Originally Posted by
underway
It's not a matter of importance. It's market economics. I agree, there are plenty of professions which are underpaid. In capitalistic society, the market dictates, in general, who is paid what. Gov't has changed that in many cases, and unions in other cases. Certainly, in my view, police officers, nurses, teachers, firefighters, in many areas are underpaid. And, certainly, most of these fat cat CEOs are overpaid. But, unless we go to a pure socialist model (yuch!), there will always be disparity in pay. I think unions serve a good purpose in some places, but are a problem in others. Where a union exists and the company can't compete due to high labor cost, there's no doubt that's a problem. Generally, the more unique a skill, the fewer people there are with that skill, the more money they are paid: supply and demand. There are exceptions of course, but the market forces usually prevail. Unions tend to disrupt that force by leveraging companies for labor peace. It is a form of legalized extortion. Don't get me wrong...there are certain industries where management should have been jailed and unions did a good thing by leveraging them to capitulate and improve pay and conditions. Complex issue.