Sirius founder had a sex change and is now a woman and a total bitch!

so??????? she/he can work on the human genome project and still be a complete headcase with issues and be completely ****ing wrong on her perception of sat radio. So screw her/him charles u just want to talk shit about sirius thats all you ever do. Lovely you reran this stupid ass article thats everywhere already. No one fkin cares her/his opinion is worthless simply cause internet based radio will never be near as big a sat radio and terrestrial radio.. Im not gonna attack her for work o the human genome im gonna hit her where it hurts which is how he went and became a she. She's attacking one of my stocks which i care about, its like attacking my kids. I will **** you up. Plus he/she is one of the founders of sirius so thats like my mother hitting my sister its just ****ed up, You dont even own any siri stock charles go to the general forum and leave the investors alone. Your just a basher now, even defending the biased completely corrupt media, pfff whatever.

To begin with, it wasn't her. Fortune presented a very fair article which made both cases. It was the later day version by paidcontent which deleted 1 side of the argument and only presented her side. Paidcontent's article came out shortly after 1pm. Look what happened to the stock as the "media" began to pick it up.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Sirius...-14657738.html

The fortune article was there all morning, and the stock rose as a result.

How long has he/she been out of Sirius?

Pretty long, she knows nothing of current plans of management.

So he/she is nothing but a lackey of the NAB!

I really don't give a SH*T if he/she built the super collider.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiriusBuzz

If the media was positive on the company it would have been irresponsible. That is all I can say. I debunk a lot of the bullshit you mentioned above (even though the media talking about Howard Sterns contract didn't do anything but help Sirius XM by reminding people about Howard Stern) but, these latest rounds of calling out a company which refuses to evolve are very valid IMO.

It's just funny to me how we deflect the validity of something now because of a persons sex. For some reason her comments are viewed as a negative spin by the media? How? They are her comments, all the media did was report them. Not reporting the comments of the person who founded the company would be irresponsible biased journalism.

---

Youve just set me off.
Irresponsible. Hold for "irresponsible articles, ill be pulling them all night". Get ready youve just opened your mouth one too many times on this lame, useless topic.

Please hit refresh on this post, because I will be posting more all night and tomorrow for Charlie. Heres irresponsible article number 1:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1244...d?source=yahoo
Number 2:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Analys...-14345922.html
Number 3:
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker...s-Shareholders My favorite, actually calling the stock worthless and paying stockholders our condolences.
Number 4: This ones great. Uses no facts, and bashers the company from opening to close. Takes shots at Howard, hows hes been a failure(facts say otherwise) but Terrestrial radio would be great to have him back?!! WHAT!!???
http://www.minyanville.com/articles/...088/from/yahoo
Then theirs the WS using an "unnamed source" to leak BK eventuallity(no one leaks a BK filing, in fact, if one were coming, they would need to file their intent long before Feb 17th was even approaching.") All "last second BK filings are bogus", and responsible journalists should know that. Hold on, Ill go get more. This is easy.
Number 5: Not only were these not the only options for Sirius, the option they took wasnt even mentioned as a possiblity. Nice responsible journalism. In fact this will be my only example of a Motely Fool article, as they are all irresponsible.
http://www.fool.com/investing/divide...or-sirius.aspx

Wait till I get to the ones PREMERGER. Thats when the fun starts.
Heres a buy recommendation from street.com from June. As were most analyist reporting buys still on this stock.
Number 6:
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10422...ngs-apple.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

whatever charles i think people have the right to chop their balls off if they want, and i have the right to think they are ****ing wierd for doing it. I think her/him/his opinion is worthless and he/she should go **** themselves.

---

CHOPPER SIC BALLS!!!...man you people are cracking me up....beginning to think it's a full moon out :D

Wait for it, wait for it.

Here comes the pump for pandora or slacker.

The paidcontent.org aritcle was pretty lame. It was obviously biased.. but it didn't pose any new information. All that garbage we are already well aware of. As for stock price... I thought it dropped a bit on some profit taking in the afternoon... but hey.. what do i know?

yeah doobz i agree with you i dont think the article tanked the sp i think the mm's did they created a ceiling at .25 and to make it less obvious they brought it down even lower same thing they did at .20, tommorow we clear .25 np what so ever.

I believe I read an article, that the Wi-max group was slowing down their roll out; because of a lack of money!

Internet radio will make it easier for everyone to have a radio station, but not everyone will have content you want to listen too!

Sirius will beat them to the punch by expanding their internet presence.

no to mention once they hjave to start paying royalties like sat rad.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

internet radio is a joke, just wait there are many reasons it wont ever take off in a main stream way.

---

It already has.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

Omg its so hard to come up with the idea of sat radio!!!! lets see we have sat phones sat tv and oh yeah i got it sat radio!!!! im a genius!!!!!!!

---

She didn't just come up with the idea, she developed it. Back in 1983 BTW. Of course it doesn't sound amazing in 2009 but you are forgetting she launched her first of four satellite companies in 1983... 26 years ago. Back before you even had cable television.

She was also retained by NASA to obtain FCC approval for the IEEE c-band system on its tracking and data relay satellites and by the National Academy of Sciences' Committee on Radio Frequencies to safeguard before the FCC radio astronomy quiet bands used for deep space research.

Let me reiterate... she was retained by NASA. Has NASA ever knocked on your door?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

no to mention once they hjave to start paying royalties like sat rad.

---

Music industry will kill internet radio as a free service. Its a non issue. Someone up with the times should know that pandora listeners are getting sick of the repeat songs, and the NON VARIETY. Its boring after a while, and the need to keep reminding you your listening is annoying. Ads are getting bigger, longer to load, and more annoying as well. They wont be in business long enough to matter. Didnt MUSAK just go out of business? Once you buy SATRD you dont go back. Ive never seen it in my experience.

I have to agree with Charles on this one: what someone does with their body is immaterial to whatever opinion they have. I have my opinions about people that do things to themselves, but shouldn't we judge an opinion based on what was said as opposed to body parts? I understand that many folks don't like negative opinions being shared by high profile entities (people, news orgs or what have you), but you do have to let certain things go and listen to what they're saying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiriusBuzz

It already has.



She didn't just come up with the idea, she developed it. Back in 1983 BTW. Of course it doesn't sound amazing in 2009 but you are forgetting she launched her first of four satellite companies in 1983... 26 years ago. Back before you even had cable television.

She was also retained by NASA to obtain FCC approval for the IEEE c-band system on its tracking and data relay satellites and by the National Academy of Sciences' Committee on Radio Frequencies to safeguard before the FCC radio astronomy quiet bands used for deep space research.

Let me reiterate... she was retained by NASA. Has NASA ever knocked on your door?

---

So when you are shutting the site down then? Since you already sold your stock, and you think the company is doomed? Will Tyler or Brandon be keeping the site open, or are you bunch of babies still crying over that articles to think about it yet?
The news you choose to listen to is amazing. Shes not any expert on consumer products or marketing. Shes a nerd that decided to be a man, that is bitter this is happening when shes not a part of it. If you cant see that, then I really cant help you.
O, do you want me to post the 100 articles by Brandon and Tyler "irresponsibly" pumping this stock from Jan to June of 08 and beyond? Or can you just go look back on them for yourself? Since they were wrong 400 days at least or more straight, does that make then irresponsible, wrong, or just late?
Irresponsible journalism is all you get in the media, but now is the time for honesty and honor huh? Unfricken believable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RMAN

Internet radio will make it easier for everyone to have a radio station, but not everyone will have content you want to listen too!

Sirius will beat them to the punch by expanding their internet presence.

---

I agree but, Howard Stern isn't going to be around forever. They need to develop and secure the future.

I also hope to all hell that they expand their internet presence but, I have no reason to believe that they will. Nothing has changed in over 3 years... not one simple update to their archaic media player. I don't even know how happy I will be if they finally do because I will always question if management did it because everyone with a pen was writing about how stupid they were for not doing it. The reality is that this kind of stuff is relatively peanuts and if it were their own in-house idea... it would have been done years ago and it would still be on ongoing process today.

I work for a software company, we put out new versions of our software with expanded features on a quarterly basis. Thats nothing special, anyone who does this kind of stuff for a living would tell you the same thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Siriusly

I have to agree with Charles on this one: what someone does with their body is immaterial to whatever opinion they have. I have my opinions about people that do things to themselves, but shouldn't we judge an opinion based on what was said as opposed to body parts? I understand that many folks don't like negative opinions being shared by high profile entities (people, news orgs or what have you), but you do have to let certain things go and listen to what they're saying.

---

Because she decided sat technology would be useful as a radio delivery system gives you no "special" qualities to forcast the future. Its a no brainer then, and its a no brainer now. When you grow to 20 million subs, and now you bash it, come one. ANd to reprint the article quotes... Nice timing. LOL Shes a joke, and shes obviously has problems.
lol
Thats irresponsible, and unnecessary. Your hilarious Charlie.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by relmor2003

Music industry will kill internet radio as a free service. Its a non issue. Someone up with the times should know that pandora listeners are getting sick of the repeat songs, and the NON VARIETY. Its boring after a while, and the need to keep reminding you your listening is annoying. Ads are getting bigger, longer to load, and more annoying as well. They wont be in business long enough to matter. Didnt MUSAK just go out of business? Once you buy SATRD you dont go back. Ive never seen it in my experience.

---

If pandora listeners are sick of repeat content, remember that inventions are borne from necessity. Someone will eventually find the balance between what a listener will tolerate and a model that can capitalize on it. My personal opinion is that Sirius will die if it take evolution lessons from Netflix. Those guys seriously have their shit together and shows you the difference between a business model that's adapted and a model that hasn't.

Hope is obviously not lost but the fat lady hasn't exactly left the building either.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RMAN

I believe I read an article, that the Wi-max group was slowing down their roll out; because of a lack of money!

Internet radio will make it easier for everyone to have a radio station, but not everyone will have content you want to listen too!

Sirius will beat them to the punch by expanding their internet presence.

---

Pandora content is the same songs over and over and over again. About much threat to SiriusXM as Clear Channel is, and we know where they are going. The only thing holding back this company now is competent management, lets see if they are competent now that they are funded, and can focus on their future(which they should have already been doing).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trippingthespeculatingpos

any1 who with goes and has a sex change in my mind has some serious issues and should not be taken seriously, being gay is one thing chopping your balls off is another. I saw this guy get interviewed on stern when he first came to sirius. Weirdo.

---

word...what he said