Court Decision Stings SiriusXM

gavel-handA Federal judge has ruled in favor of the Turtles in a lawsuit about royalties that may mean that the Turtles and Sirius XM are not “Happy Together”.  In addition, the ruling may pave the way for royalty payments to many other artists who’s songs predate 1972.  The copyright laws in the United States deal with royalties post 1972 and leave the issue of pre-1972 recordings up to each state.  The Turtles filed their case in California.

The decision by the judge will also be ammunition in a Sound Exchange suit against SiriusXM for its exclusion of pre-1972 air plays from standard royalty payments.  While this issue of pre-1972 will not really endanger the SiriusXM business model, it will carry some minor impacts to the cash position and how the company conducts its business.  SiriusXM has several channels dedicated to decades that pre-date 1972.  The bigger issue is that the Turtles are seeking $100 million and a class action status that could really put a dent in the cash position of the company.  The ruling this week means that investors need to consider the possibility of ultimately getting an unfavorable result from the suit.  Part of the ruling stated this:

 “While Sirius XM’s statement of the rule of statutory construction is accurate, it is inapplicable here because there is no pre-1982 (or post-1982) body of California common law denying sound recording owners the exclusive right to publicly perform their recordings. Sirius XM cannot point to a single case in which a judge considered facts implicating this right or even theorized on the right then decided that the right of public performance does not attach to ownership of sound recordings in California. The Court cannot extrapolate a common law rule regarding public performance rights in sound recordings if the facts that would prompt a court to rule on the issue have simply never been presented in a California court. In this judicial void,the rule of statutory construction requiring express statements to alter the common law does not apply because, when the legislature passed § 980(a)(2), there was no common law rule in California rejecting public performance rights in sound recording ownership…”

IV. Conclusion
For the reasons above, Flo & Eddie’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on all
causes of action, but only so far as the claims are premised on Sirius XM’s public performance
of Flo & Eddie’s recordings, not its alleged reproductions.

This issue is not going to go away.  Royalties have been an issue surrounding services like SiriusXM and Pandora for quite some time.  In fact, until there is more clear and concise laws on the books, there will always be instances where one side or the other can assert one stance or another.  With a lot of ambiguity still at play, there is potential that other artists begin trying to file their own suits in any number of states.  Stay Tuned!


SiriiusXM Gets Initial Ruling On Royalty Suit

SiriusXM received a bit of positive news recently when a Judge hearing the lawsuit vs. SoundExchange ruled that the royalty matter relating to pre-1972 music should be determined by the CRB royalty board instead of in Federal Court.   U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon , in his ruling this past Tuesday stated that the issue… → Read More


SiriusXM In Hot Water Over Mailing Envelopes

SiriusXM has had its share of spats with consumer advocate groups regarding marketing practices over the years.  There have also been a handful of lawsuits centered around people receiving unwanted communications from the satellite radio provider, and suits complaing that SiriusXM is obtaining personal information about car buyers.  This latest lawsuit takes the cake though… → Read More

fruit salad

SiriusXM Answers Back In Howard Stern Intern Lawsuit

SiriusXM has wasted very little time in firing back on a potential class action lawsuit involving a former intern for the Howard Stern Show.  The suit alleges that SiriusXM failed to pay a non-paid intern and according to the plaintiff, Melissa Tierney was born from an alleged injury suffered when getting Stern his fruit salad…. → Read More


Sound Exchange Sues SiriusXM

It certainly did not take long for Sound Exchange to jump onto the lawsuit bandwagon on the heels of the Turtles lawsuit.  The latest suit centers around royalties for pre-February 1972 music played by the satellite radio provider.   Sound Exchange has no real authority to collect royalties from pre-1972, but their complaint actually centers… → Read More


Turtles File $100 Million Lawsuit Against SiriusXM

The Turtles are hoping that a lawsuit against SiriusXM could pave the way to new royalty protections.  The band is a lead plaintiff in a $100 million lawsuit against satellite radio provider SiriusXM.  It has been alleged that the company has infringed on millions of old recordings from hundreds if not thousands of artists who’s… → Read More


DeLuca Case Against SiriusXM Gets Clarity

Last week I notified SiriusBuzz Premium members of some new litigation against the company.  The new cases at the time were a patent case and DeLuca v. SiriusXM.  Since then another patent case has been foiled and we now have more clarity on the DeLuca matter. DeLuca is an employee of SiriusXM and acts as a producer…. → Read More


SiriusXM Sued by Miami Police Relief and Pension Fund

It never stops!  There will always be someone suing someone and SiriusXM is not immune.  The Miami Police Relief and Pension fund has filed a lawsuit alleging that the SiriusXM (NASDAQ:SIRI) board has not done enough to ward off the control attempts by Liberty Media (NASDAQ:LMCA). While papers are not yet available through the pacer… → Read More


Liberty Media’s $1 Billion Court Victory Could Have Sirius Impacts

Liberty Media (NASDAQ:LMCA) has won a landmark decision in a court case dating back to 2002 which could put about $1 Billion into its coffers, and perhaps as much as $2 Billion if the Liberty request for interest is accepted! The case, which involves the sale of Liberty’s stake in USA Network to Vivende Universal… → Read More

SiriusXM Responds to SoundExchange Request for Summary Judgement

In a 30 page document filed with the court, Sirius XM (NASDAQ:SIRI) has officially responded to the request for Summary Judgement in a case that alleges consiracy against the royalty collection and distribution agency.  The battle is over alleged interference on the part of Sound Exchange and A2IM in Sirius XM trying to obtain direct deals… → Read More