Originally Posted by
relmor2003
O you didnt tell me that. You have an architectual background. So your now a demolition expert, and an engineer. Architect knows about 1% what an engineer has to know. So unless your an engineer, your personal opinion on how it fell is also irrelvant. Notice I didnt give ONE personal opinion in my entire arguement. Still presented only facts, which 4 people on here still cant refute. Still waiting.
1. Not the owners call EVER when to evacuate a building. Thats the fire chiefs call.
2. Tower 7 fell from a small top floor fire, exactly as a demolitioned building would fall. If you compare pictures of tower7 falling vs. other demolitioned building, there is no difference, from the fracture points, to how it buckled.
3. Police prior to it falling, were saying it was coming down. So the police assumed a normal fire on a top floor, but never before in history had it happened, but these police just knew that the building was going to collapse. They didnt say it might collapse, they said it is GOING to collapse.
Steel buildings John dont crumble and crash down when on fire. Built that way. Still havent mentioned the other 2 towers. Focus now John. I know you willingly ignorant sheeple dont like facts, but sorry. I have to focus on that facts.
You focus on name calling, and other points Ive never mentioned. At least the other 3 sheeple can stay on topic.
Sorry John. Those questions for me at the end, sound like they are more for you. Not me. I mentioned 3 times at least the why does not interest me. Nor the who. Just the what happened specifically. Those questions can be answered later, once the actual facts are addressed my the media and criminal proscecutors.