Page 11 of 14 ... 910111213 ...
Results 101 to 110 of 138
  1. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    04-02-2012, 01:22 PM #101
    I am a Democrat not a Socialist but we all know that he understands that.
    He would prefer to not show his ignorance on a whole host of issues.

    Wonder why SeriouslyWrong wont answer a serious question about what he believes?
    I think we all know why. Whenever he does he leaves himself vulnerable to attack for his lack of
    Knowledge of the FACTS.


    Does he believe in Paul Ryan's budget?

    Does he think Mr. Posner is a Marxist with his critique of the financial system. We will probably never know.

    What we do know is that he is a follower of the economic predictions of Mr. Schiff and a believer in his economic theories.
    All ONE needs to know.

  2. SiriuslyLong is offline
    Guru
    SiriuslyLong's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 3,560
    04-02-2012, 03:07 PM #102
    Quote Originally Posted by Havakasha View Post
    I am a Democrat not a Socialist but we all know that he understands that.
    He would prefer to not show his ignorance on a whole host of issues.

    Wonder why SeriouslyWrong wont answer a serious question about what he believes?
    I think we all know why. Whenever he does he leaves himself vulnerable to attack for his lack of
    Knowledge of the FACTS.


    Does he believe in Paul Ryan's budget?

    Does he think Mr. Posner is a Marxist with his critique of the financial system. We will probably never know.

    What we do know is that he is a follower of the economic predictions of Mr. Schiff and a believer in his economic theories.
    All ONE needs to know.
    Yeah, yeah, yeah... this coming from a guy who hasn't worked an honest days work in his life........... A guy who sites a poll as a fact.

    Back to Schiff? The topic you go when you have nothing to say?? Do I really need to repeat that Schiff's investment advise has been pretty damn good for me? Really?

    Follower? You crack me up.

    Here's a fact. The founding of this great nation was based on a limited federal government, and I appreciate that.

    Just embrace it Lloyd, you want the federal government highly involved in all aspects of society. That's pretty much socialism.

  3. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    04-02-2012, 03:15 PM #103
    Just like with the subject of Peter Schiff (who has been wrong on the overwheliming # of his economic predicitons for the past decade or more) he is always adverse to answering straight forward questions. We usually call such people cowards. Oh well. I tried.


    Lets lighten this up.

    Socialism!
    The stock market just had its best first quarter in 14 years. The surge has sent Wall Street analysts, some of whose forecasts seemed too sunny three months ago, scrambling to raise their estimates for the year. [...]
    Doll says stocks could rise 10 percent more before the end of the year. That would be enough to push the Dow Jones industrial average to an all-time high and the Standard & Poor's 500 close to a record.
    Last edited by Havakasha; 04-02-2012 at 03:17 PM.

  4. SiriuslyLong is offline
    Guru
    SiriuslyLong's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 3,560
    04-02-2012, 03:34 PM #104
    Quote Originally Posted by Havakasha View Post
    Just like with the subject of Peter Schiff (who has been wrong on the overwheliming # of his economic predicitons for the past decade or more) he is always adverse to answering straight forward questions. We usually call such people cowards. Oh well. I tried.


    Lets lighten this up.

    Socialism!
    The stock market just had its best first quarter in 14 years. The surge has sent Wall Street analysts, some of whose forecasts seemed too sunny three months ago, scrambling to raise their estimates for the year. [...]
    Doll says stocks could rise 10 percent more before the end of the year. That would be enough to push the Dow Jones industrial average to an all-time high and the Standard & Poor's 500 close to a record.
    You're retarded. I've already said that some of the $hit Schiff has spouted is ridiculous. Only a dip$hit like you would take it face value instead of trying to understand what is behind them which is totally ignorant. But then again, you are an extreme left wing ideologue and don't want to understand something that might run counter to your rigid agenda.

  5. SiriuslyLong is offline
    Guru
    SiriuslyLong's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 3,560
    04-02-2012, 03:35 PM #105
    But thank you for helping get this thread nearly 1400 hits!!!

    Clearly, people want to explore the topic.

  6. SiriuslyLong is offline
    Guru
    SiriuslyLong's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 3,560
    04-10-2012, 10:37 AM #106
    Obama's Marxist beliefs (in his own words)

    Those who know me well know that I am not prone to hyperbole. Yes, I have been critical of Obama since the early days of the 2008 presidential campaign -- and have written extensively on his radical past associations and his socialist plans for America. But my criticism was always based on the record of Obama's past. It was never baseless or without support.

    But I always gave Obama the benefit of the doubt that he would moderate as president and represent this great country fairly and with equanimity.

    I was wrong.

    Please listen to the following tape of Barack Obama speaking to Chicago Public Radio in 2001. If you wonder what he is really doing in the White House -- what his plans are for this country -- you will now find the answer.

    Listen to Obama speak right here: http://www.kennethgdavenport.com/200...own-words.html

    In his own words: Obama believes the Constitution is flawed because it doesn't deal with the issue of "redistribution of wealth". In Obama's view, the Constitution establishes "essential restraints" that prevent social and economic justice from occurring.

    Huh?

    I know its confusing for people who don't understand the basic way that Obama and other social justice advocates think. What he's saying is that the rights positively granted in the Constitution -- and the protections against government encroachment -- aren't enough. In this view, the Constitution needs to be "fixed", reinterpreted to enshrine positive rights for these "suspect classes" -- minorities and others who are "disadvantaged".

    So the goal here is really to re-fashion the United States Constitution to better account for issues of social and economic justice.

    What Obama said to Joe the Plumber is no accident. He is a Marxist: From each according to his means, to each according to his needs.

    This information needs wide publication and dissemination. Please send it to your friends and family. The president wants fundamentally to undermine our great free-market system -- and he wants to enshrine it in the Constitution.

    Think the Sotomayor nomination isn't the first step in packing the U.S. Supreme Court to achieve these ends? Think again!

  7. SiriuslyLong is offline
    Guru
    SiriuslyLong's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 3,560
    04-15-2012, 05:53 PM #107
    Obama’s Sickening, Marxist War On Women: Ann Romney Edition (Video)

    The Obama Campaign decided to open their assault on Mitt Romney by attacking his wife Ann.

    See it here: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/2...edition-video/

  8. SiriuslyLong is offline
    Guru
    SiriuslyLong's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 3,560
    04-18-2012, 01:36 PM #108
    When Karl Marx Speaks, Barack Obama Listens

    By: Matt Barber
    Barack Obama may have just lost the election. He has foolishly gone to war in an election year with tens of millions of Catholics, Protestants and Jews – Democrat, Republican and independent alike. He has thrown down a radical feminist gauntlet and dared the Church to pick it up.

    They’ve picked it up.
    From running up trillions in debt and deficit, to the vast expansion of the size and scope of federal bureaucracy, Mr. Obama has done more in three years to supplant our 236 year-old Constitutional Republic with a Euro-style socialist autocracy – than a lesser Marxist could have accomplished in a lifetime.

    But controlling the purse strings is not nearly enough. A central element of full-blown secular-socialism is the suppression of religious liberty – principally, freedom of conscience.

    Karl Marx once said: “The first requisite for the happiness of the people is the abolition of religion.”

    When Karl Marx speaks, Barack Obama listens.

    In what is perhaps the most egregious executive overreach in our lifetime, the president’s Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, has unconstitutionally decreed that both Catholic and Protestant organizations must violate fundamental tenets of the Christian faith by providing ObamaCare coverage that includes birth control, sterilization and various forms of abortion. This is as blatant a violation of the First Amendment’s guarantee to religious “free exercise” as we’ve ever seen.

    Despite two pathetic feints at “compromise,” Obama’s illegal requirement that faith-based groups pay for policies providing immoral “reproductive services” remains in full force.

    On Friday, the Obama administration offered its latest non-compromise “compromise.” LifeSiteNews.com reports: “The White House announced today that, instead of forcing religious employers to pay for birth control, it will force insurance companies to offer the drugs free of charge to all women, no matter where they work.”

    America: this arrogant, narcissistic, amoral man thinks you’re stupid. Who do you think pays for the insurance policies that provide “free” birth control, sterilizations and abortifacients to employees? Why, the very religious organizations doctrinally prohibited from paying for these “services” in the first place, of course.

    This is nothing but a South Side Chicago shell game, dressed up as a concession. Obama’s unprecedented attack on the First Amendment continues full steam ahead.

    In Dreams from My Father, Mr. Obama writes: “To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully.” It should come as little surprise that, among those carefully selected friends, he gives his “Marxist professors and the structural feminists” top billing. In fact, as we approach the 2012 general election, it has become alarmingly clear the degree to which various secular “isims” have shaped the development of Obama’s ungodly worldview.

    Can't stop now, the author is just about to go into Obama's ungodly worldview which is actually a quite interesting perspective: http://www.thelandofthefree.net/cons...obama-listens/

    It's kind of long.

  9. SiriuslyLong is offline
    Guru
    SiriuslyLong's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 3,560
    04-18-2012, 01:40 PM #109
    Quote Originally Posted by SiriuslyLong View Post
    You're retarded. I've already said that some of the $hit Schiff has spouted is ridiculous. Only a dip$hit like you would take it face value instead of trying to understand what is behind them which is totally ignorant. But then again, you are an extreme left wing ideologue and don't want to understand something that might run counter to your rigid agenda.
    Hmmmmmm, I wonder if he ever saw this?

  10. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    04-18-2012, 02:47 PM #110
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...cRwQ_blog.html
    Obama: The most polarizing moderate ever
    Posted by Ezra Klein at 10:04 AM ET, 02/07/2012

    In 2011, Gallup’s polling showed that President Obama averaged an 80 percent approval rating among Democrats and 12 percent among Republicans, making his third year in office one of the most polarizing on record. For a candidate whose campaign promised an era of post-partisan unity, it must be a disappointing reality check.

    But on Friday, political scientist Keith Poole released a study that probably cheered the White House. According to Poole’s highly respected classification system, Obama is the most moderate Democratic president since World War II. Which raises a question: How can Obama simultaneously be one of the most divisive and most moderate presidents of the past century?


    (Keith Poole, VoteView.com)
    Poole’s study is based on a system for sorting politicians known as “DW-Nominate.” But DW-Nominate doesn’t directly measure ideology. Instead, it measures coalitions. It’s got pretty much every roll-call vote taken between 1789 and December 2011. It looks to see who votes together and how often. The assumption is that the most ideological members of both parties will do the least crossover voting. And it works. Its results line up with both common sense and alternative ways of measuring ideology, like the scorecard kept by the American Conservative Union.

    Over the past century, DW-Nominate has revealed a steady increase in congressional polarization. Democrats have moved to the left, while Republicans have moved to the right. But Republicans have moved a lot farther than Democrats.

    Click on link to read the rest.

Page 11 of 14 ... 910111213 ...