Search:

I understand your argument, and you make some good points, some of which I already agree with. But it's pretty clear we don't see eye to eye on this haha

See you in the next thread

All I'm saying is that if Ibuity absorbed all incremental costs (their portion of a radio subsidy and development costs), the fact is that HD inclusion wouldn't materially impact satellite...

when that happens, ill fly out to wherever you are and buy you a beer. you are delusional

i never said it did say that. this whole thread has been a hypothetical situation about why the HD inclusion wouldn't be so bad if the costs wasn't burdened on satellite radio.

I think my position got lost in all the cow talk. If Sirius is going to have to pay for it, I don't support it. But if they make a one-time concession such as allowing HD to be in our radios at...

Exactly, and I don't think it would hard to get the public on our side. All you would have do to is issue a press release with the headline, "Ibiquity: You're Kidding Right?". And then go on to...

haha getting fired up now. this board is starting to get interesting



Farmer zcurzan has five cows who he has to milk by hand. It costs him a lot of money and time and it's giving him tennis...

Yes because spinning your tires on the mud while the FCC stone walls you is so much more beneficial to the future of the company.

I agree with Newman's post. The question is, would Ibquity ever agree to something like that? They seem to have made no indication they they would be willing to foot the bill.

I have to hope that...