http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17364
Good article it tells about the people involved and why they let their ideology get in the way of the truth.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17364
Good article it tells about the people involved and why they let their ideology get in the way of the truth.
Those are just the tip of the ice burg just take a look at the rest of them and were they come from.
Ideology it is a terrible thing when you let it get in the way of facts and the truth.
Wait. Was that another squawk i just heard?
Yes, that is the kind of response I thought I would get from someone when they have been confronted with facts.
Ho and yes Micheal Mann is also being looked into.
I wont let this get buried this link:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17364
shows just what is behind and how they are all connected. like I said just follow the money.
Yes these are the same people that Havasaka is saying, this is the warmest decade on record.
Another squawk? Lol. Only 19 days left to temperature figures for 2009. Are you scared? How many ways will you think to deny the facts? Come out of your cave John. Isnt it really dark in there?
LMAO, you telling me that, Here I will give you a clear example of you and your media, and "man made global warming" scientist buddies so deep inside a cave that you dont even have the correct data anymore:
First, the media (except FOX) are so intrenched in your ideology that while they made big news of NASAs FIRST report on the last ten years having 6 of the hottest years on record in it. They totally did not report about the FACT NASA had THEMSELVES admited to a multitude of mistakes (cought by a skeptic (which NASA gave credit to Steve McIntyre for)) in their FIRST report and had to change it to show that not only is 1998 not the hottest but that 1934 was and that at least 3 of those years fall well behind anything in the 1900s.
Second because your scientist are so involved in their ideology they must have egnored the revised results NASA must have sent them because they are still using NASAs First report and saying the exact same years as NASA USED to say were the hottest.
Here dumbass open your mind up and look at the link:
http://www.flashpointblog.com/2007/0...-changes-down/
If you dont want to believe that, just Google; "NASA revises temperature changes" I am sure you will find at least one of NASAs reports on the subject you can believe, you dumb twit.
So squawk that Beaaaatcch!