Page 15 of 41 ... 5131415161725 ...
Results 141 to 150 of 407
  1. njbones1 is offline
    Senior Member
    njbones1's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 269
    12-06-2014, 01:27 AM #141
    Mr. F, I have always respected your remarks over the years, but I hope your not loosing it with that $4.85 by Jan. ( what year are you referring to ? )

  2. Faulkner_SA is offline
    Enthusiast
    Faulkner_SA's Avatar
    Joined: Feb 2013 Posts: 223
    12-06-2014, 02:25 AM #142
    It's the top end of where I would expect share price to go. It doesn't have to get there and historically spends a very small amount of time there. Sell target is not "this is where the price will be at that time" but many take it as such. It's simply a price where sentiment changes.

    I take analyst targets the same way though perhaps I am in the minority. If an analyst has a buy rating and $X target I'd expect at the target on or before the date in question, their rating changes to hold or sell (personally I think "hold" is a shit rating :P ).

    Same with sell targets and the price going down. Doesn't mean the person is saying this is the exact number the price will be at on this date... but rather this is the price I would expect would change my position on or before this date.

  3. MUSCLE13 is offline
    Addict
    MUSCLE13's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 973
    12-06-2014, 09:57 AM #143
    Meanwhile Live Nation is hitting all time highs. Liberty has picked another winner here and increased their stake this year. They figured out 2 ways outside of the unprofitable internet streaming companies to make money with music. Sat radio and live concerts.

    How are the artists going to make any decent money as music has become a commodity anybody can get for free on the net? The pennies they get for streaming? No. It's live touring. Selling albums?? Where is Tower Records now............

    Liberty knows what they are doing. Somebody is going to wake up one day and say Live Nation and Sirius belong together. Content and distribution.
    Last edited by MUSCLE13; 12-06-2014 at 10:00 AM.

  4. MUSCLE13 is offline
    Addict
    MUSCLE13's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 973
    12-06-2014, 10:04 AM #144
    What are Faulkner's price targets based on? FCF or EBITDA? Forward or historical? I would like to know. I am always interested in the numbers. I see his price targets, but what valuation metrics are being used to calculate the target? Anybody know? Thanks
    Last edited by MUSCLE13; 12-06-2014 at 10:16 AM.

  5. MUSCLE13 is offline
    Addict
    MUSCLE13's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 973
    12-06-2014, 10:15 AM #145
    I read a lot of analyst reports on media companies. I see companies valued on EBITDA, FCF, Revenues, Discounted Cash Flow, even old fashioned EPS (Disney). But I never see what you guys (besides Steiny who is great at it) are using to value Sirius here...........Why? Let's see it.......We are invested in stocks not lottery tickets. Give me some numbers to study.

  6. dm_4 is offline
    Guru
    dm_4's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Location: Boston, Ma Posts: 3,029
    12-06-2014, 10:50 AM #146
    SF...i know you have mentioned that siri could or may hit the high end of the 4 dollar range as a possibility in jan. I think you may have mentioned that a month ago or so. I guess my question is what do you see being the catalyst for such a move to say even the mid 4's in such a short time period? I know you are not saying its def going there but could. I as many here hope you are correct. If that were to happen....i prob would sell my core. thanks in advance.

  7. crunching.numbers is offline
    12-06-2014, 12:00 PM #147
    Quote Originally Posted by user34615145 View Post
    Isn't this same question Muscle asked above?
    Personally i viewed DM's question as being different. Valuations v catalysts. S.F. tunes muscle out anyways....cant say i blame him, i usually do too.

  8. MUSCLE13 is offline
    Addict
    MUSCLE13's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 973
    12-06-2014, 01:14 PM #148
    Just listened to the Live Nation earnings call from October and I heard Tinker from Maxim ( who is a great analyst) ask a question then reference a stat that i sure didn't like to hear. 2 to 4% margin on reg concerts at the door vs 25% margins on festivals. Live Nation CEO answered with sponsorships at amphitheaters margins can go to 25 or 30%.

    But that's basically advertising. 2 to 4% margin on concerts without sponsorship included??? I didn't know that. Sirius is approaching 40% margins. Sirius should stay away from Live Nation. Growing business but the margins, damn. Those are low. I read Live Nation may be interested in C3 which does Lollapalooza and Austin City Limits festivals. Better margins on those festivals and it may be a way to work a content deal with Sirius since I know Sirius has done deals for the audio from the festivals in the past.

    I really like Live Nation's growth prospects. They are global. These EBITDA margins concern me a bit. Love Sirius' EBITDA margins. Best in media. I am going to listen to Live Nation's presentation at Liberty's investor conference next. Always do your margins research.
    Last edited by MUSCLE13; 12-06-2014 at 01:21 PM.

  9. MUSCLE13 is offline
    Addict
    MUSCLE13's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 973
    12-06-2014, 01:20 PM #149
    Quote Originally Posted by crunching.numbers View Post
    Personally i viewed DM's question as being different. Valuations v catalysts. S.F. tunes muscle out anyways....cant say i blame him, i usually do too.
    Breaks my heart. You know how much I admire internet posters, especially Seeking Alpha writers like you and Faulkner who have no background or a clue about the industries they write about. Love me.......

  10. MUSCLE13 is offline
    Addict
    MUSCLE13's Avatar
    Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 973
    12-06-2014, 02:25 PM #150
    Viacom and CBS may be in play. Wow! Media industry is never boring

    http://nypost.com/2014/12/04/eager-b...-viacom-reign/

Page 15 of 41 ... 5131415161725 ...