Originally Posted by Havakasha
I believe i read that Crockett of Lazard predicted it was -160,00 not -260,000 as John suggested. Just the facts.Either way Crockett is a obviously a bozo, as is
Mr. Mathew "hooligan". Did he make a prediciton?
You are correct I made a typo on the 2 and it should have been a one then when trying to remember what it was I just went back to my old post. That was my mistake.
Just the facts: John did have the stones to put his numbers out there for all of us to see! Don't remember seeing your sub predictions! Got to give credit when credit is due!
BTW- can you believe that the US is still a super power militarily...whether we like it or not! That's your man! What else can you say!!!
Not to quibble, but he said 80,000 to 120,000 so he was off by 51,000 to 91,000. Just the facts.
I think you are mostly right on that, but I do think it gos down after the CC. The problem is where the PPS will be at the time of the CC. I think if we follow the history of the last time, that we could see it get as high as 1.25 to 1.4 before the CC, so what that leaves you is in a place of it coming back to a PPS of something like 1.10. That PPS is higher then what it was the day you left your post. So in reallity it may never get back to 1 dollar again.
Hummm because you dont watch FOX you are misinformed again. ORielly had on Senator Coburn on his show and got it straight and guess what Coburn had to do, yes thats right say he was wrong. Not only did he admit that noone on FOX say that, if you did not buy health insurancce you would goto jail but admitted that the other MSM was by far more bias then FOX and before he said that he said that "well you also cut it because I had also mentioned CNN."
As a side note: I will say, while it was not said that if you DONT buy health insurance you would goto jail. What was said on FOX, was that if you dont buy health insurance and then dont pay the IRS penalty for it, that you could goto jail.
And yes FOX was correct in that because that was in the Senate bill before it was taken out. The fine was 5,000 or 1 year in jail. The fact is once it was taken out noone on FOX ever said that again.
I suppose a post CC sell-off could also occur as a result of the one-time-charges that the media will splash across the headlines . . . the question is how high does it run pre CC
But sure enough, there always seem to be profit-takers at almost any range of price swings and this CC may prove to be no different
Ether way no one is going to be taking profits from 1.4 all the way down to 1.03 when jondimes was talking about.
Ok while I said the new subcribers wont make much of difference in the financials this quarter that does not mean the old promo turned into new selfpay will not add to it and on that we see that they just added to last quarters coversion rate number. It is the amount of new self pay subscribers that will add to the revenue. That is a number we need to see to be able to predict revenue growth. Without that the rest is once again guess work by going off past history. I think they will have a big add (over last year) to FCF. Not because of new subscriber but because of the new financing they had unfortunately with that will come a huge write down in expences. It is going to take alot of wishful thinking to think they will have a pure profit this quarter. Then again who knows this pig fricks me over everytime and I could be wrong but didn't they have a big write down last year. I believe we may also see ad revenue go up some.
Did you catch the followup to the Coburn/ O'reilly interview?
O'reilly was caught in a LIE.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...39478.htmlBill
Did you also read that Murdoch finallly pulled Hannity off the tea bagger circuit. He was starting to get publically embarassed by Fox's close involvement and association with the tea party movement. It only took him a year. There are a ton of examples of Fox obvious political bias, hypocrisy and lies each and every day. If you choose to ignore them thats your own problem.
John Stewart points this out almost every week. You're probably too afraid to watch it. The truth can be painful.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_540172.html
You know this is a stock thread? LOL.
Last edited by Havakasha; 04-16-2010 at 12:07 PM.
Havasucker, really this is to easy are you really just 12 years old. Dumbass did you read my post (number 35) before you qouted it.
"And yes FOX was correct in that because that was in the Senate bill before it was taken out. The fine was 5,000 or 1 year in jail. The fact is once it was taken out noone on FOX ever said that again."
Now yes Havasuker you are once again going to think I have ESP because what does O'reilly come out with AFTER I posted that, YES he uses clips of OTHER MSM saying the samething about going to jail if they dont get health insurance. He then gos on to say almost exactly what I just did in the qoute above. So lets see if you want to see the truth and follow the link to see the truth (need to goto the "talking points memos" and play 4/15 clip):
http://www.billoreilly.com/video#play
The truth hurts doesn't it.
LMAO at you so many times it is almost painful.
Now as for Hannity once again you have been misinformed because you dont watch FOX. Hannity was also the one that made the choice because he found out that they were charging for tickets (5$) to one of his book signings that was to triple as a tea party meeting and to be on one of his shows. He not only did not do his show he cancelled the book signing. Now while it is true FOX also pulled his show, the fact is it was solely because of the fact that their was money that was being charged and not because he was covering a Tea Party event. More proof:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Tea-pa....html?x=0&.v=1
Now I know you dont like proof of facts but if what you where saying then I guess we would not see Hannity do any more shows on the tea party, right. How much you want to bet he still fullfills his tour.
I should have known better, this is the kind of arguements I get from someone who gets his news from the Comedy Channel. In the words of John Stewart himself, "We do not do serious news, we are on just before "South Park" for god sake. We are on the Comedy Channel for a reason."
As for this being the SIRIXM stock thread that is correct, Yet I have yet to see one post on this thread from you with anything important to say about SIRIXM.
Last edited by john; 04-16-2010 at 02:53 PM.
Reply With Quote