Page 21 of 37 ... 11192021222331 ...
Results 201 to 210 of 364
  1. bdp. is offline
    Addict
    bdp.'s Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 795
    10-16-2014, 07:34 AM #201
    Brace yourselves for another big dump today!
    EDIT: Looking like this mornings ugly futures may have tricked me into boasting a foolish comment. I hope it keeps up!
    Last edited by bdp.; 10-16-2014 at 10:40 AM.

  2. dm_4 is offline
    Guru
    dm_4's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Location: Boston, Ma Posts: 3,029
    10-16-2014, 10:54 AM #202
    Fed bond buying expected to end this month.

    http://www.therepublic.com/view/stor...of-Bond-Buying

  3. Wolf Child is offline
    Addict
    Wolf Child's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 887
    10-16-2014, 12:19 PM #203
    up $8k riding the lightning so far this morning.

    I am completely incapable of sitting by and waiting for sh!t to settle.

    Good luck guys

  4. dm_4 is offline
    Guru
    dm_4's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Location: Boston, Ma Posts: 3,029
    10-16-2014, 12:23 PM #204
    Quote Originally Posted by Wolf Child View Post
    up $8k riding the lightning so far this morning.

    I am completely incapable of sitting by and waiting for sh!t to settle.

    Good luck guys

    lol....awesome!!

  5. dm_4 is offline
    Guru
    dm_4's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Location: Boston, Ma Posts: 3,029
    10-16-2014, 01:08 PM #205
    Seems like the times a changing.....HBO and CBS are starting to offer their channels as stand alones over the internet.

    http://money.cnn.com/2014/10/15/medi...net/index.html

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/cbs-of...130026588.html

  6. beehaus is offline
    Member
    beehaus's Avatar
    Joined: Feb 2013 Posts: 80
    10-16-2014, 06:51 PM #206
    Changing indeed. We have several guys in our office under 25 that don't pay for cable and think it is crazy to do so. Ala cart entertainment will be a game changer as people just pay for what they watch and not for packages. Hopefully SIRI management has the vision to finish this "marathon" they speak of....

  7. dm_4 is offline
    Guru
    dm_4's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Location: Boston, Ma Posts: 3,029
    10-17-2014, 07:43 AM #207
    Seeking Alpo article regarding another sirius legal setback.

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/2569...app=1&uprof=19


    On a positive note...futures are green.
    Last edited by dm_4; 10-17-2014 at 07:49 AM.

  8. dm_4 is offline
    Guru
    dm_4's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Location: Boston, Ma Posts: 3,029
    10-17-2014, 08:33 AM #208
    Possibility Feds continue buying bonds beyond oct.

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/market...095242330.html

  9. bdp. is offline
    Addict
    bdp.'s Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 795
    10-17-2014, 08:33 AM #209
    Quote Originally Posted by dm_4 View Post
    Seeking Alpo article regarding another sirius legal setback.

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/2569...app=1&uprof=19


    On a positive note...futures are green.
    The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution. The supremacy clause contains what's known as the doctrine of pre-emption, which says that the federal government wins in the case of conflicting legislation. Basically, if a federal and state law contradict, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the feds can decide to stop you. When there is a conflict between a state law and federal law, it is the federal law that prevails. For example, if a federal regulation prohibits the use of medical marijuana, but a state regulation allows it, the federal law prevails.
    So, according to federal law, there's nothing to worry about, unless of course, they manage to overturn a federal law which is less than unlikely. So, although annoying, I truly believe there is not much to worry about here. Of course you would never see anything written on SA or elsewhere defending the law as I have clearly outlined above.

  10. dm_4 is offline
    Guru
    dm_4's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2012 Location: Boston, Ma Posts: 3,029
    10-17-2014, 09:10 AM #210
    Quote Originally Posted by bdp. View Post
    The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution. The supremacy clause contains what's known as the doctrine of pre-emption, which says that the federal government wins in the case of conflicting legislation. Basically, if a federal and state law contradict, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the feds can decide to stop you. When there is a conflict between a state law and federal law, it is the federal law that prevails. For example, if a federal regulation prohibits the use of medical marijuana, but a state regulation allows it, the federal law prevails.
    So, according to federal law, there's nothing to worry about, unless of course, they manage to overturn a federal law which is less than unlikely. So, although annoying, I truly believe there is not much to worry about here. Of course you would never see anything written on SA or elsewhere defending the law as I have clearly outlined above.

    BDP i agree with 99% of what you state. My only concern from what little i know about the CA cases....is that the fed law applies from a certain date going forward (1972), yet may be quiet as to pre 72. One could argue that if the fed legislation was quiet to pre 72 then no real conflict of legislation exists between states and feds. it will be interesting to see what the New York Court decides. I am not too worried about it...i just posted the link because it was siri related.
    Last edited by dm_4; 10-17-2014 at 09:30 AM.

Page 21 of 37 ... 11192021222331 ...