Ill go back and reread the article, see what I can see. First read, it looked good to me. Street.com, WSJ, and Barrons has no jounalistic integrety. Either does Cramer.
Ok, I reread the article.
He should have quoted the source, yes. If the source is wikipedia, then I dont care, other than I would like to know that the information being presented is from Wikipedia, so I can discount everything I read. The Cramer video and his comments are great, and useful for investors. OVerall, good effort. Your throwing the baby out with the bathwater on this one bassmaster. Were all on the same side. Not Satwaves vs. Siriusbuzz, its retail investor vs. institutional investor/hedge funds. Were outmanned out gunned, and have less knowledge than they do. Cant afford to fight with each other. Instead we should focus on the issues, and solve puzzles together, figure out future plans, and anticipate challenges of the future. I for one would love if Satwaves is only mentioned here when a great article comes up. If I use infor from posters here, I site who mentioned the information, as a courtesy. Just one mans opinion. Bassmaster, I would wonder why you are so mad at this articles supposed plagerism. Steve is a nice guy, and trying to help the stock price by exposing truths that could be associated with our company and the history of certain players in this saga. Its a good thing. He blasts the company when necessary, I wouldnt call him a cheerleader either. Forget your distaste for Brandon, and that Steve writes for that site. If you never knew about the Cramer video, you would probably be more focused on that, than the supposed plagerism. You would be too floored to notice.