Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: "Oopsie daisy… NSIDC misplaces 500,000 sq. kilometers of arctic ice"

  1. #1
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836

    "Oopsie daisy… NSIDC misplaces 500,000 sq. kilometers of arctic ice"

    http://www.uncommondescent.com/off-t...of-arctic-ice/



    Thats right folks, remember all the reports you have heard of that all the sea ice is melting and we are going to be flooded. Well, well it has been found that not only has it not been melting in Antartica but it is growing by record levels.

  2. #2
    Sirius Roadkill is offline
    Mentor
    Sirius Roadkill's Avatar
    Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 1,882
    wow, I don't think I've EVER seen "oopsie daisy" printed as a written-out word before . . . nice usage

    btw . . . congrats on cracking the Top 5 and knocking-off Relmor . . . up next imromo

  3. #3
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    Sirius Roadkill, I felt it was the perfect word also. It is used as a way to show the way these man made global warming nutjobs react to this kind of mistake. They will just say opps it was a small mistake and it changes nothing, artic ice is still melting. Forgetting that this small mistake means that artic ice is the same as it was when measurements started back in 1979.


    These are the same mistakes by the same people Havasaka puts his blinding trust in and never asks questions. He feels because he trust them so much, we all should. The problem is most are reasonible people and after these kinds of errors (Also the now multible NASA ones) it makes it impossible for any reasonible person to take them at face value.

  4. #4
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    Oopsie daisy, is what the man made global warming scientist are also going to say when the "freedom of information act" is applied to the other 3500 stations out of the 5,000 they used. Skeptics (and they have good reason to be at this point) are on to this kind of crap and have proved these warmers like to hide and manipulate data so expect them to get their hands on it and for a true result to come out. You know, one that didn't need to be tricked or manipulated, just one that uses the raw data.

  5. #5
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    Yes I know Havasaka would like to push this kind of information down because it proves the people he follow just cant be trusted.

  6. #6
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    Yep they like to say that artic ice is decreasing but what they dont tell you is at the very same time antartic ice is increasing. You know these are just facts that dont prove their case so just like the rest of their science they just leave those facts out of their studies.

  7. #7
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836

    "Arctic (Non) Warming Since 1958"

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/05/1...ng-since-1958/


    Yes thats right, just some more little facts for you Havasaka.

  8. #8
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    Hey Havasaka I thought your scientist all thought this Ice was gone, WHAT the facts are different then their theories.

  9. Ad Fairy Senior Member

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •