Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Programmers sourse code proves manipulating data about global warming.

  1. #1
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836

    Programmers sourse code proves manipulating data about global warming.

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/2...he-real-story/



    Thats right a programmer has just discovered the "programmer notes" on the studies of man made global warming. It shows that the results were so skewed and manipulated that he had to leave notes so that people looking at it would understand why.

  2. #2
    Havakasha is offline
    Ha. Ha. Ha! Boy are you going to be in for a surprise when the temperature readings come out at the end of this year and next. So Sorry that you believe in wacky conspiracy theories.

  3. #3
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    "People are talking about the emails being smoking guns but I find the remarks in the code and the code more of a smoking gun. The code is so hacked around to give predetermined results that it shows the bias of the coder. In other words make the code ignore inconvenient data to show what I want it to show. The code after a quick scan is quite a mess. Anyone with any pride would be to ashamed of to let it out public viewing. As examples bias take a look at the following remarks from the MANN code files:"

    "You can claim an email you wrote years ago isn’t accurate saying it was “taken out of context”, but a programmer making notes in the code does so that he/she can document what the code is actually doing at that stage, so that anyone who looks at it later can figure out why this function doesn’t plot past 1960. In this case, it is not allowing all of the temperature data to be plotted. Growing season data (summer months when the new tree rings are formed) past 1960 is thrown out because “these will be artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures”, which implies some post processing routine."


    Programers findings

  4. #4
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    hummm spin spin spin you cant keep spinning what you had said when the proof keeps coming out to show what you said was what you ment in the first place.

  5. #5
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    Thats right even Havakasha knows this to be true he is so convinced that he has to come here every few hours to try and bury this information, I wont let him though.

  6. #6
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    Only a twit or someone with a other objective would now say that man made global warming is fact.

  7. #7
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    Unbelievable I come and see havaska here and as soon as I post poof he is gone.

  8. #8
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    You cant take that out of context can you.

  9. #9
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    You cant spin the code and what the programmer is trying to say any other way.

  10. #10
    john is offline
    Guru
    john's Avatar
    Joined: May 2008 Posts: 2,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Havakasha View Post
    Ha. Ha. Ha! Boy are you going to be in for a surprise when the temperature readings come out at the end of this year and next. So Sorry that you believe in wacky conspiracy theories.

    Havakasha, have you not learned anything take a look at where you are getting your information from. it is the same group of people that have admited to falsifing data.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •