As i continue to say its always nice to read an article that discusses the issue as opposed to more rants from the right wing. Judge for yourself.
http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/11...ima-19517.html
I was wondering if anyone can tell me if John has yet offered an opinion on the Earth's temperature for the next 2 years? :D
If you read the emails they show nothing of what Fox News is saying. John and others just impulsively parrot their propaganda
OF THE THOUSANDS OF EMAILS, THE FOXIES SHOWED A COUPLE (YEP A COUPLE) IN WHICH:
A. CLIMATE SCIENTISTS SPOKE DEROGATORILY OF THE DENIERS (I MEAN JOHN SHOULD APPRECIATE THAT SINCE HE CALLS EVERYONE AND THEIR MOTHER A DUMBSHIT, DUMBASS ETC ALL THE TIME). THIS, WHILE NOTHING TO DO WITH SCIENCE IS NEITHER A CRIME, NOR AN ISSUE, SINCE THE EMAILS ARE NOT (NOT, NOT, NOT!) A SCIENTIFIC PAPER.
B. SHOWED THAT ONE (ONE, ONE, ONE) SCIENTIST USED A "TRICK" TO SHOW PRESENT ONE (ONE,ONE, ONE LOL) PIECE OF DATA IN A PARTICULAR WAY. THE "TRICK" WRITTEN ABOUT IN THE EMAIL ISNT A DECEPTION, RATHER A TECHNIQUE
C. ONE EMAIL WHICH SAID THAT ITS A TRAVESTY ONLY REFLECT FRUSTRATION ON PART OF THE AUTHOR IN THE SAME WAY A D.A. AT THE OJ TRIAL COMPLAINED THAT "ITS A TRAVESTY THAT WITH DNA EVIDENCE THE JURORS ACQUITTED OJ"
GIVEN THAT THEY HAVE SHOWN NOTHIN IN OVER THOUSAND OF EMAILS THAT PROVES NOTHIN.
I SUGGEST THEY GET AN EDUCATION
BY ATTENDING GRADE SCHOOL FIRST.
The debate continues. Its always important to add rationality to wacky right wing nonsense.
Just got to get some facts into this argument