Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: This has to be put out there...

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    crfceo is offline
    Banned
    crfceo's Avatar
    Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 205

    This has to be put out there...

    C3sr has gotten their meeting with the FCC, and they it looks like they got everyone in the building involved as they dropped their own "bombshell" that they promised last week.

    In that meeting, they provided documentation to say that sirius and xm intentionally did not comply with the FCC requirement for interoperable radios.

    They are now demanding that sirius and xm be "tried" and fined to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars. They had some documents also filed which they feel strengthens their opinion. However, I checked the facts. At least those that are public, and they are simply wrong! I could just imagine the scene as Jesse Jackson & Co. passed out these papers and exhalted themselves as the wizards of satellite sleuth technology!

    The question I'm left asking is: Did the companies act in good faith and disclose the information. The facts are , YES! THEY DID!

    Going back to 1999, here is an SEC filing pertaining to interoperability, in which they state that manufacturing costs may be a barrier to interoperablility:

    The IB Order conditions our FCC license on us certifying that our system
    includes a receiver design that will permit end users to access the other
    licensee's system. In November 1998, WCSR submitted an application to the FCC to provide a satellite-based digital audio radio service. We also may have to comply with the interoperability requirement for any system launched by WCSR. We have made progress towards developing a receiver which is interoperable with the satellite digital audio radio system XM is constructing. However, because of the various technological challenges involved in designing an interoperable receiver, we cannot predict whether we will be able to satisfy this interoperability requirement. Complying with this interoperality requirement could make the devices capable of receiving CD Radio broadcasts and the related antenna more difficult and costly to manufacture. Accordingly, this interoperability requirement could delay the commercial introduction of these products or require that they be sold at higher prices.

    Fast forward to 2003 and we find this filing:

    On February 16, 2000, we signed an agreement with XM Radio, the holder of the other FCC license to provide a satellite-based digital audio radio service, to develop a unified standard for satellite radios to enable consumers to purchase one radio capable of receiving both SIRIUS and XM Radio's services.
    We expect the unified standard to detail the technology to be employed by manufacturers of such dual-mode radios. The technology relating to this unified standard is being developed, funded and will be owned jointly by the two companies. This unified standard is also intended to meet FCC rules that require interoperability of both licensed satellite radio systems. We anticipate that it will still take several years to develop radios capable of receiving both
    services.

    As part of this joint development agreement, we and XM Radio have licensed
    our intellectual property to one another.

    Both companies expect to work with their automakers and radio manufacturers to integrate the new unified standard and have agreed that future agreements with automakers and radio manufacturers will specify the unified satellite radio standard. Furthermore, we and XM Radio have agreed that future agreements with retail and automotive distribution partners and content providers will be on a non-exclusive basis.

    Now Mel joined the company in November of 2004, which takes us to 2005, and the merger was announced early in 2007. Not a whole lot of time to get interoperable radios done. 1 year?

    It is obvious that the companies have acted in such a way, that the only reasonable conclusion is that they have in fact acted in good faith, openly and honestly.
    Last edited by crfceo; 06-05-2008 at 10:13 PM.

  2. #2
    crfceo is offline
    Banned
    crfceo's Avatar
    Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 205
    These are todays filings from C3SR:

    http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/r...ent=6520012571

    http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/r...ent=6520012574

    http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/r...ent=6520012572

    http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/r...ent=6520012573

    Not to be outdone, the AG's got involved as well...This is important, because they attached the C3SR papers to the wrong ex parte filing...They are located at the end of the AG filing.

    http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/r...ent=6520012517
    Last edited by crfceo; 06-05-2008 at 10:52 PM.

  3. #3
    crfceo is offline
    Banned
    crfceo's Avatar
    Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 205
    here's a part that is especially useful....

    "We expect the unified standard to detail the technology to be employed by manufacturers of such dual-mode radios"

    We give them the technology, they build and market it, right...

    Well here it is since 2003...NO ONE WANTED IT!

    http://www.visteon.com/products/auto...ite_radio.html

  4. Ad Fairy Senior Member

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •