Thats ok..I meant no malice by posting it here so others who dont go to wave can see whats developing. will not bring articles over here from wave.
you can delete it with my permission..fear not about me being censored.
Printable View
Let's avoid mention specifics of the sites and the principals of those sites. That type of discussion could be construed as slanderous if things are not worded exactly right. This is part of the reason there was a whole issue between Hartlieb and Brandon. The parcing of words, and whether they are slanderous, etc. I do not want to go down the path of being accused of censoring discussion, and I hope all of you understand that there may be a need to adjust the wording of some posts with respect to this issue (if complaints arise).
There are opinions out there about what is right and wrong from an "advisor" standpoint. This site maintains certain standards and other sites have their own standards. I make it a strict point to avoid giving advice. I also make it a strict point (as does seeking alpha) to disclose my positions and trading activities on my articles. My personal policy is to simply avoid any trades in the equity.
SiriusHope.....
I do not take exception to the bringing of the article, nor discussion of articles from other sites. I hope you did not take it that way. You are free to discuss whatever you want here (within legal reason of course....LOL). What I was asking was that you give the site that published the article a shot at getting a "click" and having the article viewed there. In other words, if a click represents a penny, and 100 people read the entire article here, we would be taking $1.00 away from the site of the author. I simply wanted them to have the rewards for their efforts.
Cheers
Sirius hope.....no need to delete at all. All is well. I just wanted to clarify why I made the edit to your post so as not to go down a path of being accused of being a censor (not by you but by others). What I did is to the benefit of satwaves. In essence I turned your post into a "teaser" that people will follow to that site.
That being said, it would always be nice to see your own opinion on the ppiece as well.
Despite the wranglings of the past few weeks, I have no malice intent towards satwaves. They run their site the way they want, and that is how it should be.
Do i have to tell you the difference of the two?
You know what i mean,a loose cannon is dangerous,alot of people in our human history have been lynched, burned at stake,fed to the lions,persecuted and outed for false rumors reported as fact to the sheep and
turned into fact....Speaking from the heart is one thing,reporting as fact is deadly,EX:what if someone takes advice and kills self because his wife found out he lost the college fund investing,it has already happened and will again..
That's not even taking into account the litigation issue..
And don't think for 1 second if someone sues they won't subpeona the post's,
and drag certain people into testifying..HINT....Not happening i agree,but there are nuts who sue for any reason out there..
Great, interesting discussion. I forgot about watching the stock
today. Saved me from moaning and groaning, at least for a few hours. :)
My opinion on the piece is insignificant...all i can say is that's a longggggggg stretch of what will happen. IMO...the iphone app will be big disappointment in PPS increase.
So many investors are grabbing for straws on this one. The only way we see PPS increase where it should be is after few quarters of pure profit. END of story.
PROFIT,YOUR TALKING ABOUT PROFIT????PROFIT...A.I. see if anyone gets it.
Agreed Sirius,it is always about profit and how we get it...I-Phone is just 5%of bottom line at best MHO,definitely should get into it for younger hip audience,but PROFIT is KING for stock buyers..
And we are not profitable YET!!!! real close tho...
I think there is a glimmer of potential with something in the piece that got me curious.
At one point XM inrduced an antenna that had the chipset embedded in it. This enabled the end user to use the antenna on XM enabled devices.
If Sirius XM were to market a docking station that housed the satellite chipset and included a SDARS antenna, then the iPhone could literlly become a defacto satellite receiver and decoder of sorts. This means that the cost to the company to deliver the service is substantially less because of rayalties. For the consumer, they are not eating up minutes on their data plan unless they undock.
IMO, the pain here is the coordination between the iPhone and the dock. A consumer would not want to buy two subscriptions (one for the dock, and another for the iPhone). If through software they can marry an iPhone to a dock, then we can see the consumer only needing to pay the $16 per month, and get the best of both worlds. Full satellite feed in the dock, and great internet feed out of the dock.
Funny line Julie,even tho i know you didn't mean to make it sound like that,
Breaking news:Sirius Buzz forum discussion on lawsuits and ADVICE and OPINION difference in meaning interupts Julietoo's S*X life....
Being harmless here hope you take it in the spirit meant..
P.S. just saw what i typed looked like,,geez,changed it to what i meant...S*X
:smash: they vare still chipping away at that .35 wall and a little capitulation by sellers is begining to happen,we make break below .35 or go up. to green for the day..
Alright, with over 2 mill wanting to buy in @ .3500, shouldn't the price be going up?
Tyler also, I have to ask did Demian ever get his radio or did anyone get the radio offered in that contest. I have to say that if not it really should have been.
Yeah,it's funny i wondered where you went that day and then the next day i saw a post by someone to go defend the article against john,went and looked and had this vision of steam coming out of your ears as you were driving over there...Can't believe Homer didn't know either..
then i see you guys with Tyler discussing it on the wed ,thread.....