alot of boredom here with SP,saw Cos sold 60% of his position and waiting on the sideline...I'm in until at least next March and then will re evaluate my position Depending what transpires...
Just one of MANY engineers who disputes the claim. Very little damage at all. As you can see in this video, the building appears to be on fire.
911 commission didnt even mention building 7. Footage of this building was never shown by the MSM after that day.
I got links too. Tons of em. I also have the 911 commission on my side too. Admittance by ommission. Why didnt they mention this building? Because it was the one fact they couldnt even begin to cover up.
The wigam quote about the Chief giving the call to pull it, supports my facts, not disputes them. Thanks for that. Damage to building 7 was minor compared to other buildings that didnt fall.
This is pointless. You dont want to know the truth fine. Go live in a hole.
I hate conspiracy theorist. Especially dumb ones. Consipracy theory that planes took down the towers that is. What a dumb conspircacy theory.
Keep mention the moon landing John, if it makes you feel better. Only mentioned 8 times I dont believe that.
Near the end of this video, FOx steers him away from talking about building 7. Its hilarious. And they wont show his footage.
Last edited by relmor2003; 06-11-2009 at 10:47 AM.
JohnnyIrishXM,l I dont mess around to much with other sites like tweeter, besides here and watching the market I stay busy enough.
I am not selling for a loss compared to when I bought the shares. I ride it into a black hole before I do that. While I may decide to sell some of the rest I have at .15 but I doubt it, there is just something not right about the PPS and I will follow that hunch for a while more. I dont know if you are correct about the CAPEX being totally done for this year but if you are then this stock should see a sizable increase. There is no other way to report positive FCF for the 2nd quarter then to just say it and if they have that then it is asured to be FCF positive for the whole year when taken on the basis of the total years FCF amounts.
Name calling doesnt change the facts. Sorry. You can classify anyone who believes anything different from the common thinking as crazy, a nut job, whatever. Thats immature debating, and wins you no points with neutral readers. Your just burying yourself.
In the entire history of steel buildings,3 have fallen due to fire damage.
You can guess the three. Another undisputeable fact. The Oklahoma City Bombing couldnt even bring that building down destroying its entire face from floor to roof. LOL LOL LOL LOL
Last edited by relmor2003; 06-11-2009 at 10:52 AM.
Since you want me to look at links.
Hilarious. So sad to believe anything different. It so obvious. Like trying to convince you China really exists if you never been their. A skeptic can always dispute ANYTHING. You cant even PROVE your not dreaming all this up.
Hey I call a spade a spade a nut a nut, or in this case a nut a relmor.
As I told you before all the conspiracy theories in that video were debunked. Just like the few fires at the top of the building and that it was not damaged to much. I guess if you think a 20 story hole at the base of it is not to damaged then your right. Why dont you try looking at pictures of building 7 from the other side. Did any of those buildings have fires going for six hours before they even got to them, no they didn't did they. Finally once again you dont have a glue about structural design try that with the Chrysler building in Chicago. It is one of only a few buildings with the main structural members that are on the very outside of the building, it was a design flaw that worked out (function follows form) in that case.
once again you never did go to that web site that shows your conspiracy theory to be full of crap did you
goto the seventh picture down. Way different picture then the one you were showing isn't. Then again that is what you and these people do give you part of the picture and let simpletons like you lap it up.
The fact is I would like his email I would like to make sure the people of Boston know his thoughts on this. relmor there is one fact and that is first of all, most engineers and the two largest demolition companies that use explosives to bring down buildings agree with me. your thought on this are not the main stream they are far out theories that have been debunked time and time again. That is why you have seen them fade away, the way they have. It is also why the more you talk about this issue, you look like a crack pot.
Also you said this before:
"Because a building that wasnt hit by a plane, WTC Tower 7, fell at 4 pm the same day, having only a small fire, and no apparent evidence(outside damage)"
Now you say this: "Yes, there was damage. Not denying that."
Last edited by john; 06-11-2009 at 12:56 PM.
Last edited by underway; 06-11-2009 at 03:30 PM.