Just look above your post.
Printable View
Just look above your post.
CLIMATE SCIENTISTS JOHN. LOL. You cant escape the truth. ITS GOING TO HAUNT YOU.! Dont make me go back and show you the study that says the more you study the CLIMATE SCIENCES the more you believe that human activity causes global warming and climate change.
DID YOU REMEMBER WHO SENATOR INHOFE WAS YET? Remember saying only 40% of scientists believe in global warming? LOL.Want to backrack on that cause you got that information from Senator INHOFE's blog. Did you take a look at his discredited petition yet? i notice you been awful quiet about that one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havakasha
Ho really you must have missed this thread so here it is again.
http://siriusbuzz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2753
There you go again with your porno references. We are having a discussion about politics something you have yet to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by socalrunningfool
Whats really hilarious is that you are actually following this thread. LOL.
Havent heard you talk about sulfur "airsols" for a while after i knocked that one out of the park.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havakasha
He gets a kick out of me kicking your ass in debates. I cant blame him the only reason I even play around with you is it is funny how illogical you are.
Personally I cant believe anyone that has been found out to have 2 seperate names and use them as you did to agree with yourself would even write here again. I would be so imbarrassed you would not even see me here again. Then again that is the difference between you Havakasha (or is it lloyd) and I.
I think we should charge money to let Mr. fool watch our show. He really doesnt contribute much of significance does he? I say we give his money to a good cause that we both can support.
i point out flaws in the petitions you present but I'm the illogical one. LOL>
You been doing drugs again?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havakasha
Is this what you are talking about. ARE YOU KIDDING ME. The point about sulfur is that volcanos emit more of that then CO2. You just proved my point again. Do you even read what you put up.
Why do you think I added this in the first place (read that last two words carefully):
I think you better check with what the EPA has to say about what kinds of global warming gases there are: "Environmental Protection Agency on April 17, 2009 issued a proposed finding that contribute to climate change. The six gases; carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride"
P.S. Not that I trust what the IPCC says anymore.
➢ The IPCC’s 2007 climate summary overstated CO2’s impact on temperature by 500-2000%;
➢ CO2 enrichment will add little more than 1 °F (0.6 °C) to global mean surface temperature by 2100;
➢ Not one of the three key variables whose product is climate sensitivity can be measured directly;
➢ The IPCC’s values for these key variables are taken from only four published papers, not 2,500;
➢ The IPCC’s values for each of the three variables, and hence for climate sensitivity, are overstated;
➢ “Global warming” halted ten years ago, and surface temperature has been falling for seven years;
➢ Not one of the computer models relied upon by the IPCC predicted so long and rapid a cooling;
➢ The IPCC inserted a table into the scientists’ draft, overstating the effect of ice-melt by 1000%;
➢ It was proved 50 years ago that predicting climate more than two weeks ahead is impossible;
➢ Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s largest moon, and Pluto warmed at the same time as Earth warmed;
➢ In the past 70 years the Sun was more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years.
yea you knocked it right into my park, thank you, you dumbass, LOLOLOLOL.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havakasha
Really to be honest lloyd I would not even be here anymore if I where you. I think you have been here long enough to know how people feel about people that do what you did. I am sure you saw the post on Brandon and how people here feel about him after doing what you did. No one respects it and nor do I. YOU DONT USE 2 NAMES (unless you make it clear who you really are) AND THEN YOU FOR SURE DONT USE THAT OTHER NAME TO AGREE WITH YOUR OTHER NAME. You did both and as far a I am concerned and from what I saw posted about Brandon from others it is one of the lowest distrustful things a bloger can do. I am just telling you that is how most look at you now.
P.S. you can say you where having fun all you want. People dont believe it, especially when you only admit it after you have been found out. Things would have been different if you would have admitted it before that fact but you didn't so they dont.