Results 1 to 6 of 6

.53

  1. sxminvestor is offline
    Addict
    sxminvestor's Avatar
    Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 738
    03-26-2009, 09:48 PM #1

    .53

    Next stop.

    Big short-squeeze building.

  2. bababoooie is offline
    Enthusiast
    bababoooie's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 140
    03-26-2009, 11:05 PM #2
    I agree its gonna jump into the 50's. Not all in one day though. It may take 2-3 days and may hit even .57 before resistence.

  3. just sirius is offline
    Mentor
    just sirius's Avatar
    Joined: Dec 2008 Location: San Antonio Posts: 1,209
    03-27-2009, 12:12 AM #3
    Baba/SXM

    Now you are talking. If your predictions come to fruition, I will finally be made whole again. 101K at .515 avg.

  4. Whynot is offline
    Enthusiast
    Whynot's Avatar
    Joined: Sep 2008 Location: The Mid-Atlantic Posts: 113
    03-27-2009, 12:26 AM #4
    Love the attitude and the near term estimate!!!

    Question- How did you all come to the .53 (estimated) number for the near term?

    Love some insight!

    Cheers,
    -Whynot

  5. bababoooie is offline
    Enthusiast
    bababoooie's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 140
    03-27-2009, 05:06 PM #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Whynot View Post
    Love the attitude and the near term estimate!!!

    Question- How did you all come to the .53 (estimated) number for the near term?

    Love some insight!

    Cheers,
    -Whynot
    Suppression point on the downward side was around .57. If past suppression points are any indicator of the future the we will see .57 +-2 wihin the short term. Although, Volume needs to be greater than 22Mil. MM's dont make money on low volume. Would expect to see a little flash in price coming to regaing attention of buyers.

  6. bsirius is offline
    Junior Member
    bsirius's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Oregon Posts: 3
    03-27-2009, 06:50 PM #6
    when is the Q1 conference call? I'm curious if they will try to "officially" release the iphone app at the same time in order to counter-balance the bad results from Q1?