JOHN it is sulfur AEROSOLS not airsols. LOL. you cant even get the basic terms right but you are one heck of a scientist. LOL>
"one might be tempted to view sulfur pollution as a shield against the warming effect of greenhouse gases, BUT RESEARCHERS WHO HAVE STUDIED AEROSOLS REJECT THAT NOTION, FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS. Sulfur pollution causes acid rain and creates view-robbing haze, not only in cities but also in rural areas such as the Grand Canyon. The United States and many other nations are currently attmepting to reduce sulfur emissions not encourage them. WHAT IS MORE , SULFUR AEROSOLS DO NOT (JOHN IT SAYS DO NOT. YOU KNOW WHAT NOT IS? LOL.) PROVIDE TRUE PROTECTION AGAINST GREENHOUSE GASES, CLIMATE EXPERTS SAY... EVEN IF SULFUR POLLUTION SLOWS A TEMPERATURE RISE IN ONE REGION, IT MIGHT NOT PROTECT THAT REGION FROM DROUGHTS, FLOODS, SEA-LEVEL RISE, OR OTHER CONSEQUENCES OF CLIMATE CHANGE. MOREOVER, AEROSOLS DO NOT PROVIDE COOLING POWER AT NIGHT WHEREAS GREENHOUSE GASES TRAP HEAT 24 HOURS A DAY. PERHAPS BECAUSE OF THIS DIFFERENCE, A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF NIGHTTIME WARMING HAS OCCURRED OVER THE LAST 40 YEARS IN THE U.S., CHINA AND THE FORMER SOVIET UNION."
"IN THE LONG RUN, SULFUR POLLUTION CANNOT KEEP PACE WITH GREENHOUSE GASES, BECAUSE THE LATTER PERSIST IN THE ATMOSPHERE FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS, SAYS JAMES HANSEEN, A CLIMATE MODELER AT NASA'S GODDARD INSTITUTE FOR SPACE STUDIES"
"HANSEN WARNS THAT SULFUR AEROSLS MAY FOSTER A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY BY MASKING THE FULL EXTENT OF THE GREENHOUSE PROBLEM AT PRECISELY THE TIME WHEN INTERVENTION IS MOST FEASIBILE.
WE MAY HAVE A LARGER WARMING IN STORE THAN THE PRESENT TREND WOULD SUGGEST."
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Haze+c...use-a012140641
IN CASE YOU WANT TO READ THE WHOLE THING.