Page 8 of 9 ... 6789
Results 71 to 80 of 83
  1. john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    06-17-2010, 02:58 PM #71
    Quote Originally Posted by Havakasha View Post
    Just imagine what Bush and Cheney would have got BP do to?
    Obama got BP to promise a minimun of 20 billion, no dividend for the year, a 500 million dollar fund to monitor peoples health for the next 10 years, 100 million for unemployed oil workers.

    Bush and Cheney would have never held BP's feet to the fire the way that
    Obama has.

    Yes you are correct they would have followed the LAW. Lets also not forget that BP had already said LONG BEFORE they would go way beyond to make sure they pay for ALL the cost of the clean up and liability. As to should they also pay for polocies OBAMA put into place once again you would think that is just fine. That is fine with you until it effects your business. Obama called a halt to off shore deep water drilling not BP. They are responsible if THIER regulators did not follow the regulations ALREADY IN EFFECT.

    I am also sure you believe in the samething as Rosie O'Donnell, I think it went something like, just take them over take their money take thier company, call it socialism call it what ever you want just take ALL of them over.


    Yes just like you and Rosie it works great until IT IS YOUR ASSETS THEY ARE COMING FOR.

  2. john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    06-17-2010, 03:13 PM #72
    Here are the facts:

    There is a law EVERYONE AGREED TO, that says there is a cap limit to the liability of a oil company.

    Our own polocies (driven by liberials and environmentalist) have driven oil companies this far out and deep, NOT THE LACK OF EASY OIL ELSEWHERE.

    If that cap was not in there would any oil company take the risk of drilling in the deep water here or would they go else were??

    What happens to the US, if that happens.

    For that answer just take another look at the title of this thead:

    'Humm, isn't funny how the state effect worse by the oil spill say, DONT STOP DRILLING Reply to Thread"

  3. candleman is offline
    Mentor
    candleman's Avatar
    Joined: Jul 2009 Location: Outer Banks of North Carolina Posts: 1,511
    06-17-2010, 04:15 PM #73
    Havakasha, do you ever wonder why JOHN never and I do mean NEVER has anybody defending his stands?

    I wondered about this for awhile. And then I realized that no reasonable person could support his stands and opinions.

    It's really that simple.

  4. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    06-17-2010, 04:29 PM #74
    From what i understand (former Senator George Miitchell confirmed this because he helped draft the original cap) the 75 million cap was set BEFORE deep well drilling ever existed.Therefore that cap should go way up and i believe it will, although im sure Republicans who always support big oil over citizens will be fighting that change. I imagine Congressman Barton will be leading that effort.

    As the past 8 Presidents have stated at one time or another (but unfortunately have not been able to achieve because of lobbyists, lack of foresight etc.) the US needs to get off foreign oil, move to alternative energies, use natural gas more,and conserve energy. If we had done this 30 years ago we wouldnt be having these discussions today. Study after study have indicated that we (U.S.) CANT drilll our way out of this problem. So i would hope that we wean ourselves off oil as fast as possible (knowing we will be using oil for half a century or more for lots of reasons; some out of our control and some in our control) and get on with a saner and cleaner energy policy. Of course the entrenched oil interests and others will fight this effort with claims to try to scare people, but i hope that reason will prevail over time.
    Just because state and local economies are addicted to oil revenues doesnt mean that we cant move away from that addiction. Change is always uncomfortable and the scare mongers wiil be out there to try to say our economy cant survive those changes, but that is all BS.

    People like John who say that hybrids and electric cars will never be technologically and economically viable are an example of those fear mongers who dont know what they are talking about, but try to pretend that they do.
    Time to push hard on hybrid, hybrid plug-ins, electric cars, solar and wind,
    grasses for ethanol, natural gas, and nuclear (especially if they can come up
    with cheaper and safer systems that dont require enormous amounts of water) Its going to take many years to transition to all this but the growth in investment in alternative energies is happening very rapidly and people know that there is a lot of money to be made in this area.

    And john when was it that pure hydrogen fuel cell cars were going to be 1% of automobile sales? You can give me an approximate year. A number in other words. An approximate year?
    I know you have avoided this for about a year but how about some honesty for a change. Scared?
    Last edited by Havakasha; 06-18-2010 at 10:01 AM.

  5. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    06-17-2010, 04:31 PM #75
    Quote Originally Posted by candleman View Post
    Havakasha, do you ever wonder why JOHN never and I do mean NEVER has anybody defending his stands?

    I wondered about this for awhile. And then I realized that no reasonable person could support his stands and opinions.

    It's really that simple.
    NO i dont wonder. Its obvious that he is full of crap.

    Do you think he even knew that the cap was written before deep sea oil wells were even envisioned? Nah!
    Last edited by Havakasha; 06-17-2010 at 04:40 PM.

  6. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    06-17-2010, 04:45 PM #76
    Hey Candleman in fact i am now more sure then ever that he is a certifiable wacko. Remember this is the same guy who said he wouldnt argue with me anymore because he had already won all the arguments. That is shit you just cant make up.

    He actually believes we shouldnt call a temporary halt to offshore drilling to make sure its as safe as it possibly can be.

    Why do so called Conservatives always act so impulsively? Are their radical ideologies compensations for their addicitions (Rush, Beck) and out of control behavoirs? What do you think?
    Last edited by Havakasha; 06-17-2010 at 05:18 PM.

  7. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    06-17-2010, 04:53 PM #77
    New John word for the John/English dictionary.

    John: Polocies
    English: Policies

  8. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    06-17-2010, 05:09 PM #78
    Hey did you hear John is a big fan of Congressman Barton? Yeah the guy who apologized to BP and wants to keep the cap at $75 million?
    Check this out. Look who gets a lot of money from the oil and gas industry. Yep its Congressman Barton of course. Hmmm i wonder if there is a connection? lol.




    Here is the list of contributions to members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee since 2009

    Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., none
    John Barrow, D-Ga., $31,500
    Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470
    Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., $33,500
    Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100
    Mary Bono Mack, R-Calif., $5,750
    Rick Boucher, D-Va., $36,000
    Bruce Braley, D-Iowa, none
    Michael Burgess, R-Texas, $39,350
    G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C., $19,500
    Steve Buyer, R-Ind., $5,000
    Lois Capps, D-Calif., none
    Kathy Castor, D-Fla., none
    Donna Christian-Christensen, D-Virgin Islands, $1,500
    Nathan Deal, R-Ga., none
    Diana DeGette, D-Colo., $2,250
    John D Dingell, D-Mich., $7,000
    Mike Doyle, D-Pa., $8,000
    Eliot L Engel, D-N.Y., none
    Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., none
    Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., $20,500
    Charlie A Gonzalez, D-Texas, $30,000
    Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., $13,500
    Gene Green, D-Texas, $43,500
    Ralph M Hall, R-Texas, $31,250
    Jane Harman, D-Calif., $3,000
    Baron Hill, D-Ind., $2,000
    Jay Inslee, D-Wash., none
    Edward J Markey, D-Mass., $16,000
    Jim Matheson, D-Utah, $47,750
    Doris O Matsui, D-Calif., $7,500
    Jerry McNerney, D-Calif., $3,000
    Charles Melancon, D-La., $65,500
    Chris Murphy, D-Conn., $6,800
    Tim Murphy, R-Pa., $62,950
    Sue Myrick, R-N.C., $11,500
    Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., none
    Joe Pitts, R-Pa., $18,000
    George Radanovich, R-Calif., $14,000
    Mike Rogers, R-Mich., $20,400
    Mike Ross, D-Ark., $76,950
    Bobby L Rush, D-Ill., $1,000
    John Sarbanes, D-Md., $3,300
    Steve Scalise, R-La., $44,335
    Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., none
    John Shadegg, R-Ariz., $13,400
    John M Shimkus, R-Ill., $34,000
    Zachary T Space, D-Ohio, $9,600
    Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., $1,000
    Bart Stupak, D-Mich., $12,000
    John Sullivan, R-Okla., $65,250
    Betty Sue Sutton, D-Ohio, $6,000
    Lee Terry, R-Neb., $30,350
    Fred Upton, R-Mich., $22,000
    Greg Walden, R-Ore., $31,200
    Henry A Waxman, D-Calif., $6,000
    Anthony D Weiner, D-N.Y., none
    Peter Welch, D-Vt., $10,000
    Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., $20,500

  9. candleman is offline
    Mentor
    candleman's Avatar
    Joined: Jul 2009 Location: Outer Banks of North Carolina Posts: 1,511
    06-17-2010, 05:27 PM #79

    Barton apologizes and proves he's a better man than JOHN.

    Barton said, "I apologize for using the term 'shakedown' with regard to yesterday's actions at the White House in my opening statement this morning, and I retract my apology to BP...I regret the impact that my statement this morning implied that BP should not pay for the consequences of their decisions and actions in this incident."


    Yes sir, Rep. Barton made a mistake and like a man stood up and apologized for it. That is a rare thing for Republicans to do. Heck, even George Bush couldn't do it after sending us into a horrible war in IRAQ that has wasted our economy and tens of thousands of lives.

    Mr. Barton realized that he had made a big mistake and acted quickly to fix that mistake. That says a lot for his character. It earns him some respect that he didn't have after apologizing to BP earlier in the day and saying that he was ashamed of what our government had done to BP in order to help our fellow Americans.

    JOHN, Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh and partial term Former Governer Sarah Palin could all take a lesson from this man.

  10. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    06-17-2010, 05:47 PM #80
    Good for Mr. Barton.
    Not so good for John.

    Goodnight.

Page 8 of 9 ... 6789