Fact 1: Any reasonable person reading the emails from those man made global warming scientist knows exactly what they are saying.
A.) They manipulated data
B.) The so called "Peer review" was rigged to keep any scientist that felt differently about "man made global warming", OUT, and therefore there was never a concensus among scientist.
C.) Data was hidden and then destroyed from all orhers that wanted to check the data to see if the results matched the data.
Fact 2: Even if you are not reasonible the programmers source code proves fact 1.
Fact 3: The UK MET office out and out lied about the findings they are spewing. I guess someone should have told them that NASA had THEMSELVES changed the results and that most of the hottest years were not in the last ten years but in the 1930s and that 4 of the years they said were in the last ten years actually fell well below 1900.
Fact 4: As has been proven NASA also has been cought in lying about their results and not until the data was looked at by, (yes thats right) a skeptic were they forced to change their results to what the skeptic said they were.
Fact 5: The tempature stations where MET is getting their data have been shown to have a bias towards higher tempatures. Most of them are in cities and not in wide open areas like they are supposed to be. The "urban effect" (that cities have higher tempatures then less populated areas) has been proven.
Fact 6: MET is even now in the process of covering up data on their latest study by not letting data from 3,500 of the 5,000 stations that they are relyng on, to be looked at by others. Thats right they are only willing to show LESS then a 1/3 of the data for which they are getting their results. There is not a scientific paper in the world that would normally get published under those same conditions.
Those are the facts not as I see them but as they are. You make up your own minds.