To say any of the founders were not religious is outright wrong. But you see they needed to do that to try and say that is the reason they have taken the seperation of church and state to the level none of the founders would have ever wanted to see. History proves what they had meant by that is that. They were after all, the ones that wanted the ten commandments in the court houses. At least one founded a STATE RUN church when they were governors. Others started a company to printed bibles that were given to all congressmen when they first took office.

Ok back to the original point, Adumbical forgets to tell you it is the huge amount of government regulation that makes companies and government bed fellows in the first place. look it is both sides that takes money from them but as for who took the most, GS gave to democrats 4 times what they gave to republicans, Obama himself was responsible for getting 20% of all the contributions given by GS. Companies would not need to lobby the government if there were not so many government regulations on them. Need proof just look at Europe and South America, hell any socialist leaning country, and what happens. What you end up getting it is ether socialism, facism, or communism, Look at what has happen to our great country as we get sweeped into the progressive system.

Yes I know adumbical would like to blame all the ills of the world on capitalism, yet he forgets to mention that it has been becuase of capitalism (and the United States in general) have come as far as we have so fast. He forgets or cant admit that there is a undesputed fact and that is the United States has been the most generious nation on the planet. Because he thinks the way he does, he cant answer, why it is that at least 70% of innovation had come from the US, Why is it that most of the dicoverys on drugs and medical tech has come from the US. So why is it that we are such a small percentage of the worlds population yet we are responsible for such a high percentage of the worlds discoveries. These are all questions that Adumbical has trouble with and that reason is evident.

The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Atypical

The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein.

---

Was that supposed to be a link? Atypical, I don't read those marathon posts - too much. I just want to share that with you.

Read State of Fear by, by, by damn, the guy passed last year, great author, read several of his books -- Michael Creigton, if I got it right.

Remember one thing, greed it good.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Atypical

The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein.

---

I read the "blurp". I don't know what to make of it as it's almost farcical yet fear mongering. Yes, after a "shock" things will change, and it's absurd to think that "greedy capitalist" are in the wait to bounce on an opportunity to make money due to a shock. And even if that is true, they do so by offer a good or service as a solution. I question if the good or service is worth it, but I'm quite certain that the CEO of these "greedy capitalists" isn't thinking, "oh this is good, we're going to screw those poor bastards and they won't even know it." You have no faith in anything. I'm starting to think you like to complain.

Those are all easy assertions to make; but foolishly dismissive, simplistic, and because you haven't read the book, ignorant of the facts. If you made a sincere effort to read how the world really works you would find that your preconceived notions melt away (assuming you read with an open mind). It is a far more complicated and devious arena than most know. Yes, if you have no reference for a comment someone makes, it can sound strange. It is only when you understand the reference yourself, or if you are curious, that you can judge the details with some accuracy. If you can’t then ridicule usually follows. Like yours.

Perhaps, like most, you probably prefer to only read, listen, and care about those things you already consider true or important. Then you should never challenge yourself and never read anything that contradicts what you already believe*. You're done. Done with intellectual growth, done with curiosity and done with the stimulation of new information. And, in my estimation, your ability to think has been wasted if it ever existed.

I don't need that "comfort" because I have learned enough to know that the things we don't know are far more numerous than what we think we know. And it can be fascinating to see that for one’s self.

My purpose when I found this site after buying SIRI stock was to learn from those that probably knew more about the company and its financials than I did. That proved to be a good idea because there are many here and elsewhere that have taught me a lot about what I didn't know. It was eye-opening and I have benefited. Since I read almost everything that I come across (here and everywhere else) to see if I am interested further, I always review any negative comments as well. That taught me what to ignore and what to value. I still learn regularly from this site.

Using your system, I could have assumed that I knew a lot and had no need of anything further because I probably knew enough. Nope - not what I ever do. I like getting new information including that which may show I am wrong. That's how I grow. And most importantly, I know what I don't know, and am not afraid to admit it. Ever.

My goal in posting in the political forum was to provide essays that explain an interesting take on a subject, comments that may not be widely exposed. But since most have their own busy lives to lead and taking into consideration the above limits to human development I noted, (and being this is a financial site), I didn't expect to get applause for much, especially criticism of uncontrolled capitalism. I was right.

So, you (and others) have proven my point. People just want to be left with their "facts" intact and can get pissed when someone challenges them. And they rarely have any objective reason for their disagreement. Just personal attacks and lot’s of bullshit that sounds great to them.

I have been involved along the way with some activities that sought to provide information to the public that belief in any pseudoscience is inappropriate without objective scientific evidence. From that experience I became aware that any proof, however conclusive, will rarely sway a person’s imbedded support of the most ridiculous beliefs. Humans don’t really want to change their faith in something. It’s too uncomfortable mentally and apparently is also connected to self-worth.

Your comment in a recent post; *“Atypical, I don't read those marathon posts - too much. I just want to share that with you.”

Makes the point, doesn’t it.

So, I will be happy to leave you and anyone else with your comforting beliefs. Obviously I could never provide you with anything meaningful that is better than your current ideologies.

Security blanket comes to mind.

PS. Michael Crichton was a prolific writer of many bestselling fiction books e.g., Andromeda Strain. He was an MD as well, I think, and lately a global warming denier. His presentations were debunked. An MD has no credibility in the field of climate science. As I and others have written in one of my “marathon posts”, the science is conclusive. But the timing and some of the details are in flux. So I would read his book if I didn’t know all of that. But I probably have read his thoughts given by others. There are lots of deniers and I read their stuff.

See, it’s not so hard.

P.P.S Hope this wasn't too long.

Yes and wasn't it some in the Obama administartion that actually said, "we cant let a good crisis go to waste."


P.S. The point to SiriuslyLong comment about your cut and paste job is that; get the relevent points you want to make out of the article and then link to the article and let the people decide if they want to goto it or not and read it or not.


Here is an example just incase you are that big of a twit and just dont get it. While I may like to read "War and Piece" or I think there are some good points to make in it, that does not mean I would cut and paste the whole book in a post. Do you get it now you jackass.

I have to agree with SL also, that the marathon posts are just too long to keep my attention.

Many of us have jobs that keep us busy all day and only allow us a few moments every now and then to check out this or any site.

I suppose that someday, I may be retired and have the time. But, right now, I think the more time I spend keeping my family happy, volunteering in my community, and running my business so that others have jobs, is time well spent. Time spent reading endless articles that basically attack my American way of life is not time well spent for our society.

Facts are good. Short facts are the best. Opinions....well, we all have them!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by john

Yes and wasn't it some in the Obama administartion that actually said, "we cant let a good crisis go to waste."


P.S. The point to SiriuslyLong comment about your cut and paste job is that; get the relevent points you want to make out of the article and then link to the article and let the people decide if they want to goto it or not and read it or not.


Here is an example just incase you are that big of a twit and just dont get it. While I may like to read "War and Piece" or I think there are some good points to make in it, that does not mean I would cut and paste the whole book in a post. Do you get it now you jackass.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by candleman

I have to agree with SL also, that the marathon posts are just too long to keep my attention.

Many of us have jobs that keep us busy all day and only allow us a few moments every now and then to check out this or any site.

I suppose that someday, I may be retired and have the time. But, right now, I think the more time I spend keeping my family happy, volunteering in my community, and running my business so that others have jobs, is time well spent. Time spent reading endless articles that basically attack my American way of life is not time well spent for our society.

Facts are good. Short facts are the best. Opinions....well, we all have them!

---

Thanks Candleman (and John). Atypical, I have a job, wife and two kids to take care of. It's really that simple. I took the time to read the blurb, and it seemed conspriratorial and cynical. It's just an observation, but if it looks like a bread box...........

John, the guy who started this thread has to be either mentally unstable or he is truly unAmerican.

Just read the trash that he has put up here. He implies that people from South America are stupid or lazy.

This brings to mind Adolf Hitler. That was close to the way that he spoke of European Jews. Hitler felt about the Jews, the same way as John feels about Immagrants to America.

Hitler felt that Jews came to Germany and Europe to take advantage of the locals. That's what John says about South American immagrants. He says they came here to take advantage of us.

I think John is some sort of a white supremicist that doesn't want to share Our Country with folks of a different color or religion. John refers to them as dumbasses and twits.

Think about it. John is a far right radical. He blames everything that is wrong in America on immagration or the Democrat Party. Hitler felt that everything that was wrong with Europe was the fault of Jewish people and folks that weren't white Christians.

I think John is a disgrace to America. I think John is very Hitleresque in his thinking.

Be very careful of this person. He has two identities on SiriusBuzz. Both start with John. He will try and influence you in the same way that Adolf Hitler tried to influence the folks of Germany.

Hitler lost and so will John. But, just be very careful of this nutcase. I've reported this and other of his posts to the Department of Homeland Security. It's an important job for all good Freedom Loving Americans to keep an eye on people with this kind of ideology. We have to protect our country from people like this. If we don't the next thing you know, you'll be reading about this John character in the news. Perhaps he will be the next militia member that wants to destroy our country or casue havic. Just be very careful of this fool.

Certainly any guy who shouts Socialism, Communism, dumbass, twit at everything he disagrees with is a definite menace to our democratic values and ideals.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by candleman

John, the guy who started this thread has to be either mentally unstable or he is truly unAmerican.

Just read the trash that he has put up here. He implies that people from South America are stupid or lazy.

This brings to mind Adolf Hitler. That was close to the way that he spoke of European Jews. Hitler felt about the Jews, the same way as John feels about Immagrants to America.

Hitler felt that Jews came to Germany and Europe to take advantage of the locals. That's what John says about South American immagrants. He says they came here to take advantage of us.

I think John is some sort of a white supremicist that doesn't want to share Our Country with folks of a different color or religion. John refers to them as dumbasses and twits.

Think about it. John is a far right radical. He blames everything that is wrong in America on immagration or the Democrat Party. Hitler felt that everything that was wrong with Europe was the fault of Jewish people and folks that weren't white Christians.

I think John is a disgrace to America. I think John is very Hitleresque in his thinking.

Be very careful of this person. He has two identities on SiriusBuzz. Both start with John. He will try and influence you in the same way that Adolf Hitler tried to influence the folks of Germany.

Hitler lost and so will John. But, just be very careful of this nutcase. I've reported this and other of his posts to the Department of Homeland Security. It's an important job for all good Freedom Loving Americans to keep an eye on people with this kind of ideology. We have to protect our country from people like this. If we don't the next thing you know, you'll be reading about this John character in the news. Perhaps he will be the next militia member that wants to destroy our country or casue havic. Just be very careful of this fool.

---

Ha yes, I knew we would see Soul lewinskis "rules for radiclas" come out at sometime. Yes this is use by every lib out and yet Candleman says he is not a liberial. Hummm amazing though that he believes in all there beliefs and thinks exactly like they do. I am sure he also thinks all the Tea Party people are Nazies to.


Hummm, there is just several things the dumbass doesn't seem to grasp about Hitler and the Nazis. First Hitler believed in his Party, you know the one called the National SOCAILIST party, Hey dumbass did you see the SOCAILIST part of that name. Second Hitler hated all jews reguardless, I said 70% of immagrants are stupid because we know 70% vote democrat. What else would you call someone that runs from his own country because the polocies made it a hell hole to be in and then when they get here they vote for the very same type of people that turn their own country into a hell hole. That leaves only two options they are ether stupid or lazy, Take your pick, but its got to be one or the other.

Ever talk to an immagrant from any part of the old USSR or China????

There is a reason most of them come here and vote republican.

There is a reason they say dont you people see what you have and you are ruining it.

There is yet another problem with this twits satement, I love how he says "FREEDOM loving Americans", yet he is in favor of the government controling every aspect of your life.

Need proof just look at what he has said, He has no problem with them telling you your thermostate is set to high or to low, he has no problem with them telling you what type of car to buy.


You know that complaint may actually go somewhere with this administration in control we know how much this administration hates discent. We know what the Obama appointed Homeland Security Secretary says about the main threat to our country is, "report issued by her department said troops returning from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were at risk for being recruited by right-wing extremists.". So yes with this administration that kind of report may go places.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...ing-extremism/

Ho yes she had to apologized for letting what this administration really thinks, slip out.


Hummm Tisk tisk dumbass, Who was it that promoted people telling on others that were against the views of their government, Ho yea, thats right, it was the Nazis and commumist. You must have missed that history lesson dumbass.

Here is another history lesson for dumbass liberial/progressives like yourself. Liberials loved the Nazis until Germany invaded Russia.

Also where do you think the Nazis got the idea of gas chambers. Yes from you progressives. You need to watch Beck as he plays the video of the love they had for Hitler and what he was doing in Germany and how we should follow their example. goto 4 min. 10 seconds (it shows the article of the New York Times and liberial columist prasing Hitler.).

http://caosblog.com/archives/16950

(goto the second part of the series 4 min. 5 sec.) inwhich The video is played which shows another one of the liberial and socailist heros, George Benard Shaw, Talking about what they should do to people they find not worth their weight!!!! What, did he really say we should just get rid of them (of course humanly) buy putting them in GAS CHAMBERS. Yes thats right, that was way before Hitler.


Nice you dont find this kind of ironey. Who is your hero in the liberial circles????? Yes that is right Marx and what did Marx say about the Spanish??? That they were degenerates and that Mexicans are worse because they are degenerates off a degenerated race. Yes isn't that a nice way to think about people. You should be assamed of yourself candelman.



And looky here who does Obama have as one of his advisors none other then Cas Sunsten, Hummm, didn't he write a book about forced sterilazion and how the government could put it into the drinking water.


Once again you dont have to believe Beck, HES GOT THE VIDEO, and qoutes of the people saying it themselves.


Yes I know you dumbass libs hate facts and qoutes and video of things that prove you to be the dumbassed twits you are but that is why I call you dumbass twits because only after watching the videos can you still belive in what you twits do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Havakasha

Certainly any guy who shouts Socialism, Communism, dumbass, twit at everything he disagrees with is a definite menace to our democratic values and ideals.

---

Not only a menace to our Democratic Values, but a true menace to our society overall. Hate speech is how it all begins. The terrorists that continually try to attack us from within our own borders have one thing in common. They ALL use internet forums like this to spread thier hatred for our values. Just like this John guy does.