Charles the flip flopper

................................................

I think you need to re-read the posts. The first line states, "In this weekly guest post, Scott Spiegel shares his feelings about Sirius XM CEO Mel Karmazin."

Charles is not the author, it is a guest author who is offering his own opinion. To attribute those opinions to Charles is wrong.

Mels salary has been spken of many times here. He makes about 1.25 million, and gets a bonus in the $3 million to $4 million range. A lot of money... yes, but not anything beyond the scope of what one might expect. There have been long and drawn out discussions about this. For the record, those that want to say Mel made $30 million are being foolish and showing how little they know. I'll leave it at that.

at the very least tho
it appears to have been fair-minded (of charles)
to publish an opinion contrary to his own
whether that was his intention or not;
it is good to see the pros and cons of all sides,
and sirius buzz is definitely good at getting those
viewpoints out in the open

How did you miss the opening italicized line?

In this weekly guest post, Scott Spiegel shares his feelings about Sirius XM CEO Mel Karmazin.

I await your apology.

Charles was just aiding capitulation along so he could buy more.... ;)

My positions in the company have not changed. I think it is important that people know that.

I am not "promoting" anything. Also, I think overlooking the fact that I didn't write that article is ludicrous. My position on this company and Mel have not changed.

Don't create a post called Charles is a flip flopper, realize that it wasn't me that wrote the post, and then say you aren't going to apologize.... that's not cool.

You can say that you love us and thank us for the site all you want but you're not welcome. I wish you would never come here again... I quit you as a fan.

Wow, charles, didnt think you'd cry over a post..
Seems you can't take a little criticism.
If you can't take it, don't post it.
OK, im deleting my account to your forum.

I'm not crying and I can take plenty of it. BUT you criticized me for something I didn't do Captain McJumptoconclusions. So don't cry if you cant take a little JUSTIFIED heat back. I didn't start this post... you did.

I am not deleting your account and neither are you.

You're the poster, you put your name on it, so you get the criticism. So get over it. And I know you need the last word, so go ahead.
As I stated before your a flip flopper, in one breath you told me you never wanted me to post here again, and in the next breath you said you nor I will get to delete my account... make up your mind man.
I feel like im at the RNC in 2004, waving my hands, saying "flip flop, flip flop"

My name was not on it, I make a point of Giving Scotty full credit. I could have logged in with anyones name and posted that article but, I used mine because it was easy. I am not here (and neither are Tyler or Brandon) to give one sided views of things. Just because I don't agree doesn't mean that I don't appreciate the other side of the coin. Sometimes the other side of the coin strengthens yours thoughts on an issue or sharpens your argument. In short, its helpful.

Saying that I quit you as a fan is tongue and cheek. I am sorry you don't understand the joke that I made... see its ironic when someone "quits" their fans because you cant really choose who follows you or stop them from doing so.

I never said that I "never wanted you to post here again," I said that I quit you as a fan and that I WISH you would never come here again. When I said "you're not welcome" I was responding to you saying "thanks."

I can ban you if you want, I guess but, you cant delete a forum account because it ruins the context of what has been written in the past. Which is why you cant find a little link to terminate your account, its just not part of the software... and for good reason.

What a baby... your start a post calling me out on my own site and cant take my point of view without acting like a child and deleting posts and crying. All you had to say was "oops, I didn't notice that you were responsible for the content of that post." but, instead you decided to defend what was clearly a misunderstanding.

Am I responsible for Tylers content? Because we disagree quite a bit... should we stop posting anything that we do not agree 100% about? If that were the case, nothing would make it into the news paper.

This is goofy that I even waste time arguing a point that is so clear cut.

My bad....
It makes no sense to call out the main source of content.
Whether I agree with the article or not, your just posting for us to read, in which many members here and myself appreciate.
I was wrong in my post, and you made your case and point.
Now imma get back to my beer and college basketball.
Enjoy your weekend.