Sirius founder had a sex change and is now a woman and a total bitch!

so??????? she/he can work on the human genome project and still be a complete headcase with issues and be completely ****ing wrong on her perception of sat radio. So screw her/him charles u just want to talk shit about sirius thats all you ever do. Lovely you reran this stupid ass article thats everywhere already. No one fkin cares her/his opinion is worthless simply cause internet based radio will never be near as big a sat radio and terrestrial radio.. Im not gonna attack her for work o the human genome im gonna hit her where it hurts which is how he went and became a she. She's attacking one of my stocks which i care about, its like attacking my kids. I will **** you up. Plus he/she is one of the founders of sirius so thats like my mother hitting my sister its just ****ed up, You dont even own any siri stock charles go to the general forum and leave the investors alone. Your just a basher now, even defending the biased completely corrupt media, pfff whatever.

To begin with, it wasn't her. Fortune presented a very fair article which made both cases. It was the later day version by paidcontent which deleted 1 side of the argument and only presented her side. Paidcontent's article came out shortly after 1pm. Look what happened to the stock as the "media" began to pick it up.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Sirius...-14657738.html

The fortune article was there all morning, and the stock rose as a result.

How long has he/she been out of Sirius?

Pretty long, she knows nothing of current plans of management.

So he/she is nothing but a lackey of the NAB!

I really don't give a SH*T if he/she built the super collider.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiriusBuzz

If the media was positive on the company it would have been irresponsible. That is all I can say. I debunk a lot of the bullshit you mentioned above (even though the media talking about Howard Sterns contract didn't do anything but help Sirius XM by reminding people about Howard Stern) but, these latest rounds of calling out a company which refuses to evolve are very valid IMO.

It's just funny to me how we deflect the validity of something now because of a persons sex. For some reason her comments are viewed as a negative spin by the media? How? They are her comments, all the media did was report them. Not reporting the comments of the person who founded the company would be irresponsible biased journalism.

---

Youve just set me off.
Irresponsible. Hold for "irresponsible articles, ill be pulling them all night". Get ready youve just opened your mouth one too many times on this lame, useless topic.

Please hit refresh on this post, because I will be posting more all night and tomorrow for Charlie. Heres irresponsible article number 1:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1244...d?source=yahoo
Number 2:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Analys...-14345922.html
Number 3:
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker...s-Shareholders My favorite, actually calling the stock worthless and paying stockholders our condolences.
Number 4: This ones great. Uses no facts, and bashers the company from opening to close. Takes shots at Howard, hows hes been a failure(facts say otherwise) but Terrestrial radio would be great to have him back?!! WHAT!!???
http://www.minyanville.com/articles/...088/from/yahoo
Then theirs the WS using an "unnamed source" to leak BK eventuallity(no one leaks a BK filing, in fact, if one were coming, they would need to file their intent long before Feb 17th was even approaching.") All "last second BK filings are bogus", and responsible journalists should know that. Hold on, Ill go get more. This is easy.
Number 5: Not only were these not the only options for Sirius, the option they took wasnt even mentioned as a possiblity. Nice responsible journalism. In fact this will be my only example of a Motely Fool article, as they are all irresponsible.
http://www.fool.com/investing/divide...or-sirius.aspx

Wait till I get to the ones PREMERGER. Thats when the fun starts.
Heres a buy recommendation from street.com from June. As were most analyist reporting buys still on this stock.
Number 6:
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10422...ngs-apple.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

whatever charles i think people have the right to chop their balls off if they want, and i have the right to think they are ****ing wierd for doing it. I think her/him/his opinion is worthless and he/she should go **** themselves.

---

CHOPPER SIC BALLS!!!...man you people are cracking me up....beginning to think it's a full moon out :D

Wait for it, wait for it.

Here comes the pump for pandora or slacker.

The paidcontent.org aritcle was pretty lame. It was obviously biased.. but it didn't pose any new information. All that garbage we are already well aware of. As for stock price... I thought it dropped a bit on some profit taking in the afternoon... but hey.. what do i know?

yeah doobz i agree with you i dont think the article tanked the sp i think the mm's did they created a ceiling at .25 and to make it less obvious they brought it down even lower same thing they did at .20, tommorow we clear .25 np what so ever.

I believe I read an article, that the Wi-max group was slowing down their roll out; because of a lack of money!

Internet radio will make it easier for everyone to have a radio station, but not everyone will have content you want to listen too!

Sirius will beat them to the punch by expanding their internet presence.