Sirius thread weeks june 28-july 12 2010

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Boomer

Spencer, I am shocked that you would feel necessary to respond to any these accusations. Your professionalism and in depth due diligence is second to none when it comes to Sirius XM. Just ignore these kinds of comments...they do not deserve your time and attention. In fact, when you respond, you are, in fact, falling into their trap. They want to create controversy that draws attention and curiosity to their site. You are better then that and need to stand apart from that kind of nonsense. Anyway, jmpo :) :confused:

---

There are new people on these sites all of the time. While most know the history....or at least part of it. I just had to clear that up for those that are not already aware.

Hey Spencer,
I'm just a simple minded business guy who is heavily invested in the market. SIRI is by far my largest holding. I have not been to the other Sirius sites very often because Sirius Buzz provides me with all of the information that I need to make intelligent decisions about my holdings.

Your articles and input are a true benefit to me as an investor. You speak clearly are very honest in your writing. Keep up the good work my man!

I start out every single business day by checking on the threads here at Sirius Buzz. I get to keep up on the various weather reports around the nation thanks to our comedy filled members. I get to read up on political viewpoints that I never considered thanks to John and Havakasha. The Market Place thread is a huge help in sharing ideas with other investors about stocks other than SIRI.

So, in short, Sirius Buzz is the best thing going in my opinion. And I am very happy to be associated with you and the other fine members here.

Thanks for all that you and Charles do. I really appreciate it!

Chuck Sowers

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by just sirius

John

I know...he started it...but Selena777 is correct...move it to the political thread...there you can kick his ass all you want!

And yes...I would enjoy it immensly...and yes suck ass was pretty funny!

JS

---

Just Sirius, I was thinking that maybe you and John could start a new thread all about kicking ass, kissing ass, and sucking ass because they seem to be subjects you and John know an AWFUL lot about.:D

Spencer, i would just like to concur that you do a GREAT job here providing us all with timely and objective information about SXM. Keep up the good work and i hope you can overcome your personal situation,as well as the financial difficulties that you incur in putting this site together.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Havakasha

Wow you ACTUALLY predicted that the party out of power was going to pick up seats in a Congressional elections 2 years from a Presidential election (mid-term elections)? You are an absolute genius. LMFAO. Oh and you predicted that the Republicans were going to call Obama and the Democrats extreme left and even Socialist? Wow another example of genius. What kind of drugs or drink are you taking?

"Over the last 17 midterm elections the party of the President has lost an average of 28 seats in Congressional elections". And you say you do research? Nonsense. But you sure do you like to congratulate yourself on bullshit. Typical John.

Can you please show me where I EVER said Democrats would gain seats in 2010? Another one of your lies. EVERYONE knows that the party of out power gains seats in midterm Congressional elections. Do you read or study politics? Jeez.

Yeah and the earth's temperature has been cooling over the last decade and will be cooling over this next decade. LOL. You are really blind. Keep listening to Palin and Beck and the lies they tell. Enough said.

Please move this over to the chat and or politics thread. You have said any number of times you will not engage me in debate. Well then please stop or risk being called dishonest.

---

Bush picked up seats in his 2002 midterm!!!!!!! Next few except me told you long ago that the democrats would lose as BIG and that they would not only lose that BIG but that the ones running against them would be running on a way more conservative platform. That was during a time when MOST everyone was trying to say that conservativism was dead. Yes that means I was saying things most were not and I was right once again when most were wrong.

I know it is hard for you but read the comment correctly, I said; "people LIKE Havuscker" There have been many LIKE YOU that have actually said, democrats would pick up even more seats.

That example of the earth is not cooling in the last decade, is just another example of your stupidity. I have shown you the fact of what the actual temperatures have been and the graph of what that shows which is that since 2000 the earth has in fact cooled. I am now backed up by several of scientist that were on your side and even ones that are still on your side of the arguement. I Even gave you the link where, Bill Nye could not dispute that fact, just that the graph does not go back far enough.

I dont and dumbass ONCE AGAIN it was you that brought this here to this thread. I know you are such a twit you dont remember that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Selena777

what does that have to do with anything? I come here to hear about SIRI. If I wanted to hear Dem-bashing, I could go to any of the various online curmudgeon gatherings. Take it to the Political sub-forum.

---

hummm, tell that to havusucker if he did not spew political misinformation in the first place here, then I would not even bother to correct him here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by just sirius

John

I know...he started it...but Selena777 is correct...move it to the political thread...there you can kick his ass all you want!

And yes...I would enjoy it immensly...and yes suck ass was pretty funny!

JS

---

I dont because as I have been told and has been proven if you dont give havasucker a forum of popularity then few even bother to read his crap. The only reason I bother here in this thread is because this thread gets read so when he puts out crap I respond to it. I will continue to do so until he is stopped by the moderators. If you guys dont want it here, then just tell havasucker not to put it here in the first place.

Hey, does anyone know what's happening today? I thought the "peaking at 1.00" thing was because of the market last week, but now SIRI's underperforming relative to the market. Is this the "new normal", at least for the next few months? The volume is pretty low - is the price change due to shorting?

Quote:

---

The only reason I bother here in this thread is because this thread gets read so when he puts out crap I respond to it.

---

So do people need to stop visiting this thread and construct another, topical one... maybe call it "the srs business weekly"? *headdesk*

Quote:

---

I will continue to do so until he is stopped by the moderators.

---

Because "taking the high road" is for pansies.

Havakasha, what hell hath ye wrought? FTLOG, It's like opening the newspaper up and having to flip through pages full of /b/.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spencer Osborne

I would rather not write about this, but it appears I am being accused of using Brandon as research and following his articles with my own based on what he writes. He is also accusing me of using analystb reports for my research.

"Look at siriusbuzz for example. I put out an article on sac, he spits one out on the same subject after reading mine. Playground…Demian’s latest is a rip off of Erik Savitz. All of them learned about the Russell from me, and all claimed credit for making their readers aware of it. They write articles that are nothing more than comments on my articles. They are incapable of an original thought and rely on analysts to provide their content. What happens when the analysts turn negative on siri? I do the work. I do the research. Everyone else benefits."

1. I date and time-stamp every article I publish. I wrote about higher line item cost for SAC and that it would impact EBITDA at 3:30 PM on July 7, 2010 (http://siriusbuzz.com/a-deeper-look-...q2-metrics.php). On July 8th I wrote about SAC costs again (http://siriusbuzz.com/sirius-xm-and-manipulation.php). Brandon wrote about SAC on July 9th. This begs the question. How did I read his article to do my research before writing my own? The answer is that I do not rely on Brandon for my research. I do my own.

2. The Russell was well known to everyone. We all remember the day they were removed and why. Brandon brought up the Russell when the stock was still well below $1.00. The company needed to get above $1.00 to get back on the Russell. I began writing about it after SIRI regained compliance. Everyone wrote about it. Typically I do not go that far in advance just to take credit for something everyone will know about later on. If someone writes about the NFL contract, or the FCC opening for comments on price increases this fall will you see me saying "I told everyone first"? No. These are news items that will come up soon, but everyone that follows the sector should be aware.

3. Brandon states that I am incapable of an original thought. I beg to differ. When no other site was following the auto channel closely, it was me that did it. I am the one that broke the auto channel down into the categories of the types of subs they deliver. I do not rely on analysts for my research. I do look at their models and report the analysts opinion. I do tell readers where I agree and disagree with the analysts. I read what all of the sites out there have to say, but do not base my articles on what other sites say. Sometimes I write about a subject to offer more clarity in a response to several people asking questions or wanting clarification. My style is to get out the news of something un-jaded, then write a more in depth piece regarding the subject based on my own research.

4. This site is proud to be free for readers, and to not ask for donations for the work we do. Doing a site does take a lot of hours. I am in the middle of a divorce myself that has drained my finances. I was laid off in March and am in school taking classes. Money is tight.... very tight. You do not see me asking for donations for the hours I put into this. The ads on any satellite radio site cover the costs, and allow for a very modest profit. If I did not enjoy doing this, I wouldn't. Each month I look at what comes in the door and compare it to the hours spent researching and writing and scratch my head wondering about how little I actually make from this. If I broke it down, it is probably less than 10 cents an hour.

I respect the work anyone does on any site. I know it takes hours. I know it takes dedication. Everyone of these sites are covering the same thing, and will publish articles about the same thing. I try to do my best to do that in a timely manner and without drama. I have been libeled, slandered, have had people try to extort me, and have for the most part not brought that to this site. I have pulled out of certain services on principle because they have rules and quality standards that are being broken by others. I believe in those rules and believe that I am on a higher road for following them.

The fact of the matter is that a satellite radio site can not provide a full time income even with sponsors. If it did, there would be many more people doing it. Sites like these are not done for profit. If it was all about money I would put up a donation button and bring it up frequently in the forums and articles, or switch to a pure subscription model. The problem I have with donations is that there is no accountability for them. I pay taxes on what I make at SiriusBuzz, and in fact, my donations to charity outpace any income I make from the site by a healthy margin, even with money being as tight as it is. At SiriusBuzz the content is the same price for all....FREE. A donation based site is unfair to readers in several respects. One reader sends $200.00, and another $20, but no one know who gave or how much was given. People donate out of peer pressure and fear for being seen as a non-supporter. The only way to get a certain tag is to donate. It "divides the classes" and creates a micro class warfare on a site. IMO either do this because you like to do it, do it as a fair and equitable subscription site, or don't do it at all. The fact of the matter is that satellite radio sites do not provide a full time income. That is why most with such sites either have work or are active in trying to find work.

I do my own research. I use my own tag lines. I come up with my own material. I do not play on peoples fears. Earlier this month I had a legal issue surrounding this site. I couldn't write for 5 days. Did I tell you the reader about it? No. Was there a danger that the site would have been closed? Yes. I dealt with the issue so that I could write again. The issue is still in negotiations, and there could well be substantial costs involved. I am dealing with it, not asking you the reader to deal with it. Life is tough, but I handle my own stuff. I do not come here asking you readers to deal with my issues or make me a living.

Hopefully I will not have to write about this again.

---

Thats is because Brandon is a dishonest twit. You would have thought most people would have known to stay away from him in the first place. I tried to tell people he is dishonest and once you deal with dishonest people chances are you will get burned by them. I found him so dishonest, I would not even trust him with the little information one needed to give him to sign onto the forums. I also find even the mere mentioning of donations to the site, to be disgusting. You are correct if you want to go that route then make it a subscription site.

As for you Tyler anyone that has been involved in SIRI/XMSR, knows who is who. For those like havasucker, Tyler Savery (Spencer Osborne) is the one and only person to get a well rounded researched analysis from. I have said it long ago well before any of the other sites started, "I cant believe Tyler spends the time he does on giving us this kinds of information, FREE OF CHARGE". I will even go as far as to say that everything I have learned and posts I make on SIRIXM have come because of Tyler passing his information on to us HO so long ago. I would not have been able to come as close as I have these last few quarters if not for learning what all the metrics mean, from Tyler.

Additionally, I thought the Russell addition was supposed to stablize the price point of the stock...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Selena777

Hey, does anyone know what's happening today? I thought the "peaking at 1.00" thing was because of the market last week, but now SIRI's underperforming relative to the market. Is this the "new normal", at least for the next few months? The volume is pretty low - is the price change due to shorting?

---

Yes, that this pig will prove you wrong everytime you try to predict where the PPS will go. That is why, while I will predict certain things, I tell people that trying to predict the PPS of this pig is like trying to predict the lottery.