Page 5 of 7 ... 34567
Results 41 to 50 of 61
  1. Atypical is offline
    10-20-2010, 01:59 PM #41
    Quote Originally Posted by SiriuslyLong View Post
    I didn't miss the point. To survive the ciriculums cited, one does need to be logical, scientific and critical. You missed the point.
    Okay. But you stink too.

  2. SiriuslyLong is offline
    Guru
    SiriuslyLong's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 3,560
    10-20-2010, 02:00 PM #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Atypical View Post
    "So we line the surface of the world with solar panels, and that enegy no longer gets absorbed into the Earth".

    Your premise is implausable. Your inquiring, (and scientific) mind should have known that.
    Hmmmm. That's not so progressive of you. I mean there were probably lots of folks 80 years ago who believed that burning fossil fuels wouldn't be a problem. Off topic, but....

  3. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    10-20-2010, 03:14 PM #43
    Quote Originally Posted by Havakasha View Post
    S&L, where do you get your tax information from? Fox news? Who told you 50% pay income tax? Its actually 62% and then "HOWEVER, BEING EXEMPT FROM INCOME TAX DOES NOT MEAN YOU'RE EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL TAXES." . ABOUT 60% OF THOSE PEOPLE PAYING NO INCOME TAX ARE MAKING UNDER $20,000. Wow, how the hell does anyone live on less than 20,000. You seem to have zero compassion for them. I wouldnt want to have to pay income tax on that little amount if i was them.

    READ ON AND GET THE FACTS!

    This is from FACTCHECK.ORG
    http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...ns_pay_no.html

    "About 38 percent of households have zero or negative income tax liability, but they pay other federal taxes.
    Towards the end of the campaign, John McCain and prominent conservatives like Lou Dobbs claimed that Barack Obama's proposed tax plan would amount to welfare because it offered a tax credit to the 40 percent of Americans who pay no taxes. We've already looked into the claims that Obama's tax plan is a welfare handout (in short, it's primarily a matter of how you define "welfare," but Obama's plan doesn't look any more like welfare than McCain's). But what about that 40 percent with no tax liability? Can it really be true that more than a third of the country pays no taxes at all?

    According to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, it is true that 38 percent of "tax units" -- which can be singles, couples, or families -- are projected to have zero or negative income tax liability in 2009. About 60 percent of these households make $20,000 per year or less.

    However, being exempt from income tax does not mean you're exempt from federal taxes. Everyone who works is liable for payroll taxes, contributions to Medicare and Social Security that come out of every paycheck. There are also excise taxes on some goods and services, most notably the 18.4 cents per gallon tax on gasoline. The Congressional Budget Office found that earners in the lowest quintile, where most of those with no income tax liability fall, shouldered 4.3 percent of the payroll tax burden in 2005 and 11.1 percent of the excise taxes. Their effective tax rate (which is calculated by dividing taxes paid by total income) in those categories, according to the CBO, was in fact significantly higher than the rate of the top quintile, although that top one-fifth of the population had a much higher effective tax rate for individual and corporate income taxes."
    S&L you avoided a large part of what is discussed here.
    When you say 50% of ncome tax you meant only Federal correct?
    Do you think the 60% of the people who dont pay Federal Income tax and
    make under $20,000 a year SHOULD pay Federal income tax?

  4. SiriuslyLong is offline
    Guru
    SiriuslyLong's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 3,560
    10-20-2010, 03:42 PM #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Havakasha View Post
    S&L you avoided a large part of what is discussed here.
    When you say 50% of ncome tax you meant only Federal correct?
    Do you think the 60% of the people who dont pay Federal Income tax and
    make under $20,000 a year SHOULD pay Federal income tax?
    You're driving me nuts Lloyd, Mr. Implausible. Hard to believe I'm more progressive than you and your buddy.

    It's right here.

    • The Tax Policy Center has found that while everyone is expected to pay payroll taxes, only 47% of American households now pay federal income taxes. That would mean that 53% of households DO NOT pay federal "payroll" taxes. Right?

    Here is a link to the Tax Policy Center

    http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/aboutus/index.cfm

    I do have to thank you for making me more aware of who is writing this stuff. The Tax Policy Center seems quite credible.

    Everyone should pay income tax. Of course, there should and is an exemption point. It's the price of democracy. If you enjoy the democracy, pay in to it.
    Last edited by SiriuslyLong; 10-20-2010 at 03:45 PM.

  5. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    10-20-2010, 03:52 PM #45
    I misread it. i thought it said 47% DIDNT pay federal income tax.
    What happened in 2 years for the % to go from 38% to 53% (if those are
    indeed the correct numbers)?

    Just curious what % of income tax you think those 60% (of the ones who dont pay federal income tax) should pay who make less than 20,000 per year should pay?
    Last edited by Havakasha; 10-20-2010 at 04:05 PM.

  6. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    10-20-2010, 03:54 PM #46
    S&L I thought you might find this interesting.


    One of the striking ironies of Fox News running with the statistic that 47% of Americans might not owe federal income taxes is that Fox News also moonlights as the unofficial station of the Tea Party movement, which clamors for lower taxes. You might ask: half of the country pays no income tax, how much lower do you want? Here's a more troubling point: if the Tea Party movement has a similar share of Americans making under $50,000 as the broader population (as a recent Gallup poll suggests), then why is this movement rallying under the banner "Taxed Enough Already!" when half of them aren't taxed at all?

    Forty-five percent of self-identified "Tea Partiers" make less than $50,000 per year, according to a USA Today/Gallup poll. Similarly, 50% of the total population makes less than $50,000 in the same poll. Despite this author's lack of direct access to the tax returns of the Tea Party movement, it seems safe to assume that if about half the country avoids federal income taxes, a similar percentage of the Tea Party movement gets away with the same even as they march and scream about their tax burden.

    This is a gotcha point. But it's a gotcha point worth making, if only to shine light on the sad intellectual bankruptcy of the Tea Party, a political movement that has taken over the news cycle like a particularly aggressive strain of ragweed. Tea Partiers want lower income taxes. But many of them probably don't pay income taxes. If we listen to them and bring even more Americans into the zero-income tax pool, we would only concentrate more of the tax burden on wealthy earners ... which conservatives are against. Tea Party apologists on TV will explain that what they're really asking for is lower rates and a broader tax base to diffuse America's tax responsibility. But if half the Tea Party doesn't pay income taxes today, a broader tax base -- even with minuscule rates -- would raise many of their taxes!

    The party's labyrinthine position on tax policy isn't worth untangling any further. It's a Gordian Knot that deserves a guillotine. When liberals and conservatives in Congress and think tanks and conference rooms debate tax policy in the coming months, they should consider a wide buffet of reform options -- but hold the tea.

  7. SiriuslyLong is offline
    Guru
    SiriuslyLong's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 3,560
    10-20-2010, 04:07 PM #47
    Have you checked out the Tax Center Policy website? It's full of information. Here's a link on small businesses.

    http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxto...dents_plan.cfm

    You know, so much of it is political posturing. Obama wants to reduce taxes for small businesses, and yet he wants to eliminate breaks for many of those same people who make a certain amount. See my point? It's like a zero sum game, but 1.) he raises taxes on the rich, and 2.) supports small business's - two wonderful things to do lol.

  8. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    10-20-2010, 04:08 PM #48
    Originally Posted by Atypical
    "So we line the surface of the world with solar panels, and that enegy no longer gets absorbed into the Earth".

    Your premise is implausable. Your inquiring, (and scientific) mind should have known that.
    Hmmmm. That's not so progressive of you. I mean there were probably lots of folks 80 years ago who believed that burning fossil fuels wouldn't be a problem. Off topic, but....


    S&L. Stop while you only look a little foolish. No one will ever be covering the entire surface of the world with solar panels.
    I guess its hard for you to acknowledge that you made a REALLY implausable and dumb point.

  9. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    10-20-2010, 04:17 PM #49
    I will check out the taxpolicycenter. just hope its not one of those Fox news think tanks.

    Still would like an answer to my question.

    What % of Federal income tax do you think all those people who make under $20,000 a year should pay?
    As well, maybe you can also tell me how can you have a decent life making under $20,000 a year.

    My grandfather was extremely successful and hated paying taxes (back then it was something like a 90% tax rate i believe. Today people cry about 38%. lol.) but he always had tremendous empathy for those who were less fortunate. He would NEVER (absolute truth) turn down someone on the street who asked for money or food. Thats because he never forget the poverty in which he grew up. You seem like many today who are bitter about and without empathy for those who are in need. I find that really sad.
    Last edited by Havakasha; 10-20-2010 at 04:20 PM.

  10. Havakasha is offline
    Legend
    Havakasha's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,358
    10-20-2010, 04:22 PM #50
    Quote Originally Posted by SiriuslyLong View Post
    Have you checked out the Tax Center Policy website? It's full of information. Here's a link on small businesses.

    http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxto...dents_plan.cfm

    You know, so much of it is political posturing. Obama wants to reduce taxes for small businesses, and yet he wants to eliminate breaks for many of those same people who make a certain amount. See my point? It's like a zero sum game, but 1.) he raises taxes on the rich, and 2.) supports small business's - two wonderful things to do lol.
    Its been proven over and over again that the overwhelming majority of small businesses would NOT see their taxes go up.

    I find it interesting that you fail to talk about the Republican opposition to small business tax cuts period. Is that political posturing?

Page 5 of 7 ... 34567