Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. jonpluc@aol.com is offline
    Member
    jonpluc@aol.com's Avatar
    Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 96
    03-18-2009, 10:38 AM #1

    Hypothetical: If Stern sold his Siri stocks the day before..

    he announced he would not renew his contract, is that considered insider trading or is it considered a guy who simply wants to sever himself from a company and sell his shares and terminate his employment? Is it insider trading if you benefit financially by your own decision not to renew a labor contract?

    To put it another way, if Stern got hypothetically pissed at Sirius and wanted to take all his marbles and go home and sold his shares then quit he would be committing a crime?
    Last edited by jonpluc@aol.com; 03-18-2009 at 10:41 AM.

  2. clueless is offline
    Senior Member
    clueless's Avatar
    Joined: May 2007 Location: New York Posts: 251
    03-18-2009, 11:38 AM #2
    Legally, I have no idea BUT I think the only thing he could do wrong is announce he was leaving, wait for the stock to plummet and then buy more shares and not leave.

  3. kingadrock666 is offline
    Member
    kingadrock666's Avatar
    Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 30
    03-18-2009, 12:03 PM #3
    Quote Originally Posted by jonpluc@aol.com View Post
    he announced he would not renew his contract, is that considered insider trading or is it considered a guy who simply wants to sever himself from a company and sell his shares and terminate his employment? Is it insider trading if you benefit financially by your own decision not to renew a labor contract?

    To put it another way, if Stern got hypothetically pissed at Sirius and wanted to take all his marbles and go home and sold his shares then quit he would be committing a crime?
    yes, that would be insider trading....but the real answer to this question is that he sold his shares 10 days after he came over @9.**.

    biggest pump and dump eva!

  4. bananaz is offline
    Enthusiast
    bananaz's Avatar
    Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 220
    03-18-2009, 01:19 PM #4
    Yes, he would be trading on information crucial to the company, not available to the general public and would materially affect the stock price. It would be a crime. However, he seems to go out of his way to stay out of those situations and I think his investment strategies are much more conservative than SIRI.

    Actually I think it makes him smarter than all of us....... Certainly than me.