<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Wharton Trying To Cover David&#8217;s Rehr?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siriusbuzz.com/is-wharton-trying-to-cover-davids-rehr.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siriusbuzz.com/is-wharton-trying-to-cover-davids-rehr.php</link>
	<description>All Things Sirius Satellite Radio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:08:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NAB Has Few Words For Merger - SiriusBuzz</title>
		<link>http://siriusbuzz.com/is-wharton-trying-to-cover-davids-rehr.php/comment-page-1#comment-94076</link>
		<dc:creator>NAB Has Few Words For Merger - SiriusBuzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siriusbuzz.com/is-wharton-trying-to-cover-davids-rehr.php#comment-94076</guid>
		<description>[...] months of delay tactics, hundreds of Ex Parte filings, and even going to the extreme of creating an internet survey where only those responding against the merger were forwarded to the FCC, the National Association [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months of delay tactics, hundreds of Ex Parte filings, and even going to the extreme of creating an internet survey where only those responding against the merger were forwarded to the FCC, the National Association [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://siriusbuzz.com/is-wharton-trying-to-cover-davids-rehr.php/comment-page-1#comment-15370</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siriusbuzz.com/is-wharton-trying-to-cover-davids-rehr.php#comment-15370</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt; The only thing that I could say to the doj and fcc is that xm will go under if there is no merger.

If either company &quot;goes under&quot; it will be Sirius.  Anyone who can read financial statements can see this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; The only thing that I could say to the doj and fcc is that xm will go under if there is no merger.</p>
<p>If either company &#8220;goes under&#8221; it will be Sirius.  Anyone who can read financial statements can see this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Hill</title>
		<link>http://siriusbuzz.com/is-wharton-trying-to-cover-davids-rehr.php/comment-page-1#comment-14418</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siriusbuzz.com/is-wharton-trying-to-cover-davids-rehr.php#comment-14418</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been trading siri or initially bought siri back in Nov. of 06&#039;. The only thing that I could say to the doj and fcc is that xm will go under if there is no merger. Why do I have to sub. to 2 radios, when I can have a better product for a bettr price? I believe siri would not become a monopoly. Who or what investor in their right mind would start up a sat. company nowadays??? The Nab will be ok, radio is what it is... mom and pop in small towns... people need a good sat. radio here... people in large cities... well they have cable tv and all other sorts or stuff that they may at freewill watch and listen to at anytime. We are not in the stoneage anymore and a combined company can and will prevail and a more worldwide scalce in the future I believe... we need as much power and positive transitions in our country now a good sat. company with top of the line tech... is a good company to have on our soil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trading siri or initially bought siri back in Nov. of 06&#8242;. The only thing that I could say to the doj and fcc is that xm will go under if there is no merger. Why do I have to sub. to 2 radios, when I can have a better product for a bettr price? I believe siri would not become a monopoly. Who or what investor in their right mind would start up a sat. company nowadays??? The Nab will be ok, radio is what it is&#8230; mom and pop in small towns&#8230; people need a good sat. radio here&#8230; people in large cities&#8230; well they have cable tv and all other sorts or stuff that they may at freewill watch and listen to at anytime. We are not in the stoneage anymore and a combined company can and will prevail and a more worldwide scalce in the future I believe&#8230; we need as much power and positive transitions in our country now a good sat. company with top of the line tech&#8230; is a good company to have on our soil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
