You would think skeptics could at least acknowledge that increasing clean energy would be a net positive for our country.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/09/op...dman.html?_r=1
Printable View
You would think skeptics could at least acknowledge that increasing clean energy would be a net positive for our country.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/09/op...dman.html?_r=1
You got to admit John he makes a persuasive argument.
John you there? You read it? Or do you just LOVE to read your own words over and over. lol.
Please tell me whats wrong with Tom Friedman's argument?
Read something intelligent for a change.
Sorry but i just got to put this up at the top again. Too much logic to be ignored
You Cheney spooning, Beck tuning, palin tooting, Fox News dooping caveman.:D
Cheney spooning. John stop that. You, Cheney, and the Taliban sharing the same cave. How about that.
Can i substitute Cheney for batty John? lol.