Just because the stock was up less than a penny today (on low volume) doesn't mean that the shorts have all covered and the shorting has stopped. The low volume and price action say that it hasn't.
That wasn't my point anyway. My point was that you were quibbling with me over semantics, but you say that "no one is shorting it anymore" - which is obviously not true.....
Last edited by Siriusowner; 01-28-2009 at 01:38 AM.
Last edited by Demian; 01-28-2009 at 01:43 AM.
The backing I have is technical: Low volume, price up (even if it went up only 3.64%) = no sellers, few buyers, no conviction.
How do you prove the contrary ?
I did not say you misquoted me. You implied I have said "the shorts had covered". I never even implied that the shorts have covered. The day they cover the stock is going to shoot up and volume will swell.
Last edited by Siriusowner; 01-28-2009 at 01:51 AM.
I did not "imply" that you said something that you didn't. You are falsely accusing me and it's getting boring...
SIRI moving less than a penny on low volume is really meaningless.....
Ladies, ladies...
Can we please move on?