SIRI Intraday thread: Monday June 1st

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by john

Thats funny because first of all it was about 9 years ago all the analyst were getting on Toyota and alike about not getting into the SUV market and seeing that market long before now (about 9 years ago). Second So are you saying the oil companies should have gone after the more difficult oil that cost more to get it out first. Thats the same load of crap the democrats are tying to pull by saying there are millions of acres that are approved for drilling but the oil companies are not doing it. They forget to mention the fields that are being developed are being held up by lawsuits filed by greenys and the rest of the areas there studies show there is not any or enough oil in to make it worth developing. Now you may make since if there were not plenty of other areas where there is plenty of oil to make it economical to develope that the government is stopping them from drilling in. Your problem with your argument is you want the oil companies to do what you are compaining about the auto companies doing. That makes about as much since as being for abortion and against the death penalty.

---

Abortion politics on i day someone killed a doctor? Please.

Those were the same car analysts who were wrong about everything else.
Dont you know about any of the accurate car analysts? lol.

As i said to everyone else i am out the door and going to work. Mean it this
time. Ciao.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by john

Thats funny because first of all it was about 9 years ago all the analyst were getting on Toyota and alike about not getting into the SUV market and seeing that market long before now (about 9 years ago). Second So are you saying the oil companies should have gone after the more difficult oil that cost more to get it out first. Thats the same load of crap the democrats are tying to pull by saying there are millions of acres that are approved for drilling but the oil companies are not doing it. They forget to mention the fields that are being developed are being held up by lawsuits filed by greenys and the rest of the areas there studies show there is not any or enough oil in to make it worth developing. Now you may make since if there were not plenty of other areas where there is plenty of oil to make it economical to develope that the government is stopping them from drilling in. Your problem with your argument is you want the oil companies to do what you are compaining about the auto companies doing. That makes about as much since as being for abortion and against the death penalty.

---

John you are spot on,what people fail to realize is that the USA has the most open land of any industrialized country on the planet and we have 2 diverse evconomies,rural and urban...So cities like NY and LA and CHI can use the small car, hybrid ,mass transit type model that would work like most European and asian nations,but the rest of the country is spread out with mountains and long drives to stores and such..Can you imagine an OPAL or FIAT climbing the mountains of Montana or deserts of Nevada....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tabor

i know this is off topic a bit, but can anyone explain the behavior of GM stock today?

could have made a killing so far today if i was brave enough.

man, it is frustrating watching a stock go from .50 to 1.00 in an hour and not be in on it!!

---

That is a sucker play,as shorts and day traders are driving the price falsely to get out,this is the last day on the regular market,tommorrow it goes to the pink sheets...they are worthless..

here come the usual suspects with bad un factual news...

http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/story/...ed&cm_ite=Feed

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SteveSirius

We're on about page 6 of the SIRI intraday thread for June 1, and this is the first mention of SIRI. Perhaps we can get off this GM thing of blaming unions/government/oil/etc. and talk here about what this (and other things) means for SIRI?

---

I am really getting tired of some individuals!

top of page,go to User CP,click and you;ll see edit ignore list..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lloyd Handwerker

China is making MAJOR investments in electric car battery technology, high
speed trains, solar, wind etc. We better get going because they are going
to pass us quickly.

---

As long as oil is cheaper than 'new non-fossil fuel' technology, it is king. And, China? The biggest polluter and human rights violator on earth. But, now they're the darling of the green movement? And Europe...they suck too. Greenies always point to the Europeans as the model (lovers, not fighters, natl health care, workers councils, little cars, etc,.....except for nuke power, which Europe, especially the French, have embraced. And, they spend very little on defense because they all depend on the hated US to save their sorry asses.....again.
If we would unfetter our nuke power industry, we would have all the cheap electric power needed for those hybrid/electric cars. But, if market floods with electric cars, the demand for elec power would be huge, and where would it come from? Without nukes, it would come from fossil fuels....net gain to environment 0, or maybe even minus. Hydrogen fuel cell....that would be awesome....someday. But not in a long while. So, what do we do NOW? And, mandating better gas mileage....BS.....just encourages people drive MORE and use the same or even more fuel! There's a crossover point I suppose, when mileage improvement would actually cause the total use of less fuel, but it's not at 35 mpg. That won't do a damn thing to curtail fuel consumption. Probably around 100 mpg or something extremely high. Total hocus pocus from the left.

love to see all these analysts putting a dent into our momentum, they always time it perfectly.

SIRI predictions for end of week close?

Because I know nothing about charting and SIR is unpredictable I say .67 maybe .72.

how long once the new satellite is in space will it take to be operational?