FAZ is making a move and its cheap. BAC could have a red mark on the board, that does not happen much with them.
Relmor what do you think of a triple short of the financials on the Russell, FAZ?
Printable View
FAZ is making a move and its cheap. BAC could have a red mark on the board, that does not happen much with them.
Relmor what do you think of a triple short of the financials on the Russell, FAZ?
What I was trying to say about these companies is that they ARE surviving. If we would have let BOA or GE (which does a lot more than financial) or Ford (which didn't need our help) fail, unemployment and the recession would have been much worse.
The fact that WE as Americans stepped in and helped them out shows me that this is a great place to invest in.
We won't fail ourselves, because we're smarter than that.
Sirrius will survive and thrive because it's an innovative idea that really doesn't have any competition yet.
My one concern is that the buying habbits of Americans has changed (and that is probably a good thing). I hope we'll still part with 15 bucks a month for entertainment.
I wish Sirrius would find a proper way to stream the content through the web at a reasonable price. That will be the iccing on the cake!
Just had a R/S to make it more bulky to own. The market is going up, stalling, retracing barely, and going back up again. Is this a trend you want to fight against? Not so sure. At 10000 or 9500, I might be more inclinded. C just broke out, so im not so sure. Granted C is not on the index, but it is a bank that people follow.
Being a Business Major, I do take that into consideration.
Over the past year, we've been able to negotiate better lease terms. They were getting out of hand, and now they are reasonable again. We've seen very little increase in basic wholesale prices. And our employees are living without the standard 6% yearly raises we were paying for the last 10 years. Now they get 2%.
I think more and more companies will be telling this same tale.
My paycheck as owner is a bit lower. But, to be honest, it was too high to begin with.
I think we all got a shock last year and now we're hopefully going to remember those lessons and try a bit harder to live within our means.
It's just a hope of mine. But, I've always been a positive thinker. It's been a pretty good approach for the last 54 years. I think I'll keep thinking positively!
Please, are you kidding me, here is the link to the thread I started, goto the 15 line down. It is in black and white.
http://siriusbuzz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1817
Did you notice the date of that thread and that does not include all the other times I have said it BEFORE in post.
Candleman, I see your angle and that is one school of thought, but the other school, Rick Santelli, feels the recession would be about 6 months over if capitalism would have eaten those companies up. By fluffing or propping those companies up we have elongated the dip, turned a v into an L. Our economy is consumer based and right now stupid people can't take from their HELOC loans to make stupid purchases...ie above ground pools, trampolines, riding john deere toy for little Johnny. In the past 5years most purchases were items people could not afford without the wealth affect from housing. Now the wealth is gone, a few trillion or so, and it is not coming back to zero growth for maybe 3-5yrs....at this point your mortgage payments will be back to one for one. Maybe a few years after that real estate might appreciate, yeah. Just something to think about.
Real Estate is dead and all the businesses that go with it are too. Shit commercial lending has not even hit the fan yet.
candleman, while I think what you are doing for the American way of life is good and I thank you for it. I have to say that while sales are better by 6% over 1997 that did not make up for the cost you had to pay for inflation on everything else. Are you going to try and tell me that you got a reduction on your lease at a time when everyone else was paying more 1997 to 2004. Maybe now you got a reduction in rent but that was after huge increases. the point being even if you take into account a small inflation rate of 3% (cost of living) then a 6 % increase in sales from 1997 is not going to make up for it.
candelman, I dont know your bussiness but what I do know is that from what you said, if your sales are only 6% better then they were in 1997 then you are not making even close to what you did in 1997 even with a 6% increase in sales.
new hack at theculdesac.com has JC's latest bash piece out . . rough.
Goldman Sachs must be planning a buy
It's actually pretty humorous:
"The company continues to bleed, and I don't think that "cash for clunkers" is going to save it. Subscribership continues to decline. The balance sheet is a mess. Investors don't care about the better guidance, and the stock is selling off once again."
where does JC find these feckless shills?